njcourts.gov
… Argued February 13, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman, Gilson and Mayer. On appeal from … property located in the Township, at 14 Lackawanna Place. On appeal, the Township argues the trial judge erred … an appraisal expert, to prepare a report on the highest and best use for the property. According to McNerney's May 2, …
-
njcourts.gov
… ORDER #11 ----------) THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by the parties, with the purpose of … records and/or information are not available despite the best efforts of the plaintiff, the plaintiff shall describe … CFR 164.508. A copy of this authorization may be used in place of an original. Print Name: _________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 13, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman, Gilson and Mayer. On appeal from … property located in the Township, at 14 Lackawanna Place. On appeal, the Township argues the trial judge erred … an appraisal expert, to prepare a report on the highest and best use for the property. According to McNerney's May 2, …
njcourts.gov
… Argued June 5, 2018 – Decided June 22, 2018 Before Judges Reisner, Mayer, and Mitterhoff. On appeal from … that the Division failed to establish each prong of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We affirm. On … Lucas from the care of his maternal grandparents would "place[] him at high risk for long- term harm." Dr. Loving …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 16, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and Moynihan. On appeal from the … an August 6, 2016 custody order, the home inspection or "best interest" reports ordered by the judge in advance of … other . . . shall not be present when the exchange takes place." The parties appeared before the motion judge again …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 16, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and Moynihan. On appeal from the … an August 6, 2016 custody order, the home inspection or "best interest" reports ordered by the judge in advance of … other . . . shall not be present when the exchange takes place." The parties appeared before the motion judge again …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued June 5, 2018 – Decided June 22, 2018 Before Judges Reisner, Mayer, and Mitterhoff. On appeal from … that the Division failed to establish each prong of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). We affirm. On … Lucas from the care of his maternal grandparents would "place[] him at high risk for long- term harm." Dr. Loving …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 6, 2025 – Decided November 19, 2025 Before Judges Natali and Bergman. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … country. Thereafter, Grace went through five non-relative placements. Defendant objected to placing Grace with … their relationship at this stage would not be in Grace's best interests. In a thorough eighty-five-page written …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 26, 2020 – Decided May 20, 2020 Before Judges Suter and DeAlmeida. 1 The cases were … idea of adopting Jane as well. Jane has been in her current placement in a different home since June 2017. One of her … IN HOLDING THAT DCPP PROVED PRONGS ONE AND FOUR OF THE BEST INTEREST TEST PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) BY …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 26, 2020 – Decided May 20, 2020 Before Judges Suter and DeAlmeida. 1 The cases were … idea of adopting Jane as well. Jane has been in her current placement in a different home since June 2017. One of her … IN HOLDING THAT DCPP PROVED PRONGS ONE AND FOUR OF THE BEST INTEREST TEST PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) BY …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … parental termination plan because there was no permanent placement for Henry. In addition, Ray argues the Division failed to prove the four prongs of the best interests of the child test. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C- …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 6, 2025 – Decided November 19, 2025 Before Judges Natali and Bergman. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … country. Thereafter, Grace went through five non-relative placements. Defendant objected to placing Grace with … their relationship at this stage would not be in Grace's best interests. In a thorough eighty-five-page written …
default
… Submitted September 29, 2021 – Decided October 29, 2021 Before Judges Whipple, Geiger, and Susswein. On appeal from … the court began virtual hearings to consider the best interests of the child in late August 2020. Ruiz … network of friends developed after a move will possibly replace the network of family that she has here. So I cannot …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 29, 2021 – Decided October 29, 2021 Before Judges Whipple, Geiger, and Susswein. On appeal from … the court began virtual hearings to consider the best interests of the child in late August 2020. Ruiz … network of friends developed after a move will possibly replace the network of family that she has here. So I cannot …
-
njcourts.gov
… V. Township of Lakewood, Mary Ann Del Mastro in her official capacity as Records Custodian and Township Clerk of … of the County of Ocean, and Marc E. Roessler in his official capacity as Assistant Prosecutor of the County of … is remanded to the Superior Court, Appellate Division for reconsideration in light of Paff v. Ocean Count,i …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 3, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Gilson. On appeal from Superior … for terminating parental rights in accordance with the best interests of the children. See N.J.S.A. 40:4C- 15.1(a). … the parents' abuse and neglect of Cara and Kathy that placed them at risk of harm. He found that Jill and Charles …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 6, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Hoffman. On appeal from the Superior … parental rights to Josh before the guardianship trial took place. 3 A-4351-16T3 took custody of Josh at the hospital, … found that the Division satisfied all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). She found Dr. …
default
… Submitted March 9, 2022 – Decided April 5, 2022 Before Judges Whipple, Geiger and Susswein. NOT FOR … supported a finding that that the delay of permanent placement will add to the harm. Ann is the biological child … by clear and convincing evidence all four prongs of the best-interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), which, in the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 9, 2022 – Decided April 5, 2022 Before Judges Whipple, Geiger and Susswein. NOT FOR … supported a finding that that the delay of permanent placement will add to the harm. Ann is the biological child … by clear and convincing evidence all four prongs of the best-interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), which, in the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 6, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Hoffman. On appeal from the Superior … parental rights to Josh before the guardianship trial took place. 3 A-4351-16T3 took custody of Josh at the hospital, … found that the Division satisfied all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). She found Dr. …