-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1020-22 COFFEE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF EDGEWATER ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and THREE Y, LLC, Defendants-Respondents. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2480-22 MICHAEL LENZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. __________________________ Argued May 20, 2024 – Decided July 11, …
-
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2825-22 M.R., Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ____________________________ Argued March 6, 2024 …
-
njcourts.gov
… by well-settled principles. "[Our] review of sentencing decisions is relatively narrow and is governed by an abuse … prerequisite for adequate appellate review of sentencing decisions." Cuff, 239 N.J. at 348 (second alteration in …
-
njcourts.gov
… Police Ret. Sys., 194 N.J. 29, 50-51 (2008). Our review of decisions by administrative agencies is limited, with …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2129-15T3 IN THE MATTER OF ANTONIO MARTINEZ, CITY OF ASBURY PARK. _____________________________ Submitted May 16, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Sumners. On appeal from the Civil …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4506-19 TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, a municipal corporation of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SCHEDULE #87, BLOCK 285, LOT 7, ASSESSED TO SENAT, JORAINE, 763 LYONS AVENUE, IRVINGTON, NEW JERSEY …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4506-19 TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, a municipal corporation of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SCHEDULE #87, BLOCK 285, LOT 7, ASSESSED TO SENAT, JORAINE, 763 LYONS AVENUE, IRVINGTON, NEW JERSEY …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2129-15T3 IN THE MATTER OF ANTONIO MARTINEZ, CITY OF ASBURY PARK. _____________________________ Submitted May 16, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Sumners. On appeal from the Civil …
njcourts.gov
… "rendered adequate assistance and made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2446-20 MELMARK, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent. _____________________________ …
njcourts.gov
… courts have 'a limited role' in the review of [CSC] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011) …
default
… found that defense counsel's investigation and strategic decisions were not deficient. The judge determined that …
default
… v. Bd. of Adjustment, Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 285 (1965)). Decisions on land use applications are entrusted to the …
default
… perform all her required duties or make investment decisions that generated reasonable income5 for the Trust. …
njcourts.gov
… characterized plaintiff as having "an unhurried concept of decisions which need to be made for [Brian]." In contrast, … as "scheduled and disciplined, recognizing that if decisions weren't made in accordance with deadlines, …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5138-13T3 IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH INVERSO, STATE PAROLE BOARD ___________________________ Argued December 20, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Leone. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3885-17T3 TRACY ESKRIDGE-JOSEPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________________ Submitted June 4, 2019 – Decided …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-2879-18T3 A-2880-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. A.A. and Z.S., Defendants-Appellants. IN THE MATTER OF S.A., H.A., L.A., …
default
… straightforward and set forth at length in the PCR judge's decisions that accompanied the orders under review. To … under review, we discern no reason to disturb the judge's decisions. See State v. Gideon, 244 N.J. 538, 551 (2021) … stated by Judge Carol Novey- Catuogno in her cogent written decisions. In doing so, we are satisfied defendant failed to …