-
njcourts.gov
… of Education of Toms River Regional School District. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Rothstadt and Sumners. 3 A-2768-12T3 On appeal from the Commissioner of Education, Agency Docket No. 348-11/09. … Seaside Park from the Central Regional school district. The fact that a handful of parents in a tiny school district …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued April 5, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Manahan and Lisa. On appeal from Superior Court … defendants' submissions, the Board deemed the applications complete and held public hearings on July 10, 2014, for … The courts "will give substantial deference to findings of fact, [however,] it is essential that the board's actions be …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 28, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Ostrer. On appeal from the Superior … manner in which the alleged failure to file a direct appeal comes before us, we must vacate the order under review and … 405 N.J. Super. 149 (App Div. 2009) reprinted from an unofficial reporter; four more handwritten pages of no …
-
njcourts.gov
… SEAMON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ … Submitted November 8, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Gilson. On appeal from Superior … new complaint to pursue her bad faith claim. The underlying facts are straightforward and uncontested. In 2012, …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … provision, N.J.S.A. 2C:44-3(a). The court found aggravating factors three, the risk defendant would reoffend; six, the … the crime involved domestic violence and defendant had "committed at least one act of domestic violence on more than …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. PLYMOUTH ROCK ASSURANCE, d/b/a PLYMOUTH ROCK MANAGEMENT COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, d/b/a HIGH POINT PREFERRED INSURANCE … Submitted October 6, 2021 – Decided November 5, 2021 Before Judges Whipple and Susswein. On appeal from the … The motion shall be supported by an affidavit reciting the facts of the delinquent party's default and stating that the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 7, 2020 – Decided February 10, 2021 Before Judges Fasciale and Rothstadt. On appeal from the … on the brief). PER CURIAM Plaintiff Allyson Wallace filed a complaint against defendant Starkist for damages arising … 2018, plaintiff for the first time produced a complaint together with a CIS bearing a "filed" stamp dated September …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 11, 2021 – Decided Before Judges Gooden Brown and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … murder and related offenses. We affirm. I. The following facts are derived from the record. In 1999, defendant was … that admission of this evidence would have changed the outcome of his trial because if presented with this evidence …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 17, 2020 – Decided February 3, 2021 Before Judges Gilson and Moynihan. On appeal from the Superior … CHARGES, AND 2. HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND NOR PROVIDE A FULL FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE CHARGES. POINT II DEFENDANT'S GUILTY … the law. His argument that the plea court failed to comply with Rule 3:9-2 requires an analysis discrete from …
-
njcourts.gov
… Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY,1 Defendant-Respondent, and JENNIFER KOLASINSKI, … Submitted January 6, 2021 – Decided Before Judges Whipple, Rose, and Firko. 1 Improperly pled as … September 27, 2019 order.3 Acknowledging the essential facts are undisputed, plaintiff raises a single legal issue …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 25, 2020 – Decided April 16, 2021 Before Judges Fuentes and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … to dismiss the remaining counts in the indictment and recommend the court sentence defendant to a term of three … waiving his rights to stand trial and to ensure there was a factual basis to support his admission of guilt. On March …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 16, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … for the reasons set forth below. We discern the following facts from the record. Between July 2016 and January 2017, plaintiff resided in a community residence for mentally ill adults that was …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 17, 2021 – Decided June 7, 2021 Before Judges Sabatino and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … that follow, we dismiss in part and affirm in part. I. The facts may be summarized as follows. The parties are three … which is outside of the estate. Robert and Basem made competing applications to be appointed Administrator of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 17, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Whipple and Mawla. On appeal from the Board of … However, after reviewing her assertions and relying on the fact that the children's mother never lived with Moore on a … that an individual is not eligible for unemployment compensation unless the individual "is able to work, and is …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 17, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Enright. On appeal from the Board of … we overturn an agency decision merely because we would have come to a 3 A-5313-17T3 different conclusion. In re … of a public employee's pension is governed by the factors enumerated by our Supreme Court in Uricoli v. Police …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 3, 2019 – Decided October 16, 2019 Before Judges Fuentes, Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the … on the record. Subsequently, plaintiff filed a Verified Complaint and Order to Show Cause in the Law Division, … The record makes clear the arbitrator considered many factors when fixing an award for pain and suffering, even if …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 29, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Suter and Geiger. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket Nos. 2015-3158, 2016-3249 and 2016-3197. … not appropriate for the infractions, was contrary to the facts found by the ALJ and did not accord with the law of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 14, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Suter and Firko. On appeal from Superior Court … denying his motion to vacate default and reinstate his complaint. Having reviewed plaintiff's arguments in light of … is not an attorney-at-law. 5 A-2022-17T2 After considering factual and expert testimony in the absence of plaintiff at …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 1, 2018 – Decided October 11, 2018 Before Judges Sabatino and Mitterhoff. On appeal from Superior … right to counsel fees in these circumstances as a component of the overdue "rent" was clearly expressed in the … we reverse the trial court's denial of fees. The facts pertinent to this appeal are relatively …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 24, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Rothstadt. On appeal from Superior … 2018 2 A-4325-16T2 defendant William J. Devorak, Jr. to accommodate defendant's parenting time with their now … not submitted a Certification of Services addressing the factors" for consideration of a counsel fee award as …