-
njcourts.gov
… in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) State v. Tawian Bacome (A-9-15) … challenged S.R.’s removal from the vehicle. The Appellate Division remanded to the trial court, which found that … was in error. The State further argues that police officers have inherent authority to remove passengers from lawfully …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3246-23 A-0457-24 CLAREMONT CONSTRUCTION … conferred upon them in the parties' agreement. When parties have agreed, through a contract, on a defined set of rules … to the sums claimed for unpaid EGP for projects that have been awarded and/or performed. The EGP for these …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2380-20 JIM KWON, Plaintiff, v. MDTV … the "terms not otherwise defined" in the mortgage would have the meaning given to them in the JVA and that, in the … and PGA, 12 A-2380-20 the judge held MDTV and PGA did not have a basis for a claim of a breach of the implied covenant …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0671-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … airplane mode." However, the data on the phone would not have been accessed during that process. Venezia … court's 'opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the "feel" of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0450-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … "[a]n investigatory stop is justified when the police have particularized suspicion," under State v. Chisum, 236 … hearing were "plainly not credible" and should not have been considered. In any event, he contended the …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … N.J.S.A. 54:5-86(a). The earliest plaintiff could have begun foreclosure pursuant to the statute was December … by Rule 4:43-3. And I am satisfied that enough issues have been raised by the moving parties to question the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3078-23 INFERNO ENTERPRISES, LLC and … any[ ]proof should not stand. Plaintiff has no such proof I have asked and nothing has been submitted. Still I have not received mailed or served documents as they state. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2610-23 GAIL STAMLER, … II. We commence our review by defining the task at hand. We have long recognized when adjudicating a matter returning to … to answer was due to excusable neglect and that [they have] a meritorious defense." 1 Rule 4:43-3 is reserved for …
njcourts.gov
… & 130 MORRIS : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LLC, : LAW DIVISION – SPECIAL CIVIL PLAINTIFFS : MONMOUTH COUNTY Vs : … Div. 2012). The --- --- ------------------ 3 Appellate Division has sustained denials of leave to amend “late in the … requires “‘punctilious’ compliance with all of the Act’s provisions, including the notice provisions.” Ibid. (quoting …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0007-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 14, 2020 Law Division order dismissing his appeal 1 We have not been provided a transcript of that video … MUNICIPAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING [DEFENDANT]'S REQUEST TO HAVE COUNSEL APPOINTED FOR HIS [PCR] HEARING IN ABROGATION …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3519-21 SAM'S ROUTE 73, LLC, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No. L-3928-20. Law Offices of … to the outcome of the litigation, just as its joinder would have done, see Manzo v. Shawmut Bank, N.A., 291 N.J. Super. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3746-21 DOROTHY ENRIQUEZ, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No. SC-000453-22. South Jersey … But I'm just telling you, if you believe honestly that you have a habitability claim, you pay the money into court is …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2999-21 MICHAEL ELLIOT ADJMI, AMERICAN … County, Docket No. L-2126-06. Broege, Neumann, Fischer & Shaver, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Timothy P. Neumann and Geoffrey P. Neumann, on the brief). Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM Plaintiff appeals the Law …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3016-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to file a suppression motion, such a motion would not have been successful. Defendant claims defense counsel … after the five- year time limit expired. To the extent we have not addressed them here, the rest of defendant's …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0439-17T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … has been reviewed on numerous occasions in the past, and we have affirmed all those prior orders challenged on appeal. … by [the] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1752-17T4 J.G.K., Plaintiff-Respondent/ … for additional child support. Plaintiff cross-moved to have the court impute additional income to defendant and … this appeal, we first observe that the trial court should have stated reasons for denying the portion of the motion …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4328-17T2 E.F., Petitioner-Appellant, v. … refusal to pay the provider because she did not have a stake in the matter. E.F. now appeals from an April … she had no Medicaid claim. Instead, the provider should have internally appealed from Amerigroup's refusal to pay. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3131-17T1 MIGUEL A. HECTOR, … argues that those were meritorious arguments that should have carried the day. The record does not support any of … he believed he was only required to clean up "whatever I have to report," apparently meaning the soil contamination …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3934-17T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 3:22-4 (with certain exceptions, barring claims that could have been asserted, but were not asserted in prior … had defense counsel requested an adjournment, it would have been denied. Before us, defendant contends his IAC …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1590-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Indictment No. 08-12-1023. Joseph E. … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. …