njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4292-15T1 TIMOTHY R. KELLERS, … things, the following relief. First, plaintiff sought to have defendant contribute toward the tax payments he made … the MSA. He claimed had he known of such debt, he would have not have agreed to the terms of the MSA unless it …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1666-15T2 IN THE MATTER OF ST. MARY'S … 26, 2015. The Hospital contends that the Department should have used the ACS data as the "most recent census data" for … the 2016 SFY charity care subsidies, Passaic would have ranked seventh poorest in the State, based upon median …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5377-14T3 RAFIQ SALEEM, Appellant, v. … v. Dep't of Civil Serv., 39 N.J. 556, 562 (1963)). We have also noted that the Legislature has provided the DOC … for "possible exculpatory evidence[,]" the DHO should have downgraded the disciplinary charge in accordance with …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0951-15T2 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, … assignee of a mortgage has standing to enforce the debt. We have considered defendant's arguments in light of the record … v. Shuster, 27 N.J. Super. 554, 561 (App. Div. 1953)). We have noted that [t]his is especially so in a foreclosure …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … On appeal, plaintiff contends that summary judgment should have been denied due to genuine issues of material fact and … the cross-motion to file a third amended complaint should have been granted. Plaintiff argues that the parol evidence …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … P- 37 in evidence. Mr. Hall[] stated that he would not have continued doing business with K&K Builders, Inc.[,] … $76,457.38, he asserts that the judgment should not have been entered against him because the third sentence of …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5026-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a constitutionally protected right to the care, … the capacity to eliminate any harm the child may already have suffered, and whether that parent can raise the child …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4419-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to [NERA]," and that "[t]he fact that other defendants have received greater or 4 A-4419-18T4 lesser sentences for … federal cases that defendant primarily relies on have no impact on our review of his sentence as defendant …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5272-18T1 T.R., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … defendant's paystubs. Plaintiff asserts the judge should have ordered discovery. She contends the judge gave no … Notwithstanding, because of the remand, the judge will have the discretion to determine the extent and nature of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3530-20 ALBERT WITTIK, … and it is burdensome for defendant and others to have to defend against his frivolous motions. In granting … the . . . order and for which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0706-20 MIRAC SERT and SELINAY SERT, … plaintiffs' counsel advised defense counsel his "clients have returned to the United States. As a result we would … depositions so that we can complete same and thereafter have the complaint reinstated by the [c]ourt." He asked …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4551-19 PAUL G. GREENSTEIN, … Of course it would not merge. Those covenants have to survive the entry of the Judgment of Divorce. 5 … UIFSA filing requirements in concluding it did not have jurisdiction to either hear or transfer the case within …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2238-20 F.R.M., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … without taking judicial notice of any fact that may have been in dispute, and we discern no unjust result. … Defendant next argues that the trial judge should not have considered the message on plaintiff's cellphone for two …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2808-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … and his girlfriend began to argue when she refused to have sex with him. Ibid. As the evening progressed, … acquitted defendant of second-degree certain persons not to have firearms, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7. Ibid. The judge merged …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3497-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … an immigration attorney. Defendant stated "[he] would not have pled guilty had [he] known [he] would be subjected to … followed. On appeal, defendant argues the judge "should have held an evidentiary hearing on his ineffectiveness …
-
njcourts.gov
… LITIGATION : : : : : : : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 631 Civil Action MASTER … shared by or with the departing party will not be deemed to have lost the protection of the attorney-client, work … The parties agree that all company witness depositions that have previously taken place in the federal MDL and Delaware …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … Disposition Record (eCDR) system, defendants no longer have access to those records and are no longer their … exceeds OPRA's intended reach. Defendants argued they would have to review nearly 5,000 arrest card files from the time …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … the coastline. 451 N.J. Super. at 237-38. Because DEP could have taken the property in fee simple, it also had … [related matters] informed the [c]ourt that the plan was to have a continuous project that went down to Island Beach …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … legal grounds upon which the latter determination was based have shifted since the trial judge's decision and the … provision. The Court held that if the consumer would have sought a refund but was deterred by the prohibited …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … On appeal, plaintiff contends that summary judgment should have been denied due to genuine issues of material fact and … the cross-motion to file a third amended complaint should have been granted. Plaintiff argues that the parol evidence …