-
njcourts.gov
… Argued telephonically May 13, 2020 – Decided June 3, 2020 Before Judges Fuentes, Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the … on the claims submitted. [N.J.S.A. 2A:23B-24(a).] Absent compelling public policy reasons, an arbitrator's errors of law or fact do not provide a trial court with a basis to disturb …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 22, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sumners and Moynihan. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … address they had been served at for the initial foreclosure complaint as well as all subsequent correspondence and … Judge Goodzeit found there were "no arguments, case law, or facts to warrant reconsideration of" the summary judgment …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 17, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … to his conviction and that it could affect his ability to become a citizen in the future should he so desire. Counsel … defendant. Judge Jacobs issued an order denying PCR together with a written decision finding that defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 14, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Currier. On appeal from Superior … agreement arising out of a dispute over rent due under a commercial lease. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL … were made and received and accepted by [Jet Star]. In fact, it is undisputed that the last payment made on May 5, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 17, 2020 – Decided April 1, 2020 Before Judges Fisher and Accurso. On appeal from the Superior … on property then owned by defendants in New Milford, commenced this foreclosure action in October 2017. After … ex rel. USDA v. Scurry, 193 N.J. 492, 505-07 (2008). In fact, in light of the last-minute motion for reconsideration …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 16, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Rothstadt. On appeal from the … COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY FAILING TO CONSIDER THE FOUR FACTORS ANNOUNCED IN STATE V. SLATER, 198 N.J. 145 (2009). … motion court in its order. We only add the following brief comments. Rule 3:21-1 provides that a motion to withdraw a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 29, 2020 — Decided Before Judges Gooden Brown and Mawla. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2018-430. Jacobs & Barbone, PA, … resigned in good standing. We affirm. We summarize the facts, which are addressed in greater detail in the ALJ's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 7, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … 157 N.J. 463, 470-71 (1999). The rule of deference is more compelling where, as here, both judges made concurrent … should not undertake to alter concurrent findings of facts and credibility determinations made by two lower …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 2, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Susswein. On appeal from the … defendant Reginald Anthony of "second-degree conspiracy to commit burglary, N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2 and 2C:18-2(b)(1)[, and] … the judge erred by finding aggravating sentencing factors one and two applied. Id. at 576; see N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 27, 2020 – Decided July 10, 2020 Before Judges Gilson and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … to us by defendant is limited, but the relevant material facts are indisputable. The parties were married in August … 2019 to change where the daughter would go to school and to compel where the daughter would attend summer camp. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 16, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Simonelli. On appeal from the … 2 A-2781-14T2 sex offender as required by N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2e, commonly known as "Megan's Law." Thereafter, defendant moved … ESTABLISHING THAT THE TRIAL COURT IMPROPERLY APPLIED A DE FACTO STRICT LIABILITY STANDARD IN THIS MATTER. We reject …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Respondent-Respondent. … a November 12, 2015 Final Administrative Decision of the Commissioner of the Department of Labor and Workforce … The ABC test consists of the following three factors, all of which an employer must satisfy to qualify …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 8, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Ostrer. On appeal from Superior … issues. We incorporate by reference and do not repeat the factual background previously described in our 2016 opinion. … court granted the State's pre- answer motion to dismiss the complaint under Rule 4:6-2(e), finding that plaintiff's pro …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 27, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … of ineffectiveness lack merit and affirm. The underlying facts and procedural history that resulted in defendant's … of the Middlesex County charges. This letter was accompanied by the requisite forms, N.J.S.A. 2A:159A-3(b), …
-
njcourts.gov
… RAIMAR, LLC and FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. PCR LENDING, LLC, … Submitted February 5, 2018 - Decided Before Judges Accurso and Vernoia. On appeal from Superior … to set aside the settlement based on PCR learning after the fact the motions had been decided in its favor. PCR appeals, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 5, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Ostrer. On appeal from Superior … own affirmative claim. We briefly summarize the pertinent facts and procedural history. Defendant Steven Baglivo … $10,000. Baglivo hired another construction manager to complete 3 A-2444-16T1 the work. Baglivo estimated it cost …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 6, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … and objecting co- 1 Defendant and M.P. also have a child together. 5 A-2431-16T4 occupant, it is objectively … was so infused by those principles that simple fairness compels a remand for further development of the record, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 5, 2022 – Decided January 20, 2022 Before Judges Mayer and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … while intoxicated (DWI), N.J.S.A. 39:4-50. We affirm. The facts are undisputed. In accordance with a plea agreement in … Intoxicated Driver's Resource Center (IDRC), thirty-days community service, and payment of monetary fines and other …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 3, 2022 – Decided January 19, 2022 Before Judges Accurso and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … 3:21-10(b) because of a mistaken belief defendant had not completed his mandatory period of parole ineligibility by … his application and "failed to articulate any findings of fact or conclusions of law that reflects an analysis of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 30, 2021 – Decided October 14, 2021 Before Judges Mawla and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Board … finding he was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c) because he was unable to work. We affirm. We take the following facts from the record including three hearings before the …