-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2684-19 K.L.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Defendant and plaintiff K.L. were married in May 2001 and have three children together. They were divorced in October … return date of the motion for reconsideration should not have been sufficient to alleviate concerns about whether he …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3711-19 W. JAMES MAC NAUGHTON, … noted that defendants were deprived of the opportunity to have "any meaningful participation in an extensive discovery … similar note, the judge held "[t]his extra litigation could have been avoided if [p]laintiff was upfront with his …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4755-17T3 M.A.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, … petition to the United States Supreme Court should have concluded defendant's challenges to the four-year old … III. APPARENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND BIASED DECISIONS HAVE NEGATIVELY AFFECTED THIS CASE. We address each argument …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3723-16T4 ARTHUR B. DENNIS, … court also informed the parties that if they wished to have the matter tried by a jury, they would need to file a … trial under an abuse of discretion standard. Trial courts have broad discretion in 6 A-3723-16T4 determining whether …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3139-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … on her. She took the children with her because she did not have anyone to care for them. At his girlfriend's place, … court because "the children were with her and they could have been at risk of physical harm." Yolanda appeals the …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2673-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … want to adopt him. The governing law is settled. Parents have a constitutionally-protected right to the care, custody … the capacity to eliminate any harm the child may already have suffered, and whether that parent can raise the child …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1515-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … was diagnosed as being on the autism spectrum and is homeschooled. Brad was actively involved parenting Ken as a … because it allows for ease of reference when family members have similar initials. 3 A-1515-17T2 resulted in Brad …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1570-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … by his opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the "feel" of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … that feature alone. Defendant contends the detective should have searched for filler photos using facial markings in …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2937-16T4 FLORENTINO MENENDEZ, … caused many hardships and problems" because she did not have "a positive relationship with . . . plaintiff's family … because she "does not speak English well," "does not have a driver's license," and "spends the majority of her …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0132-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … first, committed twenty-six years earlier, would not alone have supported a rejection from PTI, that defendant was … the occasion he was stopped. Defendant 10 A-0132-16T4 could have called someone to drive him to a pharmacy, just as he …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4057-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … he grabbed C.H.'s butt cheek and that his finger could have penetrated C.H.'s anus. Defendant later acknowledged it … grand jury hearings, was exculpatory evidence that should have been introduced at the presentation for the third …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4784-16T2 A-4786-16T2 NEW JERSEY … investigation was pending. Bob responded that Kate did not have 4 A-4784-16T2 a car, did not drive, and he "would do … not leave the state because Kate did not drive and did not have a car and that he would do anything to protect Billy …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2686-16T3 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … . . . shall be valid unless the contracting parties shall have obtained a marriage license as required by [N.J.S.A.] … the marriage, after license duly issued therefor, shall have been performed by or before any person, religious …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2978-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 1 The trial court found the officers' unmarked car would have been readily recognizable as a police vehicle because … that defendant did not live at the residence, and did not have permission to enter the house. On August 6, 2015, a …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5469-15T2 1701 E. MAIN, LLC, … Wawa blocked any existing right Miles Petroleum may have had to cross over from its lot onto Wawa's, and vice … of the Third Restatement's estoppel test, Wawa would have us assume that Miles Lerman's silence in response to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4135-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … such a letter had been given to him at the time, he would have made an effort to include it in support of defendant’s … key factors under Slater.1 He also testified that he would have spoken to Moses’ attorney to get his "permission to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4292-15T1 TIMOTHY R. KELLERS, … things, the following relief. First, plaintiff sought to have defendant contribute toward the tax payments he made … the MSA. He claimed had he known of such debt, he would have not have agreed to the terms of the MSA unless it …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0274-21 CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., … ONE TO GIVE [DEFENDANT] NOTICE WHAT FACTS WERE CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN NOT DISPUTED, FOR PURPOSES OF FUNDAMENTAL … for not doing so. He did neither. And, the judge should have made findings of fact and conclusions of law on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0362-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … degree possession of a weapon by certain persons not to have weapons, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(b)(1) (count … court's "opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1623-21 C.S. O/B/O M.A.L.H., … Cesar Martin Estela, attorney for appellant. Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM Plaintiff C.S. (Caroline … parents of Miguel, filed no papers, did not appear, and have not taken part in any of these proceedings. We …