
Filters
- A-1696-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1696-16T4 LIBERTY GREENS ASSOCIATION, … substantive arguments. First, the trial court should not have applied collateral estoppel to his challenges to the … in LGA I. We recognize that collateral estoppel would not have barred Bergeron from showing that he paid association …
- A-4994-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4994-16T1 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Burlington County, Docket No. 2011-1105. Mark J. … personally paid certain Estate expenses which should have been paid from the Vanguard accounts. The judge …
- A-0509-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0509-18T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Ocean County. Randolph H. Wolf argued the cause for … the expungement statute to sexual offenses only, it could have said so in the 2016 amendments because by then N.J.S.A. …
- A-5266-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5266-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Indictment No. 16-12-3331. Joseph E. … 4 A-5266-17T4 . . . . Please be advised that you have ten (10) days from receipt of this letter to appeal the …
- A-1826-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1826-17T3 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … to counsel." 9 A-1826-17T3 juncture that defendants could have argued that the amount due and owing on the note and …
- A-2493-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2493-17T1 IN THE MATTER OF THE … the cure period in N.J.A.C. 5:80-33.11(c)(1) . . . shall have one point per each defect cured deducted from the … meaning' of the rule by looking – as [Allenwood] would have [it] do – to other indicia to determine whether or not …
- A-1449-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1449-18T3 INTELLIAN CAPITAL ADVISORS, … herself as President of [plaintiff]" and did not have authority to file the mortgage discharge. On the … must dispose of all claims against all parties. "To have the finality required to create appellate jurisdiction, …
- A-0481-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0481-18T2 GEBROE-HAMMER ASSOCIATES, … (50%) of the [p]ercentages then held by all [m]embers shall have the right to act for and bind the [LLC] in the ordinary … Plaintiff's proffered evidence was not challenged. As we have previously stated: [W]here the broker has procured a …
- A-4011-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4011-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Thus, to overturn such a decision, the prior ruling must have been "so wide of the mark that a manifest denial of … On appeal, defense counsel argues that the judge should have instructed the jury not to consider the statements for …
- BER-L-1847-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… unknown), Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. BER-L-1847-18 TEACHERS … of the steel components. Teachers Village asserts that they have suffered damages and that McLaren is the type of … claims cannot survive once the underlying claims have been dismissed. III. The Lack of a Ferreira Conference …
- F-015036-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. F-015036-18 OPINION … [sic] office. Case number is xxxxxxx. All the documents have been submitted and the woman’s name is Vanessa Jones at … considered “facially complete” when all missing documents have been submitted. Id. at §1024.41(c)(2)(iv). If the …
- 006497-2020 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Div. 2000).7 In sum, the court finds that plaintiffs, who have the burden of proof, have not proven that the County Board’s judgment, which is …
- A-2555-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … N.J.S.A. 2C:24-8(a) imposes criminal liability on those who have "assumed continuing responsibility for the care of a … abandonment, desertion, or a failure to act, we would have to twist the Legislature's words beyond their plain …
- A-2289-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2289-20 F.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … arguments and affirm. I. The parties were never married but have one child, S.B., who was born February 9, 2018. Shortly … order or proceeding was entered or taken." R. 4:50-2. We have explained that a reasonable time is determined based …
- A-1153-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1153-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 99 N.J. 123 (1985). Since the judge found the court did not have jurisdiction to consider the motion, such an analysis … does not qualify for a judicial furlough as she does not have an extremely rare medical condition that requires …
- A-1733-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1733-20 A.L., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in the record. The parties were married in 2005 and have two daughters who were nine- and twelve-years old when … and that on another occasion she "very well may have" told plaintiff to "drop dead." She accused plaintiff …
- A-4208-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4208-18 T.O. Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … court to grant [T.O.] residential custody, the court [would have] no confidence that plaintiff would not seek to . . . … (App. Div. 1978). What is in the child's best interest may have the effect of limiting parental rights. See Sacharow v. …
- A-3446-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3446-19 BLITEI, LLC, … 2017. She certified she never received notice, nor did she have any knowledge of, any pending foreclosure action … consistent with plaintiff's explanation that the server may have misheard or mis-transcribed the name of the person he …
- A-0888-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0888-19 NELSON VILLANUEVA, Appellant, v. … any timely request for a polygraph examination would have been denied. We next consider Villanueva's argument, … arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. To the extent we have not addressed any of Villanueva's remaining arguments, …
- A-4461-14T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4461-14T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Gibbs pled guilty to second- degree certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7 (count eleven). In exchange, … has the opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the feel of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …