default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0368-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … a judgment of conviction by raising issues that could not have been raised on direct appeal and, therefore, ensures … concedes this point, and contends "the PCR court should have taken notice of PCR counsel's obvious deficient …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1118-16T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … et al., Static-99 Coding Rules Revised-2003 5 (2003). [We have] explained that actuarial information, including the … offenders over the age of [seventy] should be assumed to have low risk." In contrast to Dr. Sahni, Dr. Kunz did not …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0870-17T2 Ra.T., Plaintiff-Respondent, … call the police. Roberta said that defendant, who did not have a key to the home, would sometimes come to the house … orders she had sought against defendant, but it might have been "two or three." 5 A-0870-17T2 Finally, R.T. …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2591-17T2 SUCHARITHA PATI, … same community theater group. Defendant stated he would not have consented to the umpire's selection, had he known of … reflected his partiality. Defendant's allegations should have come as no surprise. He and his counsel claimed bias in …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0188-17T1 R.W., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … I. Defendant and R.W. were married in November 2011, and have one child, a daughter born in September 2012.1 In 2014, … defendant asserts that 8 A-0188-17T1 he did not have notice of those matters because they were not expressly …
default
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … is obvious. Unquestionably it was not intended to have the effect of shortening the time prescribed by the … not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. The order did not have the effect of adding days to any statute of …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0979-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … supplemental brief. Nor do we consider the State's brief to have raised any unexpected or novel facts or arguments. The … It is difficult to conclude that defendant's counsel would have been surprised by any of those facts or arguments. With …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3285-20 PETER CHIAROLANZIO in his … for the plaintiff; the basis of the prior dismissal orders have not been cured, i.e. the no show fee and the expert … the judgment or order and which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0770-20 T.M.H., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that she was "cheating." Plaintiff went downstairs "to just have peace." Defendant followed her. Plaintiff picked up … was "straightforward in her testimony[,]" and that "she did have candor and general believability with regard to what …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0270-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … criminal laws that the Legislature intended them to have prospective application only. Ibid. Consistent with the … recent decisions, our Supreme Court held that statutes that have an immediate or future effective date evidence the …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4297-19 W.S.H., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the September 13, 2019 order. Although the appeal did not have the effect of staying the September 13, 2019 order, see … it to enforce orders that are the subject of an appeal and have not been stayed. In addition, relying on Rule 1:10-3, …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0810-20 Z.A.S.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, … called his mother. The parties married in 2015 and have two children. In August 2019, plaintiff filed for … wanted him to go to Jamaica because she believed she would have peace while he was away. When defendant returned from …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1869-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … The Item Before Determining It Was Contraband.2 We have considered defendant's contentions, including those … were 1 Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 (1968). 2 We have altered the capitalization of defendant's Subpoints A …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5171-18 A-0911-19 RUTGERS, THE STATE … for appellant (Daniel A. Berger on the brief). Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM In these one-sided, … 6 A-5171-18 Russell, who admitted his liability, should not have entailed a significant amount of legal services. The …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3637-19 ORIAN JOHNSON, … is often confused with an option to purchase but, as we have explained, they are materially different: An ordinary … the premises"; upon receiving such a notice, Johnson would have thirty days to give the prior owner "written notice . . …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0169-20 C.F.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … C.F.A. were married on December 19, 2019. The couple do not have any children together, but C.F.A. has a … not credible. The judge's entire opinion is as follows: I have -- I've made the finding that the plaintiff [C.F.A.] is …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2858-18T4 NORMAN OSTROW, INC., … Savio D. Figaro, attorney for appellant. Respondents have not filed briefs. PER CURIAM In this landlord/tenant … Fawzy's tenancy. It found the contention that Fawzy "may have lived in other buildings and continues to live in other …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3942-18T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of "some type of conflict that the public defender would have in the case." Regarding defendant's case, Poindexter … documents involved in [defendant's] matter," counsel "would have learned plea counsel was not Ms. Manning, but rather …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3410-18T3 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … certification that the decedent intended each son to have "one of the two family properties." Peter disputed … But "[w]hether delivery and acceptance [of a deed] have taken place . . . is a matter of intention." Ibid. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4120-23 NAFEE COTMAN, Appellant, v. NEW … identified by the initials D.A. who purportedly "would have 6 A-4120-23 provided testimonial evidence relevant to … that the requirements of the substantial evidence rule have been satisfied. Application of the substantial evidence …