Filters
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3064-18T3 BOOTH MOVERS LTD, … 561. On appeal, Booth argues that two of the exceptions we have identified militate in favor of imposing corporate … ever receive or retain any monthly rent from Booth. As we have indicated, DFH did not even exist when Booth entered …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4275-18T4 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL … that defendants defaulted in July 2012. Defendant may have ceased making monthly payments before that time. The … 439 N.J. Super. 273, 276 (App. Div. 2015). We, however, have held that HAMP does not pre-empt valid state law claims …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0802-18T1 J.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … for [C.D.'s] visitation" by stating "she did not have a vehicle" when defendant "witnessed her drive up in … to speak. They're investigating, doing interviews, and what have you. The judge further noted that if there was …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2888-18T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … judge's] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … may, without a warrant, temporarily detain a person if they have a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the person …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2682-18T2 LIONELL G. MILLER, Appellant, … in not giving him a polygraph examination, which would have 7 A-2682-18T2 exposed inconsistencies in Saucedo's … 79, 83 (App. Div. 1997) (concluding the appellant did not "have the right to a polygraph test," citing N.J.A.C …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0747-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. He was …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANDRE L. URLIN (17-12-1220, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3638-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … from defendant's counsel for his failure to appear. We have considered defendant's written arguments as set forth … vague and his motion to dismiss the indictment should have been granted as a result. We disagree because there was …
- MADHUBALA AGARWAL VS. MARVIN SIMMS, ET AL. (LT-007386-18, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3733-18T2 MADHUBALA AGARWAL, … followed. On appeal, plaintiff argues the court should have enforced the judgment of possession and relocation … at its inception, or even thereafter, where the tenants have been residing in the premises for almost five years, …
- LARRY PRICE VS. MARTIN MARTINETTI, ET AL. (L-4271-18, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4434-18T4 LARRY PRICE, … had applied for a one[-]year extension, that would have been enough to carry [it] into the extension period which would have extended the approval until [December 31, 2016].[5] If …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0292-19T2 A-0317-19T2 IN THE MATTER OF … when the decision sought in a matter, when rendered, can have no practical effect on the existing controversy[.]" In … N.J. Super. 254, 257–58 (App. Div. 2006)). Since appellants have been discharged, there is no existing controversy. …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1831-19 PAUL OLIVEIRA and ADRIANA … and Adriana Oliveira, appellants pro se. Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM Plaintiffs Paul and … 801(c) (defining hearsay). However, it conceivably may have been 7 A-1831-19 admissible as a business record, if …
- COURTNEY BUNCH VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3978-19 COURTNEY BUNCH, Appellant, v. … court is '"whether the findings made could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in … requested representation by counsel and waived his right to have his hearing conducted within the fourteen- day …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MOHAMED BAYOUMI (18-10-1418, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0163-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … The Court held that although the detective should not have "refer[red] to an individual depicted in the … entirely from the victim's description" should not have testified about whether defendant's photo resembled the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3204-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … briefly address Robert's remaining arguments, none of which have merit. Robert's argument that this matter should be … retired. Robert's assertion that Basem's counsel should not have been awarded attorney's fees based on a failure to …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1831-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … days in order to allow the State or the defense to have contact with [the victim] to determine whether or not … In considering motions to withdraw a plea, trial judges have broad discretion. Under Slater, judges are encouraged …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5407-18 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … judge's] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the "feel" of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … that the now self-represented plaintiffs appear to have disregarded in their arguments in this appeal. 5 …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2002-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … indictment with second-degree certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7b(1). Defendant moved to … by [an] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
- T.M.C. VS. M.K.B. (FV-13-0624-21, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1212-20 T.M.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the parties live in separate parts of the county and have no reason or expectation to remain in contact. … that of defendant's—are well supported by the record. As we have already noted, the red marks and swelling on …
- P.C.R. VS. J.H.R. (FV-02-1907-20, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4623-19 P.C.R., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 2C:25-17 to -35. We affirm. The parties are divorced and have two minor children. Following a May 29, 2020 incident, … paying her [child support] . . . [and] that [he] was not to have [the] children for nonpayment." He asserted he went to …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3966-19 DAVID CONNOLLY, Appellant, v. … were of such a nature that any reasonable person would have understood the orders; 3) the orders were loud enough that the entire group could have heard the orders; 4) Connolly had ample time to comply …