Filters
- A-1313-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1313-20 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, … defendant contends the foreclosure judge should have allowed further discovery based on newly discovered … 457 N.J. Super. 237, 240-41, 247-48 (App. Div. 2018). We have held possession of the note or an assignment of the …
- A-5726-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … In this appeal, defendant argues the Law Division should have vacated his conviction and remanded the matter for a … DECLINED TO REMAND THE MATTER FOR A NEW TRIAL AS IT SHOULD HAVE. We reject this argument, affirm the Law Division's …
- A-2760-14T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2760-14T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … is not determinative . . . [a]nd the other three factors have to be considered." Next, the judge considered the … while it may not be the most accessible library, he does have some accessibility to the library at the jail. And he …
- A-2236-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2236-18T3 ANGELINA DEL CARMEN, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-1929-17. Law Office of … plaintiff's . . . speculat[ion] that [defendants] must have given [Buettel] permission . . . simply because …
- A-4522-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4522-16T2 RELEASEE 1 and RELEASEE 2,1 … The next day, G.R. emailed A.D. and told him, "I think we have a settlement" for the sum they had discussed. G.R. told … never informed her that a confidentiality agreement would have to be part of any final settlement. B.G. testified that …
- A-72-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. William A. Gerena (A-72-20) … case. The Court affirms the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge … concerning estimation of a child’s age. Trial judges have the “discretion to provide appropriate charges, on …
- 003355-2017 Opinionnjcourts.gov… incredible. If plaintiff was such a layperson, it would have easily understood the “check the box” instruction, and presumably how to put a check in the box, and would have simply obeyed the instructions to check the box, sign …
- A-3567-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3567-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Defendant agreed to waive his right to appeal and have no contact with the victim. The State recommended a … report indicated defendant "rejected any notion that he may have committed the present offense and can no longer recall …
- A-2562-21 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2562-21 JOHN HUGHES, … as I see the others filled out the same. Also[,] they only have a single name on top of the signature pages. Could you … "Our intent was at the time of signature and remains now to have signed for all three candidates running as a group …
- A-0578-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0578-18T2 TERCO ENTERPRISES, LLC, … not [be] upset 8 A-0578-18T2 . . . unless [it] is shown to have been 'arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, or [] not … would be advantaged over others, like Jer-Car, who may have only filed a non-compliant bid on one line item, for …
- A-3240-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3240-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … and his sentence was illegal were meritless. 2 We have not been provided with these petitions. 3 We were not … filed for PCR, arguing that the sentencing court did not have jurisdiction to amend the JOC and by doing so, violated …
- A-0030-19T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0030-19T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … (count seventy-seven); second-degree certain persons not to have a handgun, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(b) (counts seventy-eight, … and eighty-one); and fourth-degree certain persons not to have a weapon, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(a) (counts eighty-two, …
- A-3642-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3642-17T3 NIEL AKSHAR, INC., … concerned because it was after 2:00 a.m., the store should have been closed and the store had been the scene of a … from the totality of the record and on that record findings have been made and conclusions reached involving agency …
- A-3580-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3580-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … THE UNEXHAUSTED ISSUES PRESENTED TO THE LOWER COURT HAD/HAVE MERIT AND THE DENIAL VIOLATED PETITIONER'S STATE AND … IS NOT SUBJECT TO BAR VIA R. 3:22-4(A) BECAUSE IT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN RAISED AT ANY PRIOR PROCEEDING AND IS BEING RAISED …
- A-2917-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2917-15T3 J.L.M., Plaintiff-Respondent, … plaintiff indicating when it is available. Defendant will have no other contact with plaintiff." The family court … get "smart" or "creative" and stated defendant was "not to have any contact with [plaintiff] other than when the …
- A-3134-14T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3134-14T4 RONALD ATLAK, … is gleaned from the parties' briefs because no transcripts have been provided regarding the appearance. 4 A-3134-14T4 … of the current motion" by raising issues she could have raised earlier, effectively making an untimely motion …
- A-3405-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3405-15T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE … to the "one-to-one." Without the "one-to-one," she may have acted on her desire to cut herself. The psychiatrist … "thought process" was "not disorganized." She did not have "auditory or visual hallucination[s]." Although she had …
- A-5497-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5497-15T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Manahan. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Indictment No. 15-01-0013. Joseph E. … must also consider the extent to which the police have corroborated the information in the tip through their …
- A-5400-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5400-15T1 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … to restore the estate's assets to what they would have 6 A-5400-15T1 been had the undue influence not … reiterate the arguments made before Judge Dow. We have considered these arguments in light of the 10 …
- A-0115-14T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0115-14T3 THE FOUR FELDS, INC., d/b/a L. … statute. R. 1:4-8. Because the motion court did not have jurisdiction, Rule 2:9-1, and the orders do not change … Plaintiffs primarily argue that the motion court should not have dismissed this matter on the pleadings because the …