-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … appeals from the March 12, 2008 order that dismissed his complaint pursuant to Rule 4:37-2(b). We affirm. I. … court is required to deny the motion "if the evidence, together with the legitimate inferences therefrom, could …
-
njcourts.gov
… telephonically April 27, 2020 – Decided July 23, 2020 Before Judges Sabatino, Sumners and Natali. On appeal from the … M. Dexter, of counsel and on the brief). PER CURIAM In this complicated commercial litigation, defendant Alliance … of the numerous financial transactions and the associated facts culminating in a lengthy history of litigation …
-
njcourts.gov
… STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … of the gunpoint robbery of a gas station attendant. Tried together by a jury, defendants Alexander Ruiz-Negron, Ramon D. … assault, and other offenses March 10, 2017 3 A-1993-14T4 committed in the incident. After appropriate mergers, they …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 6, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti, Mawla and DeAlmeida. On appeal from … and she told the worker she was receiving Social Security Income (SSI) and food stamps, and was enrolled in Medicaid. … On November 14, 2012, a Family Part judge conducted a fact- finding hearing and found by a preponderance of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Plaintiffs/Intervenors- Appellants, v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … the judge stated: The [c]ourt certainly reviewed the factual basis as alleged by Ms. Ware, [sic] who claims that …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 13, 2021 – Decided September 22, 2021 Before Judges Fasciale and Vernoia On appeal from the Superior … 2C:43-7.2. We conclude the cumulative effect of the errors committed during the trial had the probable effect of … Against Him Prior [T]o Waiving His Rights [A]s Merely "One Factor Out [O]f Many" [I]n Determining Whether His Waiver …
-
njcourts.gov
… Interested Party. Argued September 12, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti, Gilson and Natali. On appeal from … homes and purchase another home in which they would live together. Mr. Jones also told defendant that after he died, he … Quinn, an investment representative at ODS, in order to comply with the ODS regulation. Defendant accompanied her …
-
A-44-52-23 Petition For Review NJ State Bar
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… JERSEY DOCKET NO. 089278 ~d~ IN RE SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION NO. 745 NOTICE OF PETITION FOR REVIEW OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS … Rule 1 :39-6 means only a "New Jersey attorney" ignores the fact that the plain language of the Rule contains the word …
-
njcourts.gov
… M.C.R., minors, and L.G.R., a minor, Cross-Appellant. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … I. We presume the parties are familiar with the pertinent facts and procedural history, which we need only briefly … home. On October 5, 2020, the Division filed a verified complaint for the care and custody of the children. The …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives
… Conference determined that it is inappropriate for a sitting Superior Court judge to testify as an expert … as to the propriety of judges testifying at District Ethics Committee hearings. The directive is applicable to testimony as an expert, not as a fact witness. … Directive January 5, 1987 Directive: Judges …
-
January 5, 1987
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… Conference determined that it is inappropriate for a sitting Superior Court judge to testify as an expert … as to the propriety of judges testifying at District Ethics Committee hearings. The directive is applicable to testimony as an expert, not as a fact witness. … File January 5, 1987 … January 5, 1987 …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 4, 2025 – Decided March 6, 2026 Before Judges Marczyk and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … 2C:39-9(d) (count four). He was acquitted of conspiracy to commit murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2(a) (count five). Defendant … judge's finding of the following aggravating and mitigating factors: on the murder charge, the judge found aggravating …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 13, 2025 – Decided November 20, 2025 Before Judges Gummer and Vanek. On appeal from the New Jersey … Unit (RHU). Sergeant Viola informed Essence that failure to comply with the relocation instruction would result in a … "that was fine." After an investigation confirmed these facts, the DOC charged Essence with prohibited act *.254 …
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 14, 2021 – Decided November 14, 2022 Before Judges Fisher, DeAlmeida and Smith. On appeal from the … IS REQUIRED BECAUSE THE COURT IMPROPERLY FOUND AGGRAVATING FACTOR THREE BASED ON SCHOR'S HISTORY OF MENTAL ILLNESS AND … offense or occurs simultaneous with and facilitates the commission of the charged offense. State v. Rose, 206 N.J. …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 6, 2024 – Decided February 13, 2024 Before Judges Haas and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the … hearing. We affirm. We set forth the following pertinent facts of this matter in our prior opinion on defendant's … from her neighborhood. Darby said she "called multiple tow companies" looking for it, but was "afraid to file a police …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 13, 2023 – Decided November 27, 2023 Before Judges Sabatino and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior … FOR 4 A-0230-22 COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO ARGUE MITIGATING FACTOR 14 AT SENTENCING, FOR NOT HAVING CHALLENGED THE FACTS … TO THE FACT DEFENDANT WAS UNDER THE AGE OF 26 WHEN HE COMMITED THE CRIME. (C) COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR HAVING …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 15, 2023 – Decided November 29, 2023 Before Judges Vernoia and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … first-degree carjacking, second-degree conspiracy to commit robbery, third-degree eluding, and third-degree … should reverse because the court did not make findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting its denial of …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 12, 2025 – Decided March 24, 2025 Before Judges Mayer and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … appeals from the summary judgment dismissal of her amended complaint against defendant Marshalls of Elizabeth, NJ, Inc. We affirm. We summarize the facts from the motion record in a light most favorable to …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 22, 2024 – Decided June 19, 2024 Before Judges Berdote Byrne and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal … an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We incorporate the facts from our opinion in State v. Drew, No. A-5494- 14 … whether the witness has a "special interest in the outcome," and whether the testimony was "influenced by the hope …
default
… Submitted April 16, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Rose. On appeal from Superior Court … 2C:43-7.2. We presume the reader's familiarity with the facts, which we reviewed in our opinions affirming his … ineffective by failing to support these two arguments with competent evidence, leading to the petition's denial. 4 …