-
#22-68
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… be excused in order to handle any motions which they may have scheduled. There is, of course, no objection to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0259-16T1 SCHIFFMAN, ABRAHAM, KAUFMAN & … Carroll. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-4311-13. Meredith … (Daniel S. Eichhorn, on the brief). PER CURIAM We have been advised prior to argument that this matter has …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1674-15T2 DANIELLE CARROLL, … Before Judges Espinosa and Guadagno. On appeal from the Division of Workers' Compensation, Claim Petition Nos. … the parties in the above matter that the issues in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal NOT FOR PUBLICATION …
-
njcourts.gov
SCOTT USHER AND KIMBERLY USHER, Plaintiff(s), vs. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, d/b/a STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS, et al., Defendants. FILED SEP 2 4 2021 RACHELLE L. HAR2 J.s.c. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISON: BERGEN COUNTY …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4096-23 RAYMOND MANZO, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. L-1170-24. Brandon J. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… --------------- SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO.: AM-000105-24T1 MOTION NO.: M-001023-24 … ORDER - REGULAR MOTION ES FILED, Clerk of the Appellate Division, November 14, 2024, AM-000105-24, M-001023-24 … …
-
njcourts.gov
… New Jersey/Defendant … Superior Court of New Jersey … Law Division – Criminal Part … State of New Jersey … - Select …
-
default › notices to the bar
… the Bar of New Jersey declares that the following attorneys have satisfied the requirement of R 1:28A:2(a) and their …
-
default › notices to the bar
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY It is ORDERED that the August 29, 2018 omnibus order designating those Municipal Court judges authorized to handle adult and minor involuntary commitment initial hearings, review hearings, and conversion hearings, with the …
-
default › notices to the bar
NOTICE ATTORNEYS REINSTATED FROM THE NEW JERSEY LAWYERS' FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION 2024 INELIGIBLE LIST The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection declares that the following New Jersey attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of the …
-
default › notices to the bar
… TO AVOID INELIGIBLE STATUS New Jersey attorneys who have not completed the online annual registration and …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1868-17T4 CONSTANTINE MATTHEWS and … sales of anything other than plants or animals that are or have been raised and/or grown on the premises. [Wayne … standard for summary judgment is whether the moving parties have established that there are no genuine disputes as to …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1241-17T1 JUSTICE R. ALLAH, Appellant, … are not moot because the Committee's determination may have an effect on future parole hearings, a position the … standards for admitting an inmate into the MCU; and did not have "any idea" about the process the MCURC used to reach a …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2967-18T2 J.M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. … stated that during his internal review, Dr. Baliga did not have access to the results of the two PT sessions in January … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. [Circus …
njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Rahsjahn Courtney (A-17-19) … The sentencing judge denied the request. The Appellate Division affirmed, rejecting defendant’s argument that the … were it not for the agreement, the extended term would have bumped up defendant’s exposure to twenty-to-life. …
njcourts.gov
… Associates IV, LLC v. Twp. of Teaneck and Director, Division of Taxation Docket No. 013983-2018 Dear Counsel: The … to the exempt parking facilities, the Township should have deducted the equalized assessed value of the … for prior equalized assessed value of the land should have been taken since the construction of the hotel …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2967-18T2 J.M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. … stated that during his internal review, Dr. Baliga did not have access to the results of the two PT sessions in January … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. [Circus …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1241-17T1 JUSTICE R. ALLAH, Appellant, … are not moot because the Committee's determination may have an effect on future parole hearings, a position the … standards for admitting an inmate into the MCU; and did not have "any idea" about the process the MCURC used to reach a …
-
njcourts.gov
… RE: FOSAMAX® LITIGATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY CASE NO. 282 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER … Bradley, Beatrice MID-L-008955-14 Weitz & Luxenberg Chavez, Josie MID-L-008043-14 Weitz & Luxenberg Chernick, … (*) are those in which motions to dismiss without prejudice have been filed, pursuant to the CMO dated December 13, 2022 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1868-17T4 CONSTANTINE MATTHEWS and … sales of anything other than plants or animals that are or have been raised and/or grown on the premises. [Wayne … standard for summary judgment is whether the moving parties have established that there are no genuine disputes as to …