njcourts.gov
… 164 N.J. 1, 7 (2000). The defense is not raised if the manufacturer challenges only the practicality of an alternative … so, the plaintiff must prove that the product did not conform to whatever may have been the feasible technology. … person using the product with the ordinary knowledge common to that class of consumer. … Jury Interrogatories on …
-
2.25
Charges Document PDF
njcourts.gov
… Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”) and the standard for employer liability for supervisory harassment, and the … upon the identity of the harasser as indicated in bracketed comments to the court in that section. CHARGE 2.25 - Page 2 … considered individually may be sufficient when considered together. (3) The severity of conduct can be exacerbated when …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 25, 2021 – Decided April 20, 2021 Before Judges Whipple, Rose, and Firko. On appeal from the … February 28, 2020 judgment following a bench trial in this commercial landlord-tenant dispute. We affirm in part, and … 463, 471 (1999)). Thus, when we "conclude[] there is satisfactory evidentiary support for the trial court's findings, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 9, 2017 – Decided June 29, 2017 Before Judges Hoffman, O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from … to await the other police units. Shortly thereafter, Bridgeton police took defendant into custody and brought him … State Police "were attempting to locate somebody that had committed a robbery." The report described the suspect as "a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 6, 2024 – Decided October 9, 2024 Before Judges Accurso and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior … Mancuso's motion to stay the Law Division proceedings and compel arbitration of plaintiff's causes of action under the … 219 N.J. at 441 (citing Hirsch, 215 N.J. at 187). Thus, the fact that the MAAC's provisions otherwise satisfy the …
-
A-44-52-23 Petition For Review New Jersey Association For Justice
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… COURT OF NEW JERSEY DOCKET NO.: 089278 IN RE: ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION 745 FILED APR 112024 ~d~ BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF NJAJ'S PETITION FOR REVIEW OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS … While the referral fee is paid from the legal fee, this fact does not establish that the attorney receiving the …
-
A-27-24 Petition For Certification
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… R UANE, individually, Defendants-Respondents. ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION FROM AN ORDER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT … New York 11530 (516) 248-5550 apc@employmentlawyernewyork.com Attorneys for Plaintiff-Petitioner i TABLE OF CONTENTS … Marmic LLC (“Marmic”) and Mike Ruane, individually (together as “Respondents”), due to the trial court’s: (i) …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 26, 2025 – Decided April 24, 2025 Before Judges Rose and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the Superior … J. Coppi1 appeals from a May 2, 2024 Law Division order compelling arbitration and staying further litigation … plenary hearing is required to determine whether there is a factual dispute regarding UATP's rights under the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 22, 2025 – Decided February 4, 2026 Before Judges Currier, Smith and Jablonski. NOT FOR … and ordered Charles to resolve an open warrant and complete parenting training. The court also continued … our judgment for that of the Family Part provided its factual findings are "grounded in substantial and credible …
njcourts.gov
… ## NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … (1) inappropriately gave heavy weight to the aggravating factor of deterrence, and (2) failed to discuss the overall … and mitigating factors found were not 'based upon competent credible evidence in the record;' or (3) 'the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 27, 2026 – Decided March 11, 2026 Before Judges Rose and Torregrossa-O'Connor. On appeal from … Hakeem Maloney appeals from a June 7, 2024 order, accompanied by a cogent written decision, denying his petition … HIM AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. Unpersuaded, we affirm. I. The facts and events are detailed in our prior unpublished …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 17, 2025 – Decided January 12, 2026 Before Judges Natali and Bergman. On appeal from the Superior … principles, we affirm. I. We recite the following pertinent facts and procedural history relevant to this appeal. On … three, N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1(a)(3) (risk that defendant will commit another offense); and nine, N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1(a)(9) …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3907-23 PC CLARK PROPERTY LLC and COMPLETE CARE AT CLARK LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … Submitted October 22, 2025 – Decided January 13, 2026 Before Judges Mayer, Vanek and Jacobs. On appeal from the … II. We apply a deferential standard in reviewing a judge's factual findings. Balducci v. Cige, 240 N.J. 574, 595 …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 14, 2026 – Decided January 23, 2026 Before Judges Currier, Smith and Jablonski. On appeal from the … time-barred under Rule 3:22-12(a)(1). I. A. We recount the facts from defendant's direct appeal after his second trial: … listen to me for a moment because I’m going to explain this completely to you. In other words[,] you could not say that …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 9, 2025 – Decided December 18, 2025 Before Judges Sumners and Chase. On appeal from the Superior … consider moving to that would be suitable for her work commute and would not greatly affect 3 A-2467-23 plaintiff's … our review. II. Ordinarily, we defer to the Family Court's factual findings, as long as they are supported by …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 18, 2022 – Decided December 8, 2022 Before Judges Sumners and Susswein. On appeal from the … to -35. She also appeals from the dismissal of her cross-complaint seeking an FRO against plaintiff. The parties' domestic violence cross-complaints were tried together. Neither party was represented by counsel. Judge …
njcourts.gov
… the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … had been the subject of a domestic-violence complaint, which was dismissed. The Division substantiated … consideration of all relevant statutory and regulatory factors to determine the suitability of the placement. N.J. …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … FRUMER, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. NATIONAL HOME INSURANCE COMPANY1 and HOME BUYERS WARRANTY CORPORATION, … law and the legal consequences that flow from established facts are not entitled to any special deference.'" Id. at …
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 1, 2022 – Decided December 30, 2022 Before Judges Gilson and Rose. On appeal from the Board of … appellant had not met his burden of presenting sufficient competent and credible evidence to establish that his injury … effort alone is not a traumatic event. 192 N.J. at 213. Together, these cases explain that an injury caused by work …
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 6, 2022 - Decided January 9, 2023 Before Judges Gummer and Paganelli. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket Nos. 2019-3637 and 2021-1809. Catherine … reconsideration nearly two-years after the deadline. On the facts presented here, Haidara's two-year delay in filing for …