-
njcourts.gov
… not in its Individual Capacity, but Solely as Trustee for the RMAC Pass-Through Trust, Series 2013-B, … 2013-B, and denying defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint and their subsequent motions for reconsideration. … We disagree and affirm. We glean the following facts from the motions' records. On July 17, 1998, Palifrone …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 20, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Espinosa and Guadagno. On appeal from the … failed to properly weight the mitigating and aggravating factors. C) The sentencing court erred in imposing … (App. Div. Oct. 3, 2012) (slip op. at 3), provided limited comments regarding Points I and II, and remanded for …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 21, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Suter. On appeal from the Superior … Camden's police officers challenged the Civil Service Commission's approval of the reorganization plan, and we … and matters arising among related parties be adjudicated together rather than in separate, successive, fragmented, or …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 4, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior … and remanded to the trial court to make further findings of fact. State v. Yohnnson, A-3406-05 (App. Div. Sept. 7, 2007) … Defendant and his trial counsel testified concerning their communications following the denial of defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 8, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Mayer. On appeal from Superior Court … 1, 2016 order of the Special Civil Part dismissing its complaint after a bench trial. We affirm. NOT FOR … was hospitalized at HUMC for several days in March 2015. In fact, defendant consulted with his health insurer, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 15, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Alvarez, Nugent and Currier. On appeal from … that dismissed for failure to state a cause of action their complaint alleging defendants NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … determine "whether a cause of action is 'suggested' by the facts." Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp., …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 11, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … hearing, the trial judge omitted a relevant mitigating factor. We affirm. I. We discern the following facts from … outside of the house, Marcos' brother, Angel, told him to come inside because it was late. Shortly thereafter, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 28, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Manahan. On appeal from Superior … in April 2012, upon weighing the aggravating and mitigating factors, the court determined that the aggravating factor … PCR judge held, and we agree, that the brother's isolated comments about his personal feelings about defendant did not …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … judgment the parties entered into an accord and satisfaction and thereby finally resolved all the known claims … and circumstances that bring this matter before us are uncomplicated. Following the death of her husband, plaintiff …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 16, 2021 – Decided December 30, 2021 Before Judges Currier and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … alleged that the trial court failed to elicit a sufficient factual basis to accept his guilty plea to the weapons … been the result of a stay of proceedings to await the outcome in State v. Gaitain, 209 N.J. 339 (2012). 5 A-0035-20 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 4, 2021 – Decided December 22, 2021 Before Judges Gilson and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … 2009, R.D. was shot several times in front of an apartment complex in Camden.1 He was treated at a hospital and … in support of PCR, "there are material issues of disputed fact that cannot be resolved by reference to the existing …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 15, 2021 – Decided December 3, 2021 Before Judges Mayer and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … 2020 Special Civil Part order denying reinstatement of his complaint against defendant Wells Fargo Dealer Services … this opinion. As a preliminary matter, we note that the facts and procedural history detailed below are gleaned from …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 18, 2021 – Decided December 3, 2021 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … See R. 3:23-2. We affirm. We discern the following facts from the trial record. On December 17, 2019, defendant … in court, and elected to represent himself. Before trial commenced, the judge rejected defendant's protestations that …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 1, 2021 – Decided November 30, 2021 Before Judges Rose and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … R. 1:36-3. 2 A-4182-19 order, denying her motion to compel defendant Wayne R. Clarke to contribute to their … COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY FAILING TO CONSIDER THE FACTORS RELEVANT IN DETERMINING A PARENT'S RESPONSIBILITY …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. RICK CUTTRELL, Custodian of Records for the Township of Neptune, Defendant, and TOWNSHIP OF … Public Records Act (OPRA), N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 to -13, and the common law. We affirm substantially for the reasons set … parties are fully familiar with the procedural history and facts of this matter and, therefore, we need only recite the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 7, 2021 – Decided October 20, 2021 Before Judges Alvarez and Haas. On appeal from the Superior … in 1 We also incorporate herein the procedural history and facts set forth in our opinion on defendant's direct appeal. … defendant Thompson was not a viable alibi witness and recommended not calling her at trial. Morasse explained that …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 4, 2021 – Decided October 18, 2021 Before Judges Fasciale and Sumners. On appeal from the … denying in part her motion seeking, among other things, to compel defendant's remittance of money in accordance with … assertion and affirm. We are thoroughly familiar with the facts. We previously upheld the April 10, 2017 amended dual …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 22, 2021 – Decided September 15, 2021 Before Judges Messano, Hoffman and Smith. On appeal from the … R.M. appeals, arguing the trial court erred in finding he committed the predicate act of harassment and that plaintiff … ended it in February 2019. Plaintiff and defendant lived together during their relationship, and plaintiff worked …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 1, 2021 – Decided September 9, 2021 Before Judges Hoffman and Suter. On appeal from the Superior … According to the plea form, the State agreed to recommend defendant receive 3 A-4857-18 539 days of gap time … question before [us] is whether defendant has alleged any facts that, when viewed in the light most favorable to him, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 13, 2021 – Decided February 3, 2021 Before Judges Geiger and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … and the limited record on appeal.2 Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking a temporary restraining order (TRO) … The parties were divorced in May 2018 and had a child together, who was then nine years old. The parties had …