default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1905-18T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF I.O., SVP-440-06. … Argued May 14, 2019 – Decided May 24, 2019 Before Judges Fisher, Hoffman and Suter. On appeal from … reason for second-guessing the experienced judge's fact findings. Affirmed. … IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL …
default
… Submitted April 3, 2019 – Decided April 17, 2019 Before Judges Koblitz, Currier and Mayer. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … services to defendant in 2011, but defendant was unable to complete any program. He did not attend seven of the nine … 154 N.J. 394, 411-12 (1998), and we are bound by his factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient …
default
… Submitted February 6, 2019 – Decided April 16, 2019 Before Judges Ostrer and Currier. On appeal from Superior … necessary to cure the default by the required date. A complaint for foreclosure was filed February 22, 2017. … we must, we fail to discern any genuine issues of material facts. R. 4:46-2(c). Plaintiff demonstrated its standing to …
default
… Argued March 4, 2019 – Decided March 21, 2019 Before Judges Messano and Fasciale. On appeal from Superior … Mark P. Asselta, on the briefs). PER CURIAM In this commercial landlord-tenant case, the Landlord (defendant) … oral argument, even though there existed disputed facts. We 1 In its Notice of Appeal (NOA), defendant …
default
… ORTIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PERSONAL SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Good2Go Auto Insurance Company, … Argued March 5, 2019 – Decided March 20, 2019 Before Judges Fisher and Hoffman. On appeal from Superior … judgment because there was no dispute about any material fact. See Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 142 N.J. …
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 2, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz, Rothstadt and Sumners. On appeal from … defendant Borough of Roseland's police department, filed a "complaint in lieu of prerogative writ[s], pursuant to Rule … plaintiff's termination was warranted. The salient facts are not in dispute and are summarized as follows. …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 19, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Simonelli. On appeal from Superior … pro se. Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Garima Joshi, Deputy Attorney General, of … to correct an illegal sentence. We will not recite the facts that led to defendant's conviction. Instead, we …
njcourts.gov
… v. COUNTY OF ESSEX, Third-Party Defendant- Appellant. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Submitted April 25, 2017 - Decided Before Judges Reisner and Mayer. On appeal from the Office of … We affirm the Attorney General's decisions. The relevant facts are undisputed. While driving a county- owned vehicle, …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 5, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Rothstadt. On appeal from the … note. On October 30, 2014, plaintiff filed a foreclosure complaint. Defendant filed an answer and asserted eleven … This argument lacks merit. Our review of a trial court's fact-finding in a non-jury case is limited. Seidman v. …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 3, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Moynihan. On appeal from Superior … counters that defendant's sentence as a third offender complied with the Frye decision. We agree that defendant's … law and the legal consequences that flow from established facts are not entitled to any special deference." Manalapan …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 31, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Mayer. On appeal from Superior Court … THE PCR COURT DENIED RELIEF WITHOUT STATING FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. POINT TWO: MS. PELZER IS … years of parole ineligibility would prevent defendant from committing future murders. See N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1(b)(8). We …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 25, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Nugent. On appeal from Superior … No. 15-10-1273. Thomas Carroll Blauvelt, attorney for appellant (Aqua G. Etuk, on the brief). Gurbir S. … that the prosecutor has carefully considered the facts in light of the relevant law." State v. Wallace, 146 …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 7, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … mother was involved with illegal drugs. Defendant did not comply with court-ordered services and advised the Division … N.J. 394, 412 (1998), and we are 4 A-4968-15T2 bound by her factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient …
njcourts.gov
… v. JOSE CATANHO and SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendants- Respondents. … Submitted February 28, 2017 - Decided Before Judges Reisner and Sumners. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … a certification that, on its face, created a material factual dispute as to whether Alina knew about Tony's plans. …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 25, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Leone. On appeal from the Superior … reunification therapy on a weekly basis. The order also: compelled plaintiff to produce the child for therapy when … household and . . . the children." Further considering the fact that the judge rightly recognized that the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5110-15T3 IN THE MATTER OF A PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF MARTIN V. CARLUCCIO. … FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF HIS CRIMINAL RECORD AND DOES IN FACT SUPPORT HIS MOTION. THE STATE'S ARGUMENT RELIES ON … POINT VI[I] [N.J.S.A.] 2C:52-8 SPECIFIES STATEMENTS TO ACCOMPANY A PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT WHICH REFERENCE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 4, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Koblitz, Manahan and Suter. On appeal from … difficulty staying awake during some visits. Although recommended for in-patient treatment, defendant was not … Cesare, 154 N.J. 394, 412 (1998), and we are bound by his factual findings so long as they are supported by sufficient …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 20, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Haas. On appeal from Superior … monetary sanctions upon her for her repeated failure to comply with previous orders of the court. We affirm. NOT FOR … this case because there was no dispute as to any material fact. Hand v. Hand, 391 N.J. Super. 102, 105 (App. Div. …
default
… Argued January 14, 2019 – Decided January 31, 2019 Before Judges Sabatino, Haas and Mitterhoff. (Judge Sabatino … 30 N.J. Tax 41 (Tax Ct. 2017).1 We add the following brief comments concerning the argument raised by plaintiff in … and application of tax statutes following its review of the facts and the law governing a particular issue. Having …
default
… JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2774-17T2 MCDONALD INFORMATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. IKNOW, LLC (a Delaware Limited Liability Company), Defendant-Appellant, and INCODA CORP., LLC (a … comprehensive written opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court found plaintiff …