-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 20, 2024 – Decided April 4, 2024 Before Judges Firko and Vanek. On appeal from an interlocutory … BURGLARY. After careful consideration of the facts and applicable legal principles, we reverse the … him. Approximately thirty minutes later, A.M. heard a noise coming from the kitchen, investigated, and observed …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 27, 2025 – Decided March 10, 2025 Before Judges Natali, Walcott-Henderson, and Vinci. On appeal … folder containing child sexual abuse material (CSAM) on a computer owned by defendant and subsequently seized the … law and the legal consequences that flow from established facts are not entitled to any special deference." Manalapan …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 16, 2025 – Decided February 5, 2026 Before Judges Smith and Berdote Byrne. On appeal from the … 15. Shortly thereafter, on December 9, 2022, Mario filed a complaint in the Chancery Division, Probate Part, seeking to … find that "there is no genuine issue as to any material fact challenged and that the moving party is entitled to a …
-
njcourts.gov
… and the records of this proceeding. R. 1:38-3(d)(12). NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … counsel was substituted. After a short continuance, retrial commenced on November 1, 2023, before a different judge. On … extensive opinion thoroughly addressed all four statutory factors for termination and need not be repeated in detail …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 15, 2025 – Decided December 1, 2025 Before Judges Susswein and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … Encore teachers (Health and 4 A-0889-24 Physical Education, Computer, Art, Music, Technology, etc.) shall have a minimum … Court has made clear that "an arbitrator may 'weav[e] together' all those provisions [in a contract] that bear on …
-
njcourts.gov
… 225 RIVER ROAD DFT 2017, LLC, Defendants-Appellants. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … to confirm the award. Plaintiffs were developers of a complex real estate project that had substantial commercial, … did fall within the scope of [the arbitrator's] charge. In fact, the [c]ourt does not find that any of the factors in …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 5, 2025 – Decided November 14, 2025 Before Judges Firko and Perez Friscia. On appeal from the … record regarding plaintiff's middle initial. We rely on the complaint and intend no disrespect. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … -35. Defendant argues the trial court erred in finding he committed the predicate act of sexual assault and that an …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … the trial court's October 30, 2024 order dismissing his complaint against defendant A.S. filed pursuant to the … defendant there both had parental rights. Id. at 390. The facts here are not analogous. Not only does defendant not …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 10, 2025 – Decided January 27, 2026 Before Judges Mayer and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior … no abuse of discretion, we affirm. I. We summarize the key facts and procedural history at issue in this appeal. On April 10, 2019, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant in Pennsylvania's Court of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 25, 2026 – Decided March 10, 2026 Before Judges Gummer and Paganelli. On appeal from the … from orders granting defendant Joshua Simmons's motion to compel production of the mental-health and psychiatric … though A.L. had not received notice of it and by making factual findings based representations about a document it …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 22, 2026 – Decided February 23, 2026 Before Judges Vanek and Jacobs. On appeal from the Superior … and well-reasoned oral opinion. I. We recount the salient facts from the record. On October 16, 2020, defendant … defendant's PCR petition for the reasons set forth in his comprehensive oral opinion. The judge considered each of the …
njcourts.gov
… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS ____________________________ SUPERIOR … NO. F-7201-19 GOSHEN MORTGAGE LLC AS SEPARATE TRUSTEE FOR GDBT I TRUST 2011-1, Plaintiff(s), OPINION v. NANCY … is denied in part and granted in part. I. Findings of Fact 2 Plaintiff initiated the above-referenced foreclosure …
default
… Submitted March 7, 2019 – Decided April 30, 2019 Before Judges Simonelli and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … A. Monahan, Acting Union County Prosecutor, attorney for appellant (Michele C. Buckley, Special Deputy Attorney … Court has held: Appellate review of a motion judge's factual findings in a suppression hearing is highly …
default
… Submitted May 2, 2019 – Decided June 21, 2019 Before Judges Simonelli and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … 12-02-0292. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Adam W. Toraya, Designated Counsel, on the … ATTORNEY WAS INEFFECTIVE IN FAILING TO PRESENT MITIGATING FACTORS AT THE TIME OF SENTENCE. POINT II THE COURT …
default
… NO. A-4124-16T4 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR SASCO 2007-WF2, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RUI AMARAL, … should have been granted because he was not served with the complaint, and plaintiff did not have the right to … he had not been served with the initial complaint. The facts recited in a proof of service are presumed true, and …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5621-15T4 DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS TRUSTEE FOR RESIDENTIAL ACCREDIT LOANS, INC., MORTGAGE ASSET - … legal principles, we affirm. We discern the following facts and procedural history from the record on appeal. On …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 9, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Ostrer. On appeal from the Superior … order denied defendant's motion for reconsideration. In the comments contained in that order, the judge referred to an … motion papers and opposition.2 Even allowing for the fact that defendant is self-represented, we have no choice …
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 30, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher, Fasciale and Sumners. On appeal from … $98,500. Judge Mary K. Costello analyzed the undisputed facts, entered the order, and rendered an extensive written … the amount of money it would have received had defendant complied with his contractual obligation to pay the balance …
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3536-16T3 JONATHAN NEWCOMB, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANN M. ASPELL, … Submitted February 14, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Currier. On appeal from Superior … the attorney to the Disciplinary Review Board except where facts are alleged that: 3 A-3536-16T3 (1) any member of the …
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 12, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … FRO hearing conducted on November 9, 2015 before Judge Bridget A. Stecher. The record shows plaintiff O.K. was at the … by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that defendant committed the predicate act of harassment, a petty …