-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1757-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … not reasons"). We found "nothing in the record that would have supported the proper admission of the lieutenant's … B) a newly discovered factual predicate, which could not have been earlier discovered through reasonable diligence; …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3004-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial." Ibid. Having considered …
-
njcourts.gov
… CORP., et al Defendants SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY In re ZOSTAVAX MCL Code 629 DOCKET … CORP., et al Defendants SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY In re ZOSTAVAX MCL Code 629 DOCKET … ADMINISTER OATHS UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS You have been appointed and are hereby authorized and empowered, …
-
njcourts.gov
… OF NEW JERSEY IN RE: PELVIC MESH/GYNECARE LITIGATION LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY CASE NO. 291 Fl LED APR g5 2019 … counsel is permitted to appear telephonically; in order to have your appearance on the record, it is counsel's …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1651-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … because his attorney did not inform him that he could have accepted an offer by the State to plead guilty in … unprofessional error, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'" State v. Castagna, 187 N.J. 293, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1834-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … in which he argued that his sentencing counsel should have argued for additional mitigating factors. We review the … issue was previously decided on the direct appeal or could have been raised on that direct appeal). Moreover, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… I talked to Ashley – Recommended I [resend] my tax appeal – Have not hear anything from [the Tax Court]. [Had] to … plaintiff writes that after learning that the court did not have his appeal, he “copied and sent original receipt from … as of the date the judgment is mailed, subject to the provisions of R. 1:3-3.” R. 8:4-1(a)(2). For the period at …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1686-23 FRANCISCO VILLEGAS, a/k/a … 2025. Consistent with that information, we learned and have confirmed that Villegas was released on parole on … Because neither side supplemented the record, we do not have before us the precise date of the October hearing or a …
-
njcourts.gov
… time frame nor were they offered the opportunity to have it read to them, so that either their memories could be … 2008, [the date of orientation] the grand jury could not have applied MON-18-004915 07/06/2025 8:26:24 PM Pg 2 of 4 … First, the prosecutor in the above-quoted passage should have referenced “Section 2C:14–2c(1) through (4)”, not …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2122-24 ZACHARY L. KRAMER, … the judgment or order and which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under … it is no longer equitable that the judgment or order should have prospective application; or (f) any other reason …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1851-24 MARIETTA ATKINSON, … of divorce. On October 17, 2024, defendant moved to have the judge recuse himself, alleging judicial bias. … whether "a reasonable, fully informed person [would] have doubts about the judge's impartiality." DeNike v. Cupo, …
-
njcourts.gov
… investigation to determine whether unethical conduct may have occurred and, if so, whether there is sufficient … nonetheless remain confidential. Disciplinary officials have a duty to maintain the confidentiality of the system … the matter. Since August of 2020, all disciplinary hearings have proceeded virtually utilizing the Zoom platform due to …
-
A-47-24 Appellate Division Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… No. A-1275-22 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY : CUMBERLAND COUNTY … of Butler as the seller, stating that he “may or may not have been him,” and explaining that he only “vaguely” … the shotgun-wielding outlaw. Any such comparison would have been grossly prejudicial in line with State v. …
-
A-50-24 - Appellate Division Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… : : July 28, 2023 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2638-22T2 CRIMINAL ACTION ON APPEAL FROM … (15T 49-19 to 25). Falzon testified that Sharp would have died within a minute of the infliction of the fatal … at 1:50 a.m. with something in his hand, which could have been a shirt. (18T 73-1 to 76-1; 19T 187-10 to 188-21). …
-
A-0466-24 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Superior Court of New Jersey APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-000466-24T4 CIVIL ACTION 90 HACKENSACK … 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS 5 POINT I – NO REASONABLE JURY COULD HAVE CONCLUDED THAT APONTE RELIED ON THE SOFTWARE GENERATED … which isn’t fair. To my knowledge, at this point, we do not have to change anything on the contract at all but I will …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1882-19T3 ANGELO ARENA, … away. For that reason[,] I'm dismissing your complaint. You have failed to prove any cause of action cognizable in any … the proceedings contrary to the Rules of Court. We have reviewed the record, including the video evidence, and …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0490-20 EUGENE VILLARREAL, … to Rule 6:3-4 and N.J.S.A. 2A:18-53. Villarreal may have recourse in another type of proceeding, but he simply … damages under this docket number. Villarreal could not have been granted possession of the premises in any event, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4966-18T3 ROBERT J. TRIFFIN, … Robert J. Triffin, appellant pro se. Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION … We need not comment here on whether Triffin would have had remedies against other parties, including but not …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1108-19 A-1128-19 WOOLWICH COMMONS, LLC, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester County, Docket No. L-0011-19. Nehmad, …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives
Disciplinary Committee Members Representing Respondents in Ethics Proceedings March 9, 1990 Issued by: Stephen W. Townsend Clerk, Supreme Court The Supreme Court has adopted a policy prohibiting members of Supreme Court committees who serve in the …