njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … SYSTEMS, INC. Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR and FRED M. SCHIAVONE CONSTRUCTION, INC., … 1,500. 3 A-0712-20 In October 2020, Asphalt Paving commenced this action and obtained an order to show cause …
njcourts.gov
… CONTRACT TO AP CONSTRUCTION, INC. OF BLACKWOOD, NEW JERSEY FOR THE ATLANTIC CITY EXPRESSWAY FARLEY SERVICE PLAZA … Transportation Authority's solicitation of bids on an upcoming project,1 the Authority gave notice that it would be … the references Guadelli provided "mostly" concerned work done prior to 2010 and nothing after 2014. Apparently based …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 21, 2022 – Decided September 28, 2022 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … sentenced defendant to five years in prison, subject to a one-year period of parole ineligibility. On appeal, … for the reasons set forth in the trial judge's comprehensive written decision denying defendant's …
njcourts.gov
… Defendant-Appellant, and JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY and FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION, Defendants. … Argued January 24, 2024 – Decided February 8, 2024 Before Judges Susswein and Vanek. On appeal from an … Joseph Morgan argued cause for the respondents (Kirsch, Stone & Morgan, PA, attorneys; Gregg A. Stone, on the brief). …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 28, 2023 – Decided March 24, 2023 Before Judges Gilson and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … we affirm. In 2016, a jury found defendant guilty of committing second-degree certain persons not to have a … We affirmed the denial of the PCR in all respects except one. Because the judge had not commented on defendant's …
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 15, 2024 – Decided June 7, 2024 Before Judges Vernoia and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from an … and Dominique Kilmartin, on the briefs). Francine R. Foner argued the cause for respondent (Hyderally & … on plaintiff Raymond Manzo's claims defendants failed to accommodate his disability, terminated his employment with …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 10, 2023 — Decided October 24, 2023 Before Judges Sabatino and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … Code, N.J.A.C. 5:70-1.1 to -4.20, claiming the judge erroneously concluded the State's witness at trial did not commit perjury. Having reviewed the record, in light of the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted June 18, 2024 – Decided June 27, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Mawla. On appeal from the Board of … the following notice: IMPORTANT: This decision will become final, unless, within twenty . . . days of the date of … 31, 2023, to expand the time for appeal to "within [twenty-one] days after the notification was mailed to the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 15, 2024 – Decided August 29, 2024 Before Judges Gilson and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … 5, 2023 order denying their motion to amend an unverified complaint. We conclude an unverified complaint found to be a … constituted an abuse of discretion. Relying on Kernan v. One Wash. Park Urban Renewal Assocs., 154 N.J. 437, 456 …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 12, 2023 – Decided December 18, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-3376-21 dismissing the defamation complaint plaintiff filed against defendants David Wildstein … plaintiff's motion for reconsideration was approximately one year out of time under Rule 4:49-2. Accordingly, the …
njcourts.gov
… Respondent. Submitted May 13, 2024 – Decided May 20, 2024 Before Judges Sabatino and Chase. On appeal from the New … that upheld a hearing officer's determination that she committed prohibited act *.803/*.002 (aiding another person … a hearing. At appellant's request, the hearing was postponed several days to enable her to obtain the report of …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 30, 2024 – Decided December 19, 2024 Before Judges Marczyk and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from … on appeal. On March 4, 2024, plaintiff filed a verified complaint for ejectment and an order to show cause, claiming … 2:5-4(a). 4 A-2352-23 The "appellate function is a limited one: we do not disturb the factual findings and legal …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 18, 2024 – Decided October 2, 2024 Before Judges Rose and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior … trial de novo in the Law Division. Defendant's notice was accompanied by a two-page "Reasons for Appeal." In the ensuing … and filed "what might be considered 3 A-1725-23 a . . . one or two-page brief, along with his notice of appeal." But …
njcourts.gov
… Agued May 29, 2024 – Decided August 27, 2024 Before Judges Sumners and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … plaintiff appeals the summary judgment dismissal of her complaint. The court ruled that as a matter of law, … no evidence of salt or sand where she parked to prevent someone from slipping and falling. Plowed snow was pushed up …
default
… Submitted June 7, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Haas. On appeal from Superior … reconsideration of the May 19, 2017 order dismissing her complaint with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4:6-2(e). We …
default
… Submitted June 5, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Gilson. On appeal from Superior … not cured those defaults. In January 2014, EverBank filed a complaint seeking to foreclose on the Mortgage. In its … the record. To vacate a judgment, defendant must establish one of the six grounds identified in Rule 4:50-1. See US …
default
… Submitted October 29, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Sumners. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2016-3516. Christie Monserrate, … The County imposed a major, twenty-day suspension for one of these infractions and a major, forty-five-day …
default
… Submitted September 27, 2018 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … Ziegelheim, appellants pro se. Phelan Hallinan Diamond & Jones, PC, attorneys for respondent (Brian J. Yoder, on the … sale, vacate the judgment, and dismiss the amended complaint on the ground of defective service of process. On …
default
… Submitted September 6, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and DeAlmeida. On appeal from Superior … judgment of foreclosure, and to dismiss with prejudice the complaint filed against him in this matter. Before denying … trial on September 10, 2015, either personally or by telephone. The court also remanded the matter back to the Office …
default
… Submitted September 27, 2018 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … the parties saw each other on at least three occasions. In one instance, plaintiff and defendant had an accidental … changed circumstances. However, the passage of time alone, absent evidence indicating plaintiff has no objective …