-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3253-23 FONG S. LIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORRIS COUNTY CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS and BOROUGH OF MADISON, Defendants-Respondents. ___________________________ Submitted September 10, 2025 …
-
njcourts.gov
… the suppressed, lost, or destroyed BWC footage. Citing our decisions, the judge correctly recognized the standard for …
-
A-46-24 Reply Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… 3 I. AS DID THE DECISIONS BELOW, RESPONDENTS APPLY THE WRONG PREEMPTION LAW; … arbitration at which that victim would have no rights, the decisions by PERC and the Appellate Division have taken away … the accused as part of the grievance process. The erroneous decisions will undermine the legal protections and process …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2104-22 RICKY MARTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. _________________________ Argued July 16, 2024 – Decided July 25, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3752-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL J. DOCE, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted May 22, 2024 – Decided June 11, 2024 Before Judges Vernoia, Gummer, …
-
njcourts.gov
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions that counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
A-40-24 Reply Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… on the residents of Berkeley Township does not. These two decisions could not be in more conflict. The lower Courts’ …
-
njcourts.gov
… 453, 459 (1982) (citation omitted). Our deference to agency decisions "applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions …
-
njcourts.gov
… N.J. 14, 27 (2011)). "[A]n appellate court reviews agency decisions under an arbitrary and capricious standard." …
-
njcourts.gov
… 10 A-0632-21 Although the reported New Jersey appellate decisions involving chain of custody issues have all been …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3419-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JESUS M. QUINONES, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted November 29, 2022 – Decided December 14, 2022 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
… arbitration process, the PIP statute mandates that "[a]ll decisions of the [arbitrator] shall be binding." N.J.S.A. …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3149-22 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Petitioner-Respondent, v. B.D.,1 Respondent-Appellant. ____________________________ …
njcourts.gov
… the State that have responded to our [affordable-housing] decisions by amending their zoning ordinances to provide … for doing in response to the Court's affordable-housing decisions: it "amend[ed its] zoning ordinances to provide … § 40-3.1 (2024) ("Appeals from local land use decisions including ordinance adoption are primarily …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4003-19 W.S., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES and GLOUCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondents-Respondents. ____________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4003-19 W.S., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES and GLOUCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondents-Respondents. ____________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
… the State that have responded to our [affordable-housing] decisions by amending their zoning ordinances to provide … for doing in response to the Court's affordable-housing decisions: it "amend[ed its] zoning ordinances to provide … § 40-3.1 (2024) ("Appeals from local land use decisions including ordinance adoption are primarily …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3149-22 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Petitioner-Respondent, v. B.D.,1 Respondent-Appellant. ____________________________ …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion …
njcourts.gov
… submitted after the ALJ's and before the Commissioner's decisions. In denying that motion, the Commissioner simply … with the responsibility for the regulations and final decisions adjudicating claims, to address the issues and …