-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1533-20 CLIFFORD JEFFERSON1, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-8811-20. Clifford … barred from litigating "all relevant matters that could have been so determined." Watkins, 124 N.J. at 412 (citing …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1827-20 ALLAND LAGUERRE, … is the statement: "IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be duly executed as of the … of the MSA, we conclude the motion judge should not have denied defendant's motion to vacate the FJOD's …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1586-20 IN THE MATTER OF JOHN O'FARRELL, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Somerset County, Docket No. GPA-005-20. Zohn & Zohn, … incidents . . . . However, most of the incidents that have been flagged in the Township's investigation . . . …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1024-20 WALTER TORMASI, Appellant, v. … form ADS. DOC also recognized that multiple federal courts have determined that he was violating the no-business rule. … record as a whole. R. 2:11- 3(e)(1)(D). To the extent we have not addressed them, any remaining arguments raised by …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3250-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … relationship with the foster parents as the children have been in placement for eighteen months and their current caretakers have provided for and are committed to provide for their …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1116-19 MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CO. … opposing papers, defendant claimed that the court did not have personal jurisdiction over him due to defective service … the return date of the turnover motion. A hearing should have been held within seven days. It was not. Instead, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3079-19 R.M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, … to address the penalty issue by June 3, she could have pursued a fair hearing on the June 6 eligibility …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0390-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Had defendant been convicted after trial, he likely would have faced a significantly lengthier sentence in light of … that the five years of parole 8 A-0390-19 supervision would have affected defendant's decision given his sentencing …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0069-19T1 ALBERT WITTIK, … judgment . . . ."). The judge explained that the parties have been divorced for over two years, after a two[-]day … the true purpose of the scheduled [m]otion." We have considered these contentions in light of the record and …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1183-19T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. SVP-667-13. Joseph E. … judge further found that if [W.W.] were released he would have serious difficulty controlling his sexually violent …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2821-18T3 JAMES ORSINI, … PSYCHOLOGIST'S EVALUATION WHEN SHE ORDERED BOTH PARTIES TO HAVE AN EVALUATION BUT ALLOWED RESPONDENT FULL ACCESS AND … OF EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES. POINT VII THE BERGEN COURT JUDGES HAVE ENGAGED IN A PATTERN AND PRACTICE OF REWARDING THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5271-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … declared that "[e]ach municipal court in this State shall have at least one municipal prosecutor appointed by the … his reasoning, that defendant was not entitled to have the charges against him dismissed because they were …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4404-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Municipal Appeal No. MA- 2019-006. … Law Division and argued the municipal court judge should have recused himself, pursuant to Rule 1:12-1(d) and (g), …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5593-17T4 MAURICE ANDERSON, Appellant, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … to confront the officers involved in the incident and have them submit to a polygraph. Anderson pleaded not guilty …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3591-18T4 ALEXEI LEGASSOV, Appellant, v. … his cell. The hearing officer found that Legassov could not have obtained the amount of sugar that he possessed by … is cited in the disciplinary report but that the inmate may have committed another prohibited act, the Adjustment …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1387-18T3 ROBERT HANKINS, Appellant, v. … on the two- member panel's decision: [Hankins] continues to have limited understanding of his behavior and may benefit … when denying Hankins parole. 8 A-1387-18T3 To the extent we have not addressed other arguments raised by Hankins, we …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1330-18T3 NEWSTEAD HOLMDEL HOA, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Docket No. L-0163-18. Law Offices … proper notice divested the Board of its jurisdiction. As we have long held, "our appellate courts will decline to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0845-17T4 HILDA T. KENNEDY and JOHN F. … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic County, Docket No. L-1167-15. Hilda T. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2064-15T1 RATAN HOTEL PLAZA, LLC, … -49, under which the Redevelopment Plan was adopted, would have silently stripped zoning boards of their 4 A-2064-15T1 … a significant change, "it is far more likely that it would have added language that explicitly" expressed its …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3329-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County, Indictment No. 11-08- 1402. Joseph … defendant fails to demonstrate a suppression motion would have any merit, even if counsel had filed one. The record …