default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2966-16T1 MICHAEL NOWICKI, … Argued July 16, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Whipple and Suter. On appeal from the Board of … 2C:35-10.5.1 The PNDA charged petitioner with conduct unbecoming a public employee and for the use, possession or sale …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4850-15T2 IN THE MATTER OF TELINA … Submitted August 30, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and Vernoia. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 7114-15. Weiner Law Group, LLP, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5622-15T1 WITHEY MILES, … Argued October 2, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Vernoia. On appeal from the Board of … Richard Rosa, testified defendant suffered from severe tricompartmental arthritis in his left knee prior to the 2007 …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0215-16T2 BRENDA PARKER, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and MATRIX PERSONNEL1 SOLUTIONS, INC., … for Matrix Personnel Solutions, Inc. ("Matrix"), a company which has not participated in this appeal. She …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1274-15T1 LORENZO CARTER, Appellant, … Submitted September 12, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Gilson and Mayer. On appeal from the New Jersey … (quoting Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 10, 99 S. Ct. 2100, 2105, 60 L. Ed. 2d …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5617-15T1 IN THE MATTER OF PETER … Argued December 5, 2018 – Decided January 24, 2019 Before Judges Reisner and Mawla. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2015-2246. Stuart J. Alterman argued …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5219-14T1 MONMOUTH COUNTY, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and AUDREY K. DUNWOODY, Respondents. … respondent Audrey Dunwoody was eligible for unemployment compensation benefits. After reviewing the record before us, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1011-15T2 IFE JAMES, Appellant, v. NEW … BOARD, Respondent. Submitted March 22, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Carroll and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the New … period pursuant to NERA. On September 16, 2014, James completed his custodial sentence and began serving his …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1032-15T3 KIMBERLYNN JURKOWSKI, … Argued January 19, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Lihotz and Hoffman. On appeal from the … appeals from the September 28, 2015 decision of the Commissioner of the Department of Education (Commissioner), …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4684-14T3 TIMOTHY CLARKE, … Submitted March 7, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Koblitz. On appeal from the Board of … Clarke to return to full firefighter duty, so long as he complied with various employment conditions including …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1420-15T1 GARY HOLMES, III, Appellant, … Submitted February 7, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Leone. On appeal from the Board of … was terminated for unauthorized removal or consumption of company property without payment. Specifically, Holmes was …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2722-16T2 AARON LYNN, Complainant-Appellant, v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S … Submitted January 24, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Currier and Geiger. On appeal from the New …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3071-15T31 A-3072-15T3 NATHAN … Argued November 8, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Moynihan. On appeal from Tax Court … he included a [fifteen percent] entrepreneurial profit when computing his costs-to-cure claiming that was the standard …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1086-15T4 JAMES KENNEDY, Appellant, v. … Submitted November 9, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Manahan and Suter. On appeal from the New Jersey … "a substantial likelihood exist[ed] that [Kennedy] would commit a new crime if 1 See N.J.A.C. 10A:71-3.21(d) …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1136-15T4 IN THE MATTER OF RAMONA … Argued December 13, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Nugent. On appeal from the Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2015-967. Mark W. Catanzaro argued …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0344-16T3 DAWN THOMAS, … Submitted November 14, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Mayer. On appeal from the Board of … she hurt her back on April 23, 2010 while checking on a combative patient. The Board denied Thomas' application …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2542-16T2 MIBAR, LLC, … Submitted January 24, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Nugent. On appeal from the Tax Court … LLC, challenges the 2013 property tax assessment of its commercial property in Elizabeth City ("plaintiff's …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3158-15T4 NEW JERSEY EDUCATION … Submitted June 26, 2017 – Decided July 13, 2017 Before Judges Fisher and Fasciale. On appeal from the … be liberally construed in order to enable the agency to accomplish its statutory responsibilities," and "courts should …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2336-15T2 BELINDA DODSON, … upon Dr. Berman's re-evaluation of Dodson, the Board revisited its original decision regarding disability … assigned duties." The ALJ considered Dodson's subjective complaints of pain in her lower back, especially when she …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0631-19 A-0823-19 A-1216-19 GARDEN … under long-settled law, appellants' right to bring their complaints to the attention of the Department, "does not … services" "in excess of any deductible, copayment, or coinsurance amount," N.J.S.A. 26:2SS-8(a)(1), and likewise …