Filters
- A-0912-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … is obvious. Unquestionably it was not intended to have the effect of shortening the time prescribed by the … not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. The order did not have the effect of adding days to any statute of …
- A-0169-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0169-20 C.F.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … C.F.A. were married on December 19, 2019. The couple do not have any children together, but C.F.A. has a … not credible. The judge's entire opinion is as follows: I have -- I've made the finding that the plaintiff [C.F.A.] is …
- A-5171-18/A-0911-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5171-18 A-0911-19 RUTGERS, THE STATE … for appellant (Daniel A. Berger on the brief). Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM In these one-sided, … 6 A-5171-18 Russell, who admitted his liability, should not have entailed a significant amount of legal services. The …
- A-3637-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3637-19 ORIAN JOHNSON, … is often confused with an option to purchase but, as we have explained, they are materially different: An ordinary … the premises"; upon receiving such a notice, Johnson would have thirty days to give the prior owner "written notice . . …
- A-0979-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0979-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … supplemental brief. Nor do we consider the State's brief to have raised any unexpected or novel facts or arguments. The … It is difficult to conclude that defendant's counsel would have been surprised by any of those facts or arguments. With …
- A-4297-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4297-19 W.S.H., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the September 13, 2019 order. Although the appeal did not have the effect of staying the September 13, 2019 order, see … it to enforce orders that are the subject of an appeal and have not been stayed. In addition, relying on Rule 1:10-3, …
- A-3285-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3285-20 PETER CHIAROLANZIO in his … for the plaintiff; the basis of the prior dismissal orders have not been cured, i.e. the no show fee and the expert … the judgment or order and which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under …
- A-0770-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0770-20 T.M.H., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that she was "cheating." Plaintiff went downstairs "to just have peace." Defendant followed her. Plaintiff picked up … was "straightforward in her testimony[,]" and that "she did have candor and general believability with regard to what …
- A-0810-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0810-20 Z.A.S.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, … called his mother. The parties married in 2015 and have two children. In August 2019, plaintiff filed for … wanted him to go to Jamaica because she believed she would have peace while he was away. When defendant returned from …
- A-0270-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0270-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … criminal laws that the Legislature intended them to have prospective application only. Ibid. Consistent with the … recent decisions, our Supreme Court held that statutes that have an immediate or future effective date evidence the …
- A-1869-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1869-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … The Item Before Determining It Was Contraband.2 We have considered defendant's contentions, including those … were 1 Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 (1968). 2 We have altered the capitalization of defendant's Subpoints A …
- A-2858-18T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2858-18T4 NORMAN OSTROW, INC., … Savio D. Figaro, attorney for appellant. Respondents have not filed briefs. PER CURIAM In this landlord/tenant … Fawzy's tenancy. It found the contention that Fawzy "may have lived in other buildings and continues to live in other …
- A-3942-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3942-18T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of "some type of conflict that the public defender would have in the case." Regarding defendant's case, Poindexter … documents involved in [defendant's] matter," counsel "would have learned plea counsel was not Ms. Manning, but rather …
- A-3410-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3410-18T3 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … certification that the decedent intended each son to have "one of the two family properties." Peter disputed … But "[w]hether delivery and acceptance [of a deed] have taken place . . . is a matter of intention." Ibid. …
- A-2058-14T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2058-14T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … had choked her, defendant's mother answered that "she might have put her hands on me like that, but she wasn't choking." … 130 S. Ct. 3502, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1095 (2010). If the findings have such support in the record, we are bound by them in …
- A-1218-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1218-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DANIEL DEHAVEN, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ … 1:36-3. November 14, 2018 2 A-1218-17T4 Defendant Daniel DeHaven appeals from the Law Division's August 2, 2017 order …
- A-1503-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1503-17T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … that but for plea counsel's deficiencies, he would not have pled guilty and would have gone to trial . He also argued there was excusable …
- A-0368-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0368-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … a judgment of conviction by raising issues that could not have been raised on direct appeal and, therefore, ensures … concedes this point, and contends "the PCR court should have taken notice of PCR counsel's obvious deficient …
- A-3928-14T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3928-14T3 IKEEM HIGGINS, RICHARD HOYTE … anything inherent about the Caribbean Night, which could have put [defendant] on notice." Further, the court noted … fairness and public policy dictate that defendant should have consulted security personnel or the Edison Police …
- A-1094-21 – M.C. VS. C.D. (FV-03-0455-22, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1094-21 M.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, … "[a]ll you had to do was tell me [about your lawn], I would have handled it," to which defendant responded, "[a]nd if … proceedings in which complaints for restraining orders have been filed, the court shall grant any relief necessary …