-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 11, 2020 – Decided March 25, 2020 Before Judges Koblitz and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior … 16-06-1161. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Michael Timothy Denny, Assistant Deputy … The order was entered after the judge analyzed the facts under State v. Henderson, 208 N.J. 208 (2011), …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 7, 2019 – Decided April 30, 2019 Before Judges Simonelli and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … A. Monahan, Acting Union County Prosecutor, attorney for appellant (Michele C. Buckley, Special Deputy Attorney … Court has held: Appellate review of a motion judge's factual findings in a suppression hearing is highly …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 2, 2019 – Decided June 21, 2019 Before Judges Simonelli and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … 12-02-0292. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Adam W. Toraya, Designated Counsel, on the … ATTORNEY WAS INEFFECTIVE IN FAILING TO PRESENT MITIGATING FACTORS AT THE TIME OF SENTENCE. POINT II THE COURT …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 21, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Rothstadt. On appeal from the New … [upon] substantial evidence." We disagree and affirm. The facts derived from the record are summarized as follows. On July 9, 2018, after refusing to comply with correction officers' request that he vacate a …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS ____________________________ SUPERIOR … NO. F-7201-19 GOSHEN MORTGAGE LLC AS SEPARATE TRUSTEE FOR GDBT I TRUST 2011-1, Plaintiff(s), OPINION v. NANCY … is denied in part and granted in part. I. Findings of Fact 2 Plaintiff initiated the above-referenced foreclosure …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 9, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Ostrer. On appeal from the Superior … order denied defendant's motion for reconsideration. In the comments contained in that order, the judge referred to an … motion papers and opposition.2 Even allowing for the fact that defendant is self-represented, we have no choice …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 30, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher, Fasciale and Sumners. On appeal from … $98,500. Judge Mary K. Costello analyzed the undisputed facts, entered the order, and rendered an extensive written … the amount of money it would have received had defendant complied with his contractual obligation to pay the balance …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 12, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … FRO hearing conducted on November 9, 2015 before Judge Bridget A. Stecher. The record shows plaintiff O.K. was at the … by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that defendant committed the predicate act of harassment, a petty …
-
njcourts.gov
… STATE OF NEW JERSEY, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … N.A. in the amount of $787,500 as his father's attorney-in-fact. The note was payable 1 Defendant was named the … Defendant did not repay the loan, and plaintiff filed a complaint for foreclosure in August 2013. Defendant failed …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5621-15T4 DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS TRUSTEE FOR RESIDENTIAL ACCREDIT LOANS, INC., MORTGAGE ASSET - … legal principles, we affirm. We discern the following facts and procedural history from the record on appeal. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… (609) 348-4515 Fax: (609) 348-6834 emuskett@foxrothschild.com Attorneys for Defendants Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme … the correction of deficiencies in the Plaintiff’s Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS). As it pertains to Mr. Grandison, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Management Notice) Case Management Dates a) Trial - as set forth in Case Management Notice b) Discovery Completion - as set forth in Case Management Notice c) Trial … and trial dates. Discovery of the physical and economic facts of the property must be completed by the discovery …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 29, 2022 – Decided February 7, 2023 Before Judges Susswein and Berdote Byrne. On appeal from the … to this appeal and thus we need not recount the relevant facts and NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE … substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Wells 's comprehensive and well-reasoned written opinion. We add the …
njcourts.gov
… Argued June 7, 2023 – Decided June 19, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … August 2, 2021 oral decision. We add the following brief comments. The scope of our review of the Family Part's order … owe substantial deference to the Family Part's findings of fact because of that court's 1 The trial court granted …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 20, 2023 – Decided March 28, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … expressed by the trial judge. We add the following brief comments. See R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). 2 The court issued three … owe substantial deference to the Family Part's findings of fact because of that court's special expertise in family …
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 20, 2024 – Decided August 30, 2024 Before Judges Gilson and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … of plaintiff's fees; instead, she expressed dissatisfaction with plaintiff's representation. The fee arbitration committee rejected defendant's arguments and awarded …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 23, 2024 – Decided May 8, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Haas. On appeal from the … for the reasons stated by the trial court in its comprehensive written decision issued on August 23, 2022. We … owe substantial deference to the Family Part's findings of fact because of that court's special expertise in family …
default
… DOCKET NO. A-0713-17T1 IN THE MATTER OF QUALIFICATION FOR NEW JERSEY TRANSIT POLICE, ONEIL TORRES- FALTO. … Submitted October 25, 2018 – Decided April 30, 2019 Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from the New … cited in his August 4, 2017 letter were inapposite to the facts in this matter. On October 13, 2017, appellant filed a …
default
… Submitted January 24, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Mawla. On appeal from Superior Court … on February 21, 2017, and April 7, 2017. The background facts are set forth in detail in Judge De La Cruz's opinion … warrant discussion, except as noted in the following brief comments. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). We agree with Judge De La Cruz …
default
… Submitted January 9, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Reisner. On appeal from the Board of … in Spanish with an English translation – also stated facts that, if true, would constitute a meritorious defense … of the amount of time that has elapsed, and to create a complete record for any possible further appeal, we order …