-
Coss – CMO II (Levy)
Orders and Decisions
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ROGER & SUSAN … electronic medium (E-Mail) shall be deemed by the court to have received a copy of the filed original court document. … To the extent that plaintiff and defendant generic experts have been deposed before, the parties seeking that …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0274-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … barred pursuant to Rule 3:22-4 because he could have raised the claims related to the voluntary nature of … that the contact was consensual. Thus, [defendant] would have implicated himself and admitted his sexual contact with …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5535-17T4 EDWARD F. CASTELLANO, … or educational purposes; and (3) was 3 The parties have not distinguished between or among St. Joseph's Church, … Church for the use of Jeremiah House would appear to have no relevance in the immunity analysis. See Green v. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0727-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Sumners. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Morris County, Indictment No. 16-02-0148. Joseph E. … 601, 607-08 (2010). All other arguments, to the extent we have not already addressed them, lack sufficient merit to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4946-16T3 DAVID SPENCER, Appellant, v. … because: the reports relied upon by the DHO "may have been false or altered"; it was "not right [or] legal" … and the physical evidence appellant was alleged to have possessed – a cell phone and $300 – was not immediately …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3746-16T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … TO HIM DURING HIS DETENTION UP UNTIL [H]IS SENTENCING. We have considered defendant's arguments in light of the … second, 6 A-3746-16T1 and fifth points fail because we have previously considered and rejected defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0243-17T3 JOHNNIE DAVENPORT, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … of Corr., 386 N.J. Super. 631, 640 (App. Div. 2006). We have held that in considering a self-defense claim, the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2052-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Rose. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment Nos. 14-09-2201 and … POINT I THE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BECAUSE THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT . . . …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5708-14T2 WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL … desires to reconsider. Nevertheless, for completeness, we have considered the merits, which we find unavailing. We have reviewed defendant's motions asserting final judgment …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4914-15T1 SARA BACON, … OF THE EXTENDED SERVICE CONTRACT. 2 For convenience, we have omitted the subparts to Point I. 4 A-4914-15T1 III. THE … cost of the warranty but the cost of the repairs that would have been covered had the warranty not been wrongfully …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0095-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … – excessive corporal punishment and a failure to seek 2 We have renumbered these arguments. 5 A-0095-16T4 medical … The judge answered that question in the affirmative, and we have been presented with no principled reason to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3557-15T1 NORTH ORATON URBAN RENEWAL, … at the rate set forth in N.J.S.A. 54:4-67(c), and should have applied the post-judgment rate provided in Rule … rate of interest, . . . the property owners should have fully expected to be liable for interest at the …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3912-16T4 IN THE MATTER OF THE SEIZURE … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County, Docket No. … The State argues in the alternative that the judge could have also found J.D.M. disqualified by application of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4309-15T3 DUMONT BOARD OF EDUCATION, … the Borough agreed to use the Property, which included a schoolhouse, for a borough hall and other allied "municipal … in question, then before the Mayor and Council . . . shall have the legal right either to sell or to transfer and …
-
njcourts.gov
… HERNIA MESH LITIGATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY MASTER CASE NO. ATL-L-3857-21 CASE … Pg 2 of 5 Trans ID: LCV2022608616 b. Other than provision of Plaintiff Profile Forms (to be set out in a future … not be filed in any given case until the order of trials have been established and Ordered by the Court in accordance …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, LAW DIVISION, MIDDLESEX COUNTY …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, LAW DIVISION, MIDDLESEX COUNTY …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0033-23 DONALD MUENZER, … intentions. The judge further stated that each party would have ten days to decide if they wanted to match or outbid … the party who presented the highest bid. Each party would have an opportunity to match and outbid the other. "[T]he …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2824-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … of that refusal . Instead, he contends he "would have made more arguments as to why the [S]tate did not meet … On that record, we perceive no prejudice. To the extent we have not commented on any arguments raised by defendant that …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1750-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … THE WINDOWS MAGNIFIER APPLICATION, THE TRIAL COURT SHOULD HAVE PRECLUDED THE STATE FROM USING THE APPLICATION. A. The … the Windows Magnifier application, the trial court should have barred the State from using the application at trial as …