-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0303-22 STATE IN THE INTEREST OF H.M., a … 1:38-3(d)(8). 3 A-0303-22 interpreted this as a threat to have a higher authority intervene in the matter. Officer … careless driving was insufficient. POINT II POLICE DID NOT HAVE A RE[A]SONABLE AND ARTICULABLE SUSPICION TO BELIEVE …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2877-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … that the factual predicate for the relief sought could not have been discovered earlier through the exercise of … sought was discovered, if that factual predicate could not have been discovered earlier through the exercise of …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3636-21 JOHN DOE 1, Plaintiff-Appellant, … alleged abuse of plaintiff. Therefore, New Jersey does not have personal jurisdiction over the Archdiocese related to … Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316-17 (1945). We have recently published two opinions that set forth the law …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2367-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … defendant had no prior indictable convictions, but he did have three prior DUI convictions, one in Florida from 1992 … decision, but whether the prosecutor's decision could not have been reasonably made upon weighing the relevant …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5349-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … . . . . 8 A-5349-15T2 [N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.21(c)(4).] Courts have interpreted the phrase "failed to exercise a minimum … the applicable law. Although we appreciate defendant may have been coping with difficult circumstances, it did not …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5540-15T1 U.S. BANK NATIONAL … to relief under Rule 4:50-1(a) is one the parties could not have protected themselves from during trial. DEG, LLC v. … and they failed to show there was a mistake they could not have protected themselves from during trial as well as …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2656-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … the worker in the hospital that she wanted someone else to have full custody of the babies and wanted to "sign her … of twins were too young at the time of the evaluation to have developed a secure bond with their resource parents, …
-
njcourts.gov
… for which no review is sought to the same freeze provisions that apply to a final judgment of the Tax Court. … final after the assessing dates for the freeze years have passed and application to invoke the Act is required. … law. It does not represent a finding of value. The courts have consistently denied application of the Act where …
-
njcourts.gov
… LLC, Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. BER-L-6069-19 Civil Action … research and development. Process Tech and Wormser have been parties to a contract since October 13, 2016, in … in Bergen County. On October 25, 2019, Wormser moved to have the complaint dismissed on multiple grounds. In …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0395-21 FALLIVENE AGENCY, INC., … contract and closing. Hill submits Fallivene also did not have any contract or listing agreement with Hill and … contemplates each owner of the various parcels would have separate agreements with Fallivene. It is undisputed …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4774-15T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … from the car and we had to exert more pressure on him to have him stay at the car. 5 A-4774-15T3 The officers placed … 8 A-4774-15T3 errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Id. at 694. As noted, defendant argues …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4941-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … L.M. reported that he was unemployed and did not have a valid driver's license. He wanted to regain his … parents as he has never lived with either of them. They have never cared for him and he does not see either of them …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5244-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … motion. The court found the prosecutor "appears to have considered and weighed all relevant factors in this … except . . . . However, in such cases, the applicant shall have the opportunity to present to the criminal division …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1750-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … THE WINDOWS MAGNIFIER APPLICATION, THE TRIAL COURT SHOULD HAVE PRECLUDED THE STATE FROM USING THE APPLICATION. A. The … the Windows Magnifier application, the trial court should have barred the State from using the application at trial as …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2824-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of that refusal . Instead, he contends he "would have made more arguments as to why the [S]tate did not meet … On that record, we perceive no prejudice. To the extent we have not commented on any arguments raised by defendant that …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0033-23 DONALD MUENZER, … intentions. The judge further stated that each party would have ten days to decide if they wanted to match or outbid … the party who presented the highest bid. Each party would have an opportunity to match and outbid the other. "[T]he …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3437-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … of those facts, her legal conclusions are unassailable. We have duly considered, and reject, defendant's arguments that … even those of his or her parents. 6 A-3437-22 Children have their own rights, including the right to a permanent, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2034-22 EVELYN E. MOUROUNAS, … and manifest an intention to be bound by those terms, they have created an enforceable contract." Id. at 435. "Where … Spa, the settlement is not enforceable. To the extent we have not addressed any remaining arguments, it is because …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0210-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … a controversy no longer exists, and the disputed issues have become moot." Betancourt v. Trinitas Hosp., 415 N.J. … when the decision sought in a matter, when rendered, can have no practical effect on the existing controversy." …
njcourts.gov
… case. The Court affirms the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge … In June 2021, DNA taken from defendant was found to have a high probability of matching the DNA from S.N.’s … with the same crime in 1997, the charge would clearly have been time-barred under the statute of limitations in …