-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0693-22 T.L.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … "she had lost her mind." Defendant admitted he "c[ould]" have grabbed plaintiff's shirt when this happened. Defendant … court because it did not mean that defendant would not have an opportunity to contact plaintiff, especially since …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0435-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … APPLICABLE MITIGATING FACTORS. POINT VIII DEFENDANT SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED A SEVENTY-FIVE[-]YEAR SENTENCE INSTEAD OF … time of resentencing were applicable; and all counts should have been imposed concurrently to one 3 Mitigating factor …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2813-21 IN THE MATTER OF P.L.1 … and the administration of the courts, the AOC Guidelines have 'the force of law.'" Ibid. (citing State v. Morales, … relating to the administration of law enforcement have the 'force of law.'" D.L.B., 468 N.J. Super. at 402 …
-
#07-96
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… in the Criminal Practice Committee=s 1994-96 Report, for revision of the Plea Form and the Supplemental Plea Form for … Supersedes Directives #1-88, #7-89, #3-90 and #5-94 which have been deleted from this compilation. Amended by … Center in a hearing and that at that hearing you will have the right to confront the witnesses against you and to …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3766-20 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … to treatment was minimally successful, and he would have "serious difficulty controlling his sexual 8 A-3766-20 … in the W.Z.3 case," the judge ultimately found R.L. "would have serious difficulty controlling his sexually violent …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3340-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … decision" because it showed "that she did 10 A-3340-21 have [substances] in her system but whether or not it was on … harm to the child and whether the parent or guardian could have avoided that harm by acting "to remedy the situation or …
-
njcourts.gov
… COURT OF NEW JERSEY BLINDS TO GO (U.S.), INC, | LAW DIVISION Plaintiff | CBLP | v. | Docket No. OCN-L-3541-25 | … thereof to both Parties. The Purchaser shall thereupon have the right to withdraw its exercise of this Option or to … information to the Court’s attention which it could not have provided on the first application, the Court should, in …
-
njcourts.gov
… ON OPINION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION MONMOUTH COUNTY DOCKET NO. MON-C-118-25 TIMOTHY J. … doctrine, arguing the claims asserted here should have been incorporated, or actually were ---- 3 subsumed, … of the tolling agreement and what both sides may have intended to accomplish by agreeing to what ultimately …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4138-23 SEBASTIANO PISCIOTTA and LINDA … getting electrocuted." That same month, Pucci attempted to have the water company replace its meter, but it too … until all UCC [Uniform Construction Code] violations have been abated," which also required the Borough to …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0204-24 KDN, INC. and NICHOLAS ANTIPIN, … of the June 3 order. They claimed discovery should not have been reopened because Youry filed an ethics complaint … reasons, we are left to conjecture as to what the judge may have had in mind." Ibid. Contrary to plaintiffs' argument, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0894-24 BRIANNE JOHNSON, … or "[t]he non[-]prevailing party knew, or should have known" the filing "was without any reasonable basis in … the original certificate of title as "proof." He claimed to have treated Ronald "like a son" and allowed him and "his …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1775-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … treatment recommendations contained in Yeoman's evaluation, have no unsupervised contact with minors, and forfeit his … 308 (2012)). "Those two categories of illegal sentences have been 'defined narrowly.'" Ibid. (quoting State v. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3338-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … possession of a weapon. In exchange, the State agreed to have the court consider defendant's second-degree burglary … arguments: 8 A-3338-23 POINT I THE TRIAL COURT SHOULD HAVE GRANTED THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS PHYSICAL EVIDENCE …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1621-22 P.J.L.,1 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Rule 5:8B(a) to assist the judge in determining who would have custody of them. After the judge granted sole legal … 1 (App. Div. 1993). Similarly, court-appointed experts have absolute judicial immunity because courts must "be able …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3056-23 445 YYH LLC, … under this Lease (if any), and the parties shall thereafter have no further obligations to each other except for those … the Resolution and the zoning guidance, [d]efendants would have had to get conditional use approval or would have had …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0578-23 M.K., Petitioner-Appellant, v. … suffers from multiple sclerosis and other conditions, which have rendered him bedridden. M.K. was admitted to Troy Hills … the identified transfers "were not adequately shown to have been used on [his] behalf." In particular, the …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1060-22 A.F.L.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, … or other personal accounts. The parties also agreed to have "reasonable and non-harassing communications limited to … time." 4 A-1060-22 Plaintiff responded, "I'm not home and have a sitter. Nice try lol."2 (meaning "laugh out loud"). …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … the Borough's interpretation of the EV statute. Courts have yet to interpret the EV statute to determine when a … redevelopment stages. If it did, the statute would not have used conditional language and instead would state it …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3845-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … trial. We hold it did. In reaching that conclusion, we have considered the four non-exclusive factors the United … permit, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-5(b)(1), and certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(b)(1). Defendant was not …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0970-22 BOROUGH OF MADISON and BOROUGH … hearing occurred on January 7, 2020. The Boroughs did not have a representative attend the public meeting, nor did … own judgment for the agency's even though the court might have reached a different result." Greenwood v. State Police …