-
A-35-24 Reply Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO.: 089547 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO.: A-699-22 Appellate Division Judges: Hon. … is the uncertain expectations of property owners that have no guarantee that the pierhead line outward of their … in the office of the secretary of state, showing what lines have been fixed and established by it for the exterior lines …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2355-21 GIUSEPPE RIBAUDO, … Wendy Terrace." Plaintiff wrote, "I believe that unless you have specific information that the wall is mine, above what … exercise of reasonable diligence and intelligence ought to have known that . . . these facts may . . . create a cause …
-
njcourts.gov
… Gr~ A PNtJ\/AN~. J.S.G, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY CASE NO. 291 MASTER DOCKET NO.: … II. I. CMO 84 Cases. 1. CMO 84 Exhibit X cases that have not been dismissed are to be moving forward with active … middle of active discovery. 11. CMO 84 Exhibit Y cases that have not been dismissed are to be moving forward with active …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0174-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … turn over their money. When the victims said they did not have any money, Miller cocked the gun and struck one of the … could be before the [c]ourt at this stage after appeals have been exhausted, after other issues raised in the two …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3003-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … last criminal sentence, and has remained there since. We have previously affirmed K.W.'s commitment three times: In … treatment. K.W. explains his experience in TC should have led the trial court to conclude discharge was more …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0229-23 L.R.A.R.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, … you had to go back to that fraudulent midget and that you have all these bills to pay. If I would have known that you had returned or gotten back together …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3100-23 A&A CONSTRUCTION GROUP CORP., … We also reject plaintiff's contention that the court should have vacated the award because the arbitrator had a relationship with defendant that should have been disclosed prior to arbitration. N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2740-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … suffered any type of injury that would 6 A-2740-23 have potentially affected his performance on the field … the conclusions of the Law Division judge "could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1418-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … was "normal, mandatory[,] and refusal to participate would have exposed [him] to serious harm for violating." 6 … 246, 270 (2020). We are unpersuaded. Furthermore, as we have noted, the Acevedo Court made clear that "contentions …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0358-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of parole ineligibility for the certain persons not to have weapons offense and concurrent sentences for the other … [DEFENDANT'S] MOTION FOR A REDUCTION OF SENTENCE SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BY THE SENTENCING COURT BECAUSE OF …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0687-22 A.M.M., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … away and told him she was uncomfortable and did not want to have sex. Then defendant lunged at her, grabbed her throat, … defendant to testify. The judge noted defendant did not have a "burden" and was not required to "disprove" the 5 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1622-20 JEFFREY KOSTOPLIS, … a call directing him to check on a vehicle believed to have been involved in a recent shooting. Appellant proceeded … In that regard, appellant contends the ALJ should not have considered whether there was an "unexpected happening;" …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0601-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … AT [CENTRAL JUDICIAL PROCESSING (CJP)], AND POLICE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PROHIBITED FROM INTERROGATI[NG] HIM WITHOUT HIS … stated, "Judge, based on the language barrier, I didn't have a chance to speak with [defendant]." The court then …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3210-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … subsection (2)(a), trial counsel cannot be considered to have been ineffective for not moving to dismiss that count … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Id. at 694. "A reasonable probability …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1096-21 ACTLIEN HOLDING INC., by its … the impact of amending legislation on circumstances that have occurred or have yet to occur, a court must first resort to what the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2463-22 LOURDES GONZALEZ, … now known or unknown, and whether asserted or which could have been asserted against one another or against their … or their respective Related Persons/Entities ever had, now have, or hereafter can, shall, or may have for, upon, or by …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2528-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … judge granted the motion, finding the first judge should have denied the motion without prejudice to await … occurred here, making it highly unlikely any court would have dismissed the indictment on that basis, particularly as …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1994-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … a certification in which he stated that he should not have received an aggregate thirty-nine-year period of parole … to 17." In addition, defendant argued that the court should have merged the aggravated assault of Steele (count fifteen) …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0043-24 JAMES MATHEWSON, … The motion record makes clear that [the divorcing] parties have completely different views of their relationship and … motion was a "motion to dismiss in disguise" and should have been denied on that standard; (3) the motion judge …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3606-23 JULIA ROSE NAWROCKI, … 7 A-3606-23 service at this point[.] But here we do have many [] hundreds and hundreds of invoices charging a … relationship between the 16 A-3606-23 two." Ibid. Courts have generally found causation is established when a …