-
njcourts.gov
… & CO., INC., Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION-MIDDLESEX COUNTY MCL Case No. 282 Docket No. …
-
njcourts.gov
… the arguments are fact sensitive and unique to my client. I have drafted the Motion and Brief. However, I cannot … I sent a follow up request on April 28th. To date, they have not been furnished. As soon as I receive the Exhibits I …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ZYPREXA LITIGATION LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY CASE NO. 274 THIS ORDER APPLIES TO …
-
njcourts.gov
… Inc. RAYMOND WILKERSON, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY Plaintiff, DOCKET NO. MID-L-3180-09 …
-
njcourts.gov
… T R A M TONDALL, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEWJERSEY I: : ! i LAW DIVISION Plaintiff, . : ! MIDDLESEX COUNTY I : vs. i • , • I I … the t I, -4 y.("".of , Clerk of the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County\ within ~ days of the date 1\ of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Trial be filed with the Clerk of the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County, within -i'J1)"--__ days of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… RE ZOSTAVAX LITIGATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY CASE NO.: L-003516-20 MASTER …
-
njcourts.gov
… 3. Briefly describe the current status of this matter. 4. Have you hired another attorney to complete this matter? Yes … list them and tell whether, to your knowledge, these papers have been filed or used. If you are in possession of such …
-
njcourts.gov
… as of this date , my client is not incarcerated and that I have: 1) Provided my client with a copy of the complaint and have read and explained it to my client; 2) Confirmed that … my client must appear at the Intake unit of the Criminal Division for an intake interview if required by the court. I …
-
njcourts.gov
… LITIGATION, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, BERGEN COUNTY CIVIL ACTION Case No. 291 Master Case …
-
#04-92
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… vicinage is to put in place a procedure whereby every Law Division, Civil Part case and every Chancery Division, Family Part case is assigned to a judge, referred to … to R.1:6-2, originally attached to this directive, have been deleted. … File #04-92 … #04-92 …
-
njcourts.gov
… INC., Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY CIVIL ACTION NO.: MID-L-008578-14 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3059-22 72-74 4TH ST HOLDINGS, LLC, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. LT-002288-23. Ofeck & … appellant (Patrick J. Jordan V, on the brief). Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0448-24 K.M.C.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, … ties whatsoever between [the parties]" because they have "no children together. . . [t]hey were not married to … is simply zero reason for [the parties] to ever again have any contact with each other and "this was true at the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3575-24 LEONIDAS PEREZ, … 4:26-4 may only be used when plaintiff does not know or have reason to know the identity of an alleged culpable … miscalculation, inadequate research or other mistakes have not been found to rise to the 'extraordinary' …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3052-23 SHMUEL HEIMAN, … necessity for him to make such a payment, as the lien would have been satisfied by the surplus from the [s]herrif['s] … The foreclosure action initiated against [d]efendant would have resolved any inability to pay off the tax certificate …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2275-23 A.E.M.,1 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … a plenary hearing. I. The parties were married in 2017 and have one child, C.D., born in 2018. Plaintiff has an adult … 2C:25-28(i) requires the judge hearing the appeal to have access to the municipal judge's reasons for issuing the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1215-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 3 A-1215-23 of the order reinstating [the] matter may have been mailed to [claimant] at the wrong address." … with the equitable 7 A-1215-23 notion that courts should have authority to avoid an unjust result in any given case." …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2837-23 360 PARKER STREET LLC, … paid $650 at the closing. It appears that the Sotos did not have an attorney represent them in the transfer of title to … landlord-tenant complaint to the Chancery Division should have been granted and the judgment for possession should be …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2164-22 KEARNY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, … sale to proceed.2 We generally "do not resolve issues that have become moot due to the passage of time or intervening … when our decision sought in a matter, when rendered, can have no practical effect on the existing controversy.'" Redd …