Filters
- A-3313-23 Briefs Briefsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION Docket No. A-003313-23 Civil Action On Appeal from an … to the settlement agreement. Appellants, on the other hand, have always maintained that Mr. Nadeem is, and always has … dismissing the claim, Judge Vena concluded “Riaz and Khan have already acknowledged and admitted in the [ ] Settlement …
- UNN-L-4147-20- Summary Judgment Opinionnjcourts.gov… et al., Defendant(s). SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION UNION COUNTY DOCKET NO. UNN-L-4147-20 ORDER THIS … the League Entities defaulted on their loans and Plaintiffs have no recourse to foreclose on the mortgages. Plaintiffs … Payan claimed in their interrogatory responses that they have no knowledge regarding any of the transactions or …
- A-2905-23 Briefs Briefsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2905-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … charging Pearson with second-degree certain persons not to have weapons, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7b(1). (Da 8) … that a person is seized when “a reasonable person would have believed that he [or she] was not free to leave”). (1T …
- A-3561-23 Briefs Briefsnjcourts.gov… Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division ❖ ❖ ❖ Docket No. A-003561-23 TAHISHA ROACH AND EMELIA … the Honorable Jack M. Sabatino, P.J.A.D. wrote: Defendants have not demonstrated why it is in the interests of justice … While the Motion to Enforce 3 To date, the class members have not been notified of the June 12, 2024 decertification …
- A-3561-23 Briefs Briefsnjcourts.gov… Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division ❖ ❖ ❖ Docket No. A-003561-23 TAHISHA ROACH AND EMELIA … the Honorable Jack M. Sabatino, P.J.A.D. wrote: Defendants have not demonstrated why it is in the interests of justice … While the Motion to Enforce 3 To date, the class members have not been notified of the June 12, 2024 decertification …
- A-0595-23 Briefs Briefsnjcourts.gov… TOBACCO COMPANY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, Defendant/Respondent. SUPERIOR COURT OF … Pa559. The Tax Court’s statement that Lorillard could have requested other than the 1 Though Defendant’s audit of … Ibid. The Tax Court's statement that Lorillard could have requested other than the Schedule G-2 limited amounts …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1868-17T4 CONSTANTINE MATTHEWS and … sales of anything other than plants or animals that are or have been raised and/or grown on the premises. [Wayne … standard for summary judgment is whether the moving parties have established that there are no genuine disputes as to …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1241-17T1 JUSTICE R. ALLAH, Appellant, … are not moot because the Committee's determination may have an effect on future parole hearings, a position the … standards for admitting an inmate into the MCU; and did not have "any idea" about the process the MCURC used to reach a …
- J.M. VS. HORIZON N.J. HEALTH (DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2967-18T2 J.M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. … stated that during his internal review, Dr. Baliga did not have access to the results of the two PT sessions in January … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. [Circus …
- njcourts.gov… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Rahsjahn Courtney (A-17-19) … The sentencing judge denied the request. The Appellate Division affirmed, rejecting defendant’s argument that the … were it not for the agreement, the extended term would have bumped up defendant’s exposure to twenty-to-life. …
- Glenpointe Associates IV, LLC v. Twp. of Teaneck and Director, Division of Taxation - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… Associates IV, LLC v. Twp. of Teaneck and Director, Division of Taxation Docket No. 013983-2018 Dear Counsel: The … to the exempt parking facilities, the Township should have deducted the equalized assessed value of the … for prior equalized assessed value of the land should have been taken since the construction of the hotel …
- A-2967-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2967-18T2 J.M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. … stated that during his internal review, Dr. Baliga did not have access to the results of the two PT sessions in January … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. [Circus …
- 013983-2018 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Associates IV, LLC v. Twp. of Teaneck and Director, Division of Taxation Docket No. 013983-2018 Dear Counsel: The … to the exempt parking facilities, the Township should have deducted the equalized assessed value of the … for prior equalized assessed value of the land should have been taken since the construction of the hotel …
- A-1868-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1868-17T4 CONSTANTINE MATTHEWS and … sales of anything other than plants or animals that are or have been raised and/or grown on the premises. [Wayne … standard for summary judgment is whether the moving parties have established that there are no genuine disputes as to …
- A-17-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Rahsjahn Courtney (A-17-19) … The sentencing judge denied the request. The Appellate Division affirmed, rejecting defendant’s argument that the … were it not for the agreement, the extended term would have bumped up defendant’s exposure to twenty-to-life. …
- A-1241-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1241-17T1 JUSTICE R. ALLAH, Appellant, … are not moot because the Committee's determination may have an effect on future parole hearings, a position the … standards for admitting an inmate into the MCU; and did not have "any idea" about the process the MCURC used to reach a …
- Case Management Order January 24, 2023 Case Management Conference Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… RE: FOSAMAX® LITIGATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY CASE NO. 282 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER … Bradley, Beatrice MID-L-008955-14 Weitz & Luxenberg Chavez, Josie MID-L-008043-14 Weitz & Luxenberg Chernick, … (*) are those in which motions to dismiss without prejudice have been filed, pursuant to the CMO dated December 13, 2022 …
- Order – In-House Attorney Ineligibility for CLE Noncompliance (2025) Notice to the Barnjcourts.gov › notices to the bar… the names of the New Jersey In-House Counsel (IHC) who have failed to comply with the mandatory continuing legal … the compliance-reporting years from 2011 through 2025, or have failed to demonstrate that they are entitled to an …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1442-22 MELANIE GARABOTE, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Docket No. LT-000891-22. Mario Miguel … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3205-22 THE VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC., … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Bergen County, Docket No. C-000020-23. Paul E. … being advised by the parties that the issues in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal is dismissed with …