Filters
- A-5018-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5018-15T2 STAPLE SEWING AIDS PENSION … the court's decision sought in a matter, when rendered, can have no practical effect on the existing controversy." Redd … is available. Also, even if redemption were considered to have rendered the dispute over the amount due moot, we would …
- A-0111-22 - CHRISTINA LAPAGLIA VS. KELLI CIANCAGLINI (DC-003106-21, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0111-22 CHRISTINA LAPAGLIA, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester County, Docket No. DC-003106-21. Ronald … N.J.S.A. 46:8-21.1). 7 A-0111-22 To the extent that we have not addressed Lapaglia's remaining arguments, we …
- njcourts.gov… and the city he led on the ground that the mayor should not have pursued his lawsuit against his city and the officials … were tainted by conflicts of interest when they agreed to have the city pay him a lot of money, $850,000, to settle. … on the property, but also probable zoning changes or subdivision. Irval Realty, Inc. v. Bd. Of Public Utilities …
- A-0472-21 – ALTON NICHOLS VS. DUKE LINDEN, LLC, ET AL. (L-0971-18, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0472-21 ALTON NICHOLS, … adequacy" of plaintiff's expert report, the judge should have conducted an N.J.R.E. 104 hearing instead of dismissing … N.J. at 187. The treating physician's failure, however, to have considered plaintiff's decades-long history of …
- A-3461-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CATHERINE ALBERT (MA-02-2023, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3461-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE HER GUILTY PLEA SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED ON DE NOVO REVIEW PREDICATED UPON THE … to assuring that the criteria for a valid plea of guilty have been met."). [Gregory, 220 N.J. at 419-20.] 6 A-3461-22 …
- A-2078-22 – JOSEPH W. LANCASTER VS. JODY A. LANCASTER (FM-13-1213-21, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2078-22 JOSEPH W. LANCASTER, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Monmouth County, Docket No. … to sell the trailer as the title owner, and therefore, we have no cause to disturb the judge's ruling. Defendant's …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2773-22 ROBERT RIVERA, … is fixed, unless exceptional circumstances are shown." We have identified four factors to consider when deciding … expert issues took place after fact depositions were to have been completed. The trial court noted correctly that …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3907-21 NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, … allowed hearsay evidence into the record. We have considered these contentions in light of the record and … the Board erroneously reached a conclusion that could not have been reasonably made based on the relevant facts. …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1400-22 HIGHVIEW TERRACE APARTMENTS, … in a public housing unit and the judgment of possession may have residual legal consequences, his appeal is not moot. We … in denying defendant's motion. 7 A-1400-22 To the extent we have not addressed any of defendant's remaining arguments, …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0172-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE HIS GUILTY PLEA SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED ON DE NOVO REVIEW PREDICATED UPON THE … ON MARCH 30, 2015 IN ACCORDANCE WITH R. 7:6-2(a)(1). We have considered this contention in light of the record, the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0839-23 MARIO D. LAWSON, Appellant, v. … re Arenas, 385 N.J. Super. 440, 443-44 (App. Div. 2006). We have also recognized that the Legislature has provided the … credible evidence in the record . To the extent we have not specifically addressed any of Lawson's other …
- M.J.M. VS. M.E.P. (FV-16-2677-23, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1161-23 M.J.M.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Passaic County, Docket No. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SINCERE DANIELS (22-06-1475, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2388-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … and basis of knowledge needed for an officer to have the reasonable suspicion required for a stop." The … With nothing more than the anonymous tip, Resendes did not have "an articulable [and reasonable] suspicion that …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0467-22 EDWARD FARLEY AIZEN, … "victims' records, except that a victim of a crime shall have access to the victim's own records." 5 A-0467-22 and he … demonstrate an exception for disclosure. To the extent we have not specifically addressed any of Aizen's remaining …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. AGUSTIN GARCIA (00-06-1368, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1913-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … A-1913-21 ON THE AUDIO OF THE VIDEOTAPE AND FOR FAILING TO HAVE AN EXPERT TESTIFY AT TRIAL. We affirmed denial of the … for PCR are not vehicles to repeatedly raise claims that have previously been adjudicated. Rule 3:22-5 provides: [a] …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KEITH I. HUNT (22-03-0293, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2042-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 2C:39-5(b)(1). He contends the gun seized by police should have been suppressed. After carefully reviewing the record … issue for our consideration: THE SUPPRESSION MOTION SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BECAUSE [DEFENDANT'S] FLIGHT WAS NOT …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0864-22 IN THE MATTER OF PETITION TO … with a certified statement that a weapon's owner may have a statutory disability under N.J.S.A. 2C:58-3(c). Here … a meaningful hearing may take place. To the extent we have not addressed the State's other arguments we deem them …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1283-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE AMENDED AND … Carlos Hernandez Revocable Trust, and Stuart Reiser have not filed a brief. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … awarding Cevasco's fees in their entirety. To the extent we have not specifically addressed any other contentions raised …
- JOHN HUGHES VS. TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL, ET AL. (L-1050-22, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2562-21 JOHN HUGHES, … as I see the others filled out the same. Also[,] they only have a single name on top of the signature pages. Could you … "Our intent was at the time of signature and remains now to have signed for all three candidates running as a group …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. VICTOR A. ROSARIO (22-09-0840, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1870-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … behind the bar and that "Greg" had told him that he would have heroin for sale on Monday, March 1, 1976. The warrant … the situation coupled with the ease with which Ybarra could have disposed of the illegal substance. We are unable to …