-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2385-16T2 MD SASS MUNICIPAL FINANCE … against the original mortgagee[,]" but appellant does not "have a right to ask this Court to award [him] monies from surplus funds which stand in lieu of property." We have no basis to disturb the motion judge's ruling. …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2046-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, … 3, 5). The boys are now eight and almost ten years old and have been in the care of their resource parents, defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5271-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … declared that "[e]ach municipal court in this State shall have at least one municipal prosecutor appointed by the … his reasoning, that defendant was not entitled to have the charges against him dismissed because they were …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4404-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Municipal Appeal No. MA- 2019-006. … Law Division and argued the municipal court judge should have recused himself, pursuant to Rule 1:12-1(d) and (g), …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5593-17T4 MAURICE ANDERSON, Appellant, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … to confront the officers involved in the incident and have them submit to a polygraph. Anderson pleaded not guilty …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3591-18T4 ALEXEI LEGASSOV, Appellant, v. … his cell. The hearing officer found that Legassov could not have obtained the amount of sugar that he possessed by … is cited in the disciplinary report but that the inmate may have committed another prohibited act, the Adjustment …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4982-17T3 ULTIMATE HOLDING, LLC, … permitting diligence, to do what in law should have been done." Lavin v. Bd. of Educ. of Hackensack, 90 … efficiency with the equitable notion that courts should have authority to avoid an unjust result in any given …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5325-17T2 ROSA M. WILLIAMS-HOPKINS, on … party has "the right to litigate any claim in court or have a jury trial on that claim." The Agreement applies to … may not decide an arbitrability question that the parties have delegated to an arbitrator." Henry Schein, Inc. v. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2599-17T2 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON … Super. 323, 350 (Ch. Div. 2010) ("[L]itigants generally have no standing to assert the rights of third parties."); … the balance of defendant's arguments, to the extent we have not addressed them, to be without sufficient merit to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1387-18T3 ROBERT HANKINS, Appellant, v. … on the two- member panel's decision: [Hankins] continues to have limited understanding of his behavior and may benefit … when denying Hankins parole. 8 A-1387-18T3 To the extent we have not addressed other arguments raised by Hankins, we …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1330-18T3 NEWSTEAD HOLMDEL HOA, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Docket No. L-0163-18. Law Offices … proper notice divested the Board of its jurisdiction. As we have long held, "our appellate courts will decline to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0845-17T4 HILDA T. KENNEDY and JOHN F. … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic County, Docket No. L-1167-15. Hilda T. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1200-17T4 DELCO, LLC, … variance, for which the vote was tied at 3-3. Rather than have the application go down to defeat, InSite's attorney … argument that the doctrine of judicial estoppel should have barred InSite from changing its method of calculating …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1684-17T2 FULTON BANK OF NEW JERSEY, as … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Somerset County, Docket No. L-0344-16. NOT FOR … . . Kapusta not agreed to guaranty the loan, [JB] would not have received the $200,000[.]" On October 27, 2017, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2064-15T1 RATAN HOTEL PLAZA, LLC, … -49, under which the Redevelopment Plan was adopted, would have silently stripped zoning boards of their 4 A-2064-15T1 … a significant change, "it is far more likely that it would have added language that explicitly" expressed its …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4298-15T1 LISA VAN HORN, … Accurso. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Warren County, Docket No. L-0288-12. Spector Gadon & … comply with any of the rule's detailed requirements should have been fatal to its application for sanctions against Van …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2956-14T3 JENNIFER CORONA, … Gilson. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Special Civil Part, Warren County, Docket No. … for determining the actual economic loss defendant may have sustained as a result of plaintiff's decision to cancel …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1839-15T2 FRANK BLAICHMAN, … to [the] entirety of the litigation, the parties could have fashioned such an agreement. Absent such an agreement, … Work, supra, 396 N.J. Super. at 357. For that reason, we have interpreted N.J.S.A. 2A:23B-25(c) as authorizing an …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1254-15T1 TIMOTHY BLAKE, … v. Saint Barnabas Med. Ctr., 160 N.J. 454, 469 (1999)). We have previously held that in certain instances plaintiffs … facts through discovery so that the trial court will have a record to determine any future motions. Reversed and …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … ABILITY TO CONFRONT THE STATE'S VERSION OF PLAIN VIEW. We have considered this argument in light of the record and the … has the "opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …