njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. A.T.C. (A-28-18) (081201) … a victim less than thirteen years of age. The Appellate Division rejected defendant’s separation of powers challenge … moved to modify his sentence, arguing that he should have been sentenced to fifteen years of incarceration rather …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3207-18 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … himself" during his statement and, as such, "he did not have a motive to fabricate" (factor eleven). 14 A-3207-18 … by the trial court "unless it is of such a nature as to have been clearly capable of producing an unjust result." R. …
-
njcourts.gov › edit week 2 appellate calendar
… Password Log in Enter your User 10 and PasS\vord. If you have been provided with a temporary password, login below. … accessing our systems., Click here for P-Synch. Should you have any questions, please contact the Superior Court … problems with accessing our systems.Cl ick here. Should you have a ny questions. please contact the Superior Court …
-
njcourts.gov › edit week 2 appellate calendar
… 10 million or more persons; 2. It is spoken by persons who have needed interpreters in New Jersey's courts; 3. It needs … Arabic; 4. One or more interpreters who speak the language have registered with the New Jersey Administrative Office of … is known. However, speakers within a language community may have different opinions about which name they prefer.” It …
-
#15-05
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… Administrators Civil, Criminal, Family, and Municipal Division Managers FROM: Philip S. Carchman, J.A.D. SUBJECT: … them. As stated in the Guidelines, “These procedures have been established to further the Judiciary’s open … the record(s) being requested. Separate request forms have been developed for the Civil (including Special Civil …
-
njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. A.T.C. (A-28-18) (081201) … a victim less than thirteen years of age. The Appellate Division rejected defendant’s separation of powers challenge … moved to modify his sentence, arguing that he should have been sentenced to fifteen years of incarceration rather …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5846-17 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … 404(b) led the jury to a result it otherwise might not have reached, we vacate defendant's conviction and sentence, … "looked like he was brown. Like dark brown. And he didn't have hair." She was not asked if the driver of the car was …
-
njcourts.gov
… Coordinator, also known as the TAC Officer. Should you have any questions, you may also contact the Judiciary … The Complaint may be submitted to the court when updates have not been applied. • Preview will display the case … feature will assist in finding a LiveScan record that may have been generated with an incorrect municipality code. 7) …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1587-21 JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES … party ever had, now has or hereinafter can, shall, or may have, for, upon or by reason of any matter, cause or thing … that it include[d] rights or claims that were or could have been raised at the time of the 1984 [s]ettlement …
-
A-1068-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY : APPELLATE DIVISION : DOCKET NO. A-001068-23T4 : Civil Action : ON APPEAL … which it was bound. (Dal 14). This anom alous result m ay have been caused by am biguous language w ithin the opinion … the only remaining manner by which the trial court could have conceivably deemed the Township's custodian to have …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … $475,000 and $535,000;3 and COVID-19 "may or may not have" impacted the collection of rents. The judge … to the end that marketable titles" are secured, but we have recognized that "'does not negate the specific textual …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3353-17T2 PREFERRED HOME HEALTHCARE AND … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. C-000160-16. Callagy … of consideration, and the product of a material mistake. We have examined the record and applicable legal principles, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1093-16T1 JUAN D. CAPELLAN-URENA, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L- 4943-14. Patrick M. … F. Kawalec, III, on the brief). PER CURIAM Claiming to have sustained personal injuries in a motor vehicle …
njcourts.gov
… 2015 On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Alicia J. Hubbard, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, … should not disturb those findings merely because “it might have reached a different conclusion were it the trial … 94 N.J. 210, 236 (1983). The judgment of the Appellate Division is accordingly reversed, and defendant’s conviction …
-
njcourts.gov › edit week 2 appellate calendar
… the List of Documents page. Adobe Reader Most of the users have the free Adobe Reader on their machines and they need …
-
njcourts.gov
IN THE MATTER OF JOHN F. RUSSO, JR., SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY M-179 September Term 2019 082636 FILED SEP 2 0 2019 c~~~ ORDER A JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY Under the Constitution, the Chief Justice heads the Supreme Court and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION JOSEPH TELLADO … electronic medium (E-Mail) shall be deemed by the court to have received a copy of the filed original court document. …
-
njcourts.gov
… & Dohme Corp. Defendant. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY FOSAMAX LITIGATION DOCKET NO. …
-
njcourts.gov
… & Dohme Corp. Defendant. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY FOSAMAX LITIGA T!ON DOCKET NO. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SEP ? o 2016 Lisa Bean SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY Plaintiff FOSAMAX LITIGATION vs. …