-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4817-18T4 E.V., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and defendant were married in September 2016. They have no children together. Plaintiff obtained a March 20, … she fell since he was not present but alleged that she must have hurt herself on purpose. Defendant stated he then …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0704-18T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Rule 3:22-4, a PCR claim is procedurally barred if it could have been raised on direct appeal. By contrast, Rule 3:22-5 … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." A "reasonable probability" simply …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3471-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … he was not a familiar face." The judge added: "She wouldn't have said he's not a familiar face if she knew him, it seems … other, although the whole statement was recorded. So we do have the benefit of that, and that can be just judged …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3527-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … on the medication in the infant where the infant will have withdrawal symptoms after delivery when they are no … a little prior to giving birth to my son." She claimed to have discussed her use of Subutex with her prenatal doctors, …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3964-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … not prescribed to her and/or should she permit [Joe] to have access to her children while he 5 A-3964-16T2 is … "safety, health, [and] development" of all three children have been and will continue to be endangered by Jena and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0023-16T1 JUANA QUILES, … the record. The judge noted that commercial property owners have a duty to maintain their properties in reasonably good … has enacted an ordinance, which states that property owners have twelve hours after daylight following a snowstorm to …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-6236-12T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … almost all of the hypotheses underlying CSAAS testimony have been rejected by the scientific community over several … He admitted that he had commented to the officers, "I have the mind and capability to lie and remember many …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3194-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … regarding the termination of parental rights. Parents have a constitutionally protected right to the care, … A-3194-21 option. She asserts the resource parents do not have an "informed, unconditional, unambiguous, and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHAMBERS OF MIDDLESEX COUNTV COURTHOUSE JESSICA R. MAVER, J.s.c. P.O. BoJ. 964 NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08903-0964 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0439-21 A-1444-21 BOROUGH OF LINCOLN … attorneys; Steven C. Schepis, on the briefs). PER CURIAM We have consolidated these back-to-back matters for purposes of … AGC acquired the subject property in 2001 and, since then, have utilized it for purposes related to their construction …
-
njcourts.gov
… JOHN C. PORTO, J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 633 Civil Action MASTER … of Tennessee, and it further appearing that Defendants have requested G. Brian Jackson, Esquire to represent them …
-
njcourts.gov
… JOHN C. PORTO, J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 633 Civil Action MASTER … of Tennessee, and it further appearing that Defendants have requested Katelyn E. Marshall, Esquire to represent …
-
njcourts.gov
… JOHN C. PORTO, J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 633 Civil Action MASTER … of Mississippi, and it further appearing that Defendants have requested Taylor B. Mayes, Esquire to represent them in …
-
njcourts.gov
… JOHN C. PORTO, J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 633 Civil Action MASTER … of Tennessee, and it further appearing that Defendants have requested Travis Swearingen, Esquire to represent them …
-
njcourts.gov
… JOHN C. PORTO, J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 633 Civil Action MASTER … of Tennessee, and it further appearing that Defendants have requested Andrew D. Tharp, Esquire to represent them in …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHAMBERS OF MIDDLESEX COUNTV COURTHOUSE JESSICA R. MAVER, J.s.c. P.O. BoJ. 964 NEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08903-0964 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0425-23 Y.H.1, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … room, he allegedly told plaintiff they "were going to have sex." According to the plaintiff, she responded, … the alleged assault, plaintiff and defendant continued to have text message conversations because plaintiff "felt like …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0391-23 VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff, … vehicle] rates [sic] for Florida. Since we already have a $150,000 line of credit and [another representative … litigation." KPMG LLP v. Cocchi, 565 U.S. 18, 19 (2011). We have also held that a stay of claims between parties to a …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … Among other things, Concord arranges for exhibitors to have booths to display their products and services at the … state. They further stress that they are located in Utah, have not physically entered New Jersey, and that the trade …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0034-22 FERRIS FARMS OF EAST BRUNSWICK, … Plan. Bd., 369 N.J. Super. 552, 562 (App. Div. 2004)). "We have long recognized that zoning boards, 'because of their … . . we merely 'determine whether the board could reasonably have reached its decision.'" Pullen v. Twp. of S. Plainfield …