-
njcourts.gov
… RONALD W. BIRD, individually, Third-Party Defendants, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … R. 1:36-3. 2 A-1021-22 and NATIONAL LOAN ACQUISITIONS COMPANY, Defendant/Intervenor- Respondent. … law and the legal consequences that flow from established facts are not entitled to any special deference." Manalapan …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 11, 2024 – Decided March 18, 2025 Before Judges Currier and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from … a reopening of the FJOD. We affirm. Plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce in 2008. After extensive discovery, … 779 F.2d 1260, 1265 (7th Cir. 1985)). A trial court's factual findings "are binding on appeal when supported by …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued April 30, 2024 – Decided May 30, 2024 Before Judges Mayer, Paganelli and Augostini. On appeal from … agreement (MSA) requiring them to confer, consult and communicate on all issues involving their child. We glean … which ha[d] made the prospect of coparenting and working together in accordance with . . . the terms of Article II of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 14, 2024 – Decided May 21, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Haas. On appeal from the … 1 "An 'open plea' [is] one that d[oes] not include a recommendation from the State, nor a prior indication from the … burden, the defendant must allege and articulate specific facts that "provide the court with an adequate basis on …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 28, 2024 – Decided June 14, 2024 Before Judges Sabatino and Marczyk. On appeal from the Board … in the record; and (3) whether, in applying the law to the facts, the administrative agency clearly erred in reaching … not entitled to those benefits, the New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Law requires repayment of the unemployment …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 24, 2025 – Decided April 10, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino and Jacobs. On appeal from the Superior … in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-2361-23 In this commercial loan foreclosure case, defendants appeal the … we affirm. I. We presume the parties' familiarity with the factual and procedural background of this case and need not …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 22, 2023 – Decided June 5, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the … denied her request that the trial court take measures to compel defendant to comply with the provisions of the … proceedings consistent with this opinion. The salient facts are not in dispute. The parties were married in 2013 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 14, 2023 – Decided April 25, 2023 Before Judges Messano and Gilson. On appeal from the Superior … judgment in favor of defendant and dismissed plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff argues that the chancery court erred in … of Michael's Will. Jermaine and Michelle had a son together, and Derek was Jermaine's brother. Michelle also …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 8, 2023 – Decided March 17, 2023 Before Judges Vernoia and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … to properly consider and weigh the applicable statutory factors in modifying his alimony obligations; erred by considering income defendant earned from the retirement account he …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 28, 2023 – Decided April 11, 2023 Before Judges Geiger and Berdote Byrne. On appeal from the … sentences. We afford deference to the PCR court's factual findings, but our interpretation of the law is de … explain the reasons for imposing consecutive sentences, the commission of such an error is not a cognizable ground for …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 21, 2023 – Decided May 16, 2023 Before Judges Sumners and Susswein. On appeal from the New … violated N.J.A.C. 10A:4-4.1(a)(4)(viii) (.709), failure to comply with a written rule or regulation of the correctional … 556 (App. Div. 2007). 4 A-1059-21 no misinterpretation of facts." Gramp noted, "[t]hroughout the pandemic, the wearing …
-
njcourts.gov
… Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. ____________________________ … Submitted January 17, 2023 — Decided January 24, 2023 Before Judges Mawla and Marczyk. On appeal from the Superior … answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits," show no genuine issue of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 6, 2023 – Decided March 1, 2023 Before Judges Whipple, Mawla, and Marczyk. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … Cesare, 154 N.J. 394, 411-13 (1998), and are bound by her factual findings so long as they are supported by … time the Division ruled her out based on her failure to complete probation for a 2016 weapons conviction, the fact …
-
njcourts.gov
… 10003 TEL. 212-55$-5500 FAX 212-34-t,5461 WWW.\\'KlTlLLlX,COM ELLEN RELKL'l, Esq. Direct Nmnh …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 6, 2023 – Decided March 5, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … arbitrator verbally informed counsel of the decision and completed a "Report and Award of Arbitrator(s)" form (the … file with the division manager a trial de novo request together with a $200 fee within thirty (30) days of today. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 19, 2024 – Decided March 26, 2024 Before Judges Haas and Puglisi. On appeal from the Superior … order granting summary judgment to defendant The Travelers Companies d/b/a Travelers ("Travelers") and dismissing his … Cranmer2 seeking to recover the full amount of the check, together with certain fees he allegedly incurred in the course …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 5, 2025 – Decided December 31, 2025 Before Judges Sumners and Susswein. On appeal from the … not review the State's evidence with him until the trial commenced. He claimed appellate counsel failed to argue … contention that the judge did not make findings of fact or conclusions of law regarding some of his contentions …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 6, 2025 – Decided January 6, 2026 Before Judges Mayer and Gummer. On appeal from the New Jersey … Li contends the record lacked substantial evidence she had committed the prohibited act and that the DOC erroneously … and 3) whether, 5 A-2512-24 in applying the law to the facts, the agency reached a decision that could be viewed as …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 10, 2025 – Decided January 6, 2026 Before Judges Mayer and Gummer. On appeal from the New Jersey … Li contends the record lacked substantial evidence she had committed the prohibited act and that the DOC erroneously … in the record; and 3) whether, in applying the law to the facts, the agency reached a decision that could be viewed as …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 9, 2025 – Decided December 17, 2025 Before Judges Rose and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from … trial judge issued a thorough oral decision, detailing his factual findings and legal conclusions. Citing the … 20, 2025 order. In his written statement of reasons accompanying the order, the judge noted defendant opposed the …