Filters
- Bednarz vs Ethicon – Case Management Order to Extend Current Deadlines Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… MARGARET BEDNARZ, vs. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION - BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. BER-L-13372-14-MCL … ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON WOMEN' S HEAL TH AND UROLOGY, a Division of ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and … on Covid- I 9 issues entered on March 27, 2020," The provisions of Rule l:32-2A(c) and all other Court Rules …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2610-23 GAIL STAMLER, … II. We commence our review by defining the task at hand. We have long recognized when adjudicating a matter returning to … to answer was due to excusable neglect and that [they have] a meritorious defense." 1 Rule 4:43-3 is reserved for …
- Notice and Order – Family – Transfer of Certain Dissolution (FM) Cases from the Mercer Vicinage to the Atlantic/Cape May, Burlington, and Middlesex Vicinages Notice to the Bardefault › notices to the bar… this notice should be directed to the Family Practice Division of the Administrative Office of the Courts at … matters, cases in the matrimonial dissolution (FM) docket have fallen into backlog. More timely handling and … Consistent with the provisions of that Order, courts will have discretion to modify the format of • proceedings and to …
- Notice and Order - Official Comment Added to Rule 1:21-7 Regarding Retainer Fee Agreements in Statutorily Based Fee-Shifting Cases (Balducci v. Cige) Notice to the Bardefault › notices to the bar… all identifiable fees or costs that the clients may have to pay either up-front or at the conclusion of the … the case at the initiation of the representation. ~ Lawyers have a continuing obligation to inform clients about …
- Notice - Affordable Housing Dispute Resolution Program - Supplement to Directive #14-24 - Superseding Addendum (Required Elements of Housing Element and Fair Share Plan Notices to the Bardefault › notices to the bar… to Directive #14-24 incorporates the following clarifying revisions as directed by Assignment Judge Robert A. Lougy in … that one ( or more) of the sites in the plan does not have the capacity to accommodate all of the development … confirmation that all of the units on which the controls have been extended are code-compliant or have been …
- COVENTRY PLACE OWNER LLC VS. ADAM GOODMANN (LT-008301-23, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1880-23 COVENTRY PLACE OWNER LLC, … A-1880-23 Although Coventry considered Goodmann's lease to have expired on May 31, 2022, it sent defendant a notice of … disallowed pest and trash fees because Goodmann did not have notice of those fees, and disallowed late fees on the …
- FANG LIU VS. AFFINITY CARE OF NJ, ET AL. (L-2170-21, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2058-23 FANG LIU, Plaintiff-Appellant, … prejudice rather than without prejudice, and (4) she should have been permitted to prosecute the complaint on a … courts not to interfere unless an injustice appears to have been done." 6 A-2058-23 Abtrax Pharm. v. Elkins-Sinn, …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DAVID ANTHONY BATTLE (97-09-3979, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1364-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Rule 3:22-6(b).1 The court also concluded defendant did not have a right to oral argument on his motion. See Rule … hearing, therefore, is not required. 10 A-1364-23 We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and conclude …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3287-21 QINGYOU YAN, … which was sold to a third party, the issues before us have been rendered moot. Even if the issues on appeal were … when our decision sought in a matter, when rendered, can have no practical effect on the existing controversy.'" Redd …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. HEMAL DHEBARIYA (15-2022, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1786-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the plea in 2014; and (2) found that he would never have accepted a guilty plea unless he received an answer in … was an illegal sentence under Rule 7:10-2(b)(1) which would have made the five-year filing requirement for PCR …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FUQUAN KHALIF, ET AL. (91-01-0437, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0854-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … court has overlooked or as to which it has erred, and shall have annexed thereto a copy of the judgment or final order … "new or additional information . . . which it could not have provided on the first application." Cummings, 295 N.J. …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2744-21 JULIO GRACIANO, Appellant, v. … limited. In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011). As we have long recognized, "Prisons are dangerous places, and the … own judgment for the agency's, even though the court might have reached a different result. '" Stallworth, 208 N.J. at …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MANSFIELD CREIGHTON (93-09-3218, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3064-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … which relief is sought "if that factual predicate could not have been discovered earlier through the exercise of … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. A strong …
- MARK YILDIZICAN VS. ROMEO JIMENEZ-CRUZ (LT-000697-22, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0199-22 MARK YILDIZICAN, … and clearly I will say that I know that that bathroom would have required permits. It's not denied that he didn’t get … to Yildizican about it, Yildizican said, you know, that may have to be dismantled, and he said, no problem. If it's …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2427-22 MATTHEW LOTOCKI, … 28, stating the video was not ready and he hoped to have a response soon. Plaintiff states he emailed defendants … when the decision sought in a matter, when rendered, can have no practical effect on the existing controversy. '" …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. WILLIAM LEE (16-05-0427, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1626-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Cumberland County, Indictment No. 16-05-0427. Joseph … tended to support that version of events, as she claimed to have witnessed a trooper pick up contraband from the floor …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0546-22 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, … More particularly, defendant argues plaintiff did not have standing because the record lacks evidence plaintiff … See Do- Wop Corp., 168 N.J. at 199. To the extent we have not expressly addressed any other arguments that may be …
- M.T.S. TOWING, INC. VS. TOWNSHIP OF UNION (L-0242-16, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2911-17T3 M.T.S. TOWING, INC., … the Ordinance's declared policy goal in Section 505-1 to have vehicles towed in "the quickest response time . . . … or excused the distance requirement. 11 A-2911-17T3 We have considered all of appellant's remaining arguments and …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5163-17T3 EDNA ALBERT and SCHMUEL … Joseph H. Neiman, attorney for appellants. Respondents have not filed briefs. PER CURIAM In this personal injury … Michaels v. Brookchester, Inc., 26 N.J. 379, 382 (1958). We have recognized two "exceptions to the general rule: (1) a …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2675-17T4 SIGALIT SHAZO, … or for her use of the utilities. She either knew or should have known that she would be responsible for those payments … to defendant's other contention that because she did not have an expectation of reimbursing plaintiff, even though …