-
njcourts.gov
… VINCENT BRUNO, GUTTENBERG CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (in his official capacity) and MAYOR GERARD R. DRASHEFF (in his … Submitted March 14, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes, Koblitz and Manahan. On appeal from … No. L-4441-16. Cammarata, Nulty & Garrigan, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Thomas J. Cammarata, on the brief). Weiner …
-
August 22, 1988
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… a lawsuit arising out of an action taken in the course of official duties, regardless of whether that action was commenced under State or federal law, and regardless of … General was prompted by a request from me which asked for reassurance that judges would be provided with …
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 29, 2024 – Decided March 3, 2025 Before Judges Gilson, DeAlmeida and Bishop- Thompson. On … 22, 2015, almost two-and-a-half years after defendant commenced construction and renovation of the home, Scott … (1) failed to establish the Borough's conduct, through its officials, shocks the conscience and, therefore, is a denial …
default
… the substitution of his estate as a party in this case. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … state law claims. In March 2013, plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Essex County alleging … "Qualified immunity is a doctrine that shields government officials from a suit for civil damages when 'their conduct …
njcourts.gov
… Argued June 3, 2025 – Decided June 18, 2025 Before Judges Sumners, Perez Friscia and Bergman. On appeal from the New Jersey Commissioner of Education, Docket No. 9-8/23A. Christopher … seven specific prohibitions applicable to all school officials, including members of boards of education." Bd. of …
-
njcourts.gov
… all Strattice® Hemia Mesh litigation cases are centralized for management by the Superior Court of New Jersey in the County of Atlantic by Order of the Supreme Comt of New Jersey, dated October I, 2021; AND IT FURTHER … 2, Counsel for Defendant(s) shall provide the court an official service list updated every sixty (60) days. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… the substitution of his estate as a party in this case. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … state law claims. In March 2013, plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Essex County alleging … "Qualified immunity is a doctrine that shields government officials from a suit for civil damages when 'their conduct …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued June 3, 2025 – Decided June 18, 2025 Before Judges Sumners, Perez Friscia and Bergman. On appeal from the New Jersey Commissioner of Education, Docket No. 9-8/23A. Christopher … seven specific prohibitions applicable to all school officials, including members of boards of education." Bd. of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 29, 2024 – Decided March 3, 2025 Before Judges Gilson, DeAlmeida and Bishop- Thompson. On … 22, 2015, almost two-and-a-half years after defendant commenced construction and renovation of the home, Scott … (1) failed to establish the Borough's conduct, through its officials, shocks the conscience and, therefore, is a denial …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … assaults against a young schoolgirl where those crimes were committed on a school bus. Under the circumstances of this … from sexual harassment stemming from child sex abuse in places of public accommodation; that the "but for" element …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … assaults against a young schoolgirl where those crimes were committed on a school bus. Under the circumstances of this … from sexual harassment stemming from child sex abuse in places of public accommodation; that the "but for" element …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 19, 2022 — Decided September 28, 2022 Before Judges Mawla, Smith and Marczyk. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … concluded the Division met all four prongs of the statutory best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), by clear and … and stable home for the child and the delay of permanent placement will add to the harm; (3) The [D]ivision has made …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 20, 2020 – Decided June 16, 2020 Before Judges Rothstadt and Moynihan. On appeal from the … that the current custodial arrangement [was] not in the best interest of the child or children in issue." On appeal, … and after the New Jersey Division of Child Permanency and Placement (Division) became involved with the family, and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 20, 2020 – Decided June 16, 2020 Before Judges Rothstadt and Moynihan. On appeal from the … that the current custodial arrangement [was] not in the best interest of the child or children in issue." On appeal, … and after the New Jersey Division of Child Permanency and Placement (Division) became involved with the family, and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 19, 2022 — Decided September 28, 2022 Before Judges Mawla, Smith and Marczyk. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … concluded the Division met all four prongs of the statutory best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), by clear and … and stable home for the child and the delay of permanent placement will add to the harm; (3) The [D]ivision has made …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 19, 2022 — Decided September 28, 2022 Before Judges Mawla, Smith and Marczyk. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … concluded the Division met all four prongs of the statutory best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), by clear and … and stable home for the child and the delay of permanent placement will add to the harm; (3) The [D]ivision has made …
-
njcourts.gov
… Decided: November 17, 2017 Jill A. Mucerino, Esq., attorney for petitioner and cross-respondent, John E. Travers, Sr. … to settle an estate of the decedent as “consistent with the best interests of the estate.”3 See also Fitzgerald v. … because the nature of decedent’s relationship to his father places John E. Travers, Sr., in a better position to surmise …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 16, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman, O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from … (Division) failed to satisfy the four prongs of the best interests test required to terminate parental rights. … an emergency removal of Colleen from Yvonne's care and placed her into foster care with Yvonne's distant cousin. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 16, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman, O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from … (Division) failed to satisfy the four prongs of the best interests test required to terminate parental rights. … an emergency removal of Colleen from Yvonne's care and placed her into foster care with Yvonne's distant cousin. On …
default
… Submitted October 16, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Natali. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … (Division) did not prove all four prongs of the statutory "best interests of the child" test under N.J.S.A. … in the same resource home since November 2016 while Jon was placed in his current resource home in July 2016. Though the …