njcourts.gov
… record. API employed plaintiff from October 1999 until his termination in October 2019. At the time of his termination, plaintiff was the managing director of API's … Because "[t]here[] [was] absolutely no evidence to support plaintiff's contention that Franko[v]it[s] decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… record. API employed plaintiff from October 1999 until his termination in October 2019. At the time of his termination, plaintiff was the managing director of API's … Because "[t]here[] [was] absolutely no evidence to support plaintiff's contention that Franko[v]it[s] decided …
njcourts.gov
… reconsider a March 27, 2018 order that compelled him to pay child support and other child care expenses, and denied his request to require …
-
njcourts.gov
… reconsider a March 27, 2018 order that compelled him to pay child support and other child care expenses, and denied his request to require …
njcourts.gov
… order denying defendant M.J.-B.'s1 motion to vacate a 2018 child support order, he appealed. He argues that relief from the child support award is appropriate under Rule 4:50-1(c) and …
-
njcourts.gov
… order denying defendant M.J.-B.'s1 motion to vacate a 2018 child support order, he appealed. He argues that relief from the child support award is appropriate under Rule 4:50-1(c) and …
njcourts.gov
… establishing that he is the biological father of the child born during his marriage to defendant, Noura El … second test. A few months later, the court entered a child support order for $214 per week and setting arrears at … and all the orders entered based on the paternity determination. A different judge denied plaintiff's third …
-
njcourts.gov
… establishing that he is the biological father of the child born during his marriage to defendant, Noura El … second test. A few months later, the court entered a child support order for $214 per week and setting arrears at … and all the orders entered based on the paternity determination. A different judge denied plaintiff's third …
njcourts.gov
… 1 We use initials to identify the parties and their children because some of the facts discussed are taken from … which required defendant to pay plaintiff pendente lite support of $7000 per month. In June 2013, the court … of the payments. Thus, the record supports the court's determination that defendant failed to submit sufficient, …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 We use initials to identify the parties and their children because some of the facts discussed are taken from … which required defendant to pay plaintiff pendente lite support of $7000 per month. In June 2013, the court … of the payments. Thus, the record supports the court's determination that defendant failed to submit sufficient, …
-
njcourts.gov
… who have been convicted of possessing or distributing child pornography. Defendants both pled guilty to … We conclude that neither defendant created the record to support his arguments. Accordingly, we affirm and issue this … In re C.A., 146 N.J. at 83). Furthermore, the judicial determination regarding the tiering classification and …
njcourts.gov
… 24, 2023, that granted plaintiff an upward modification of child support, and April 28, 2023, that awarded plaintiff … or her discretion"); and Rendine, 141 N.J. at 317 ("fee determinations by trial courts [should] be 10 A-2861-22 …
-
njcourts.gov
… 24, 2023, that granted plaintiff an upward modification of child support, and April 28, 2023, that awarded plaintiff … or her discretion"); and Rendine, 141 N.J. at 317 ("fee determinations by trial courts [should] be 10 A-2861-22 …
njcourts.gov
… which denied his motion for a downward modification of his child support obligation. We affirm. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … were married in 1990, and divorced in 2015. They have two children, one born in 1998, and the other in 2001. At the …
-
njcourts.gov
… which denied his motion for a downward modification of his child support obligation. We affirm. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … were married in 1990, and divorced in 2015. They have two children, one born in 1998, and the other in 2001. At the …
njcourts.gov
… 25, 2021 order denying his motion to modify his alimony and child support obligations.1 We affirm. I. The parties were married … satisfied that the findings were mistaken or that the determination could 11 A-3195-20 not reasonably have been …
-
njcourts.gov
… 25, 2021 order denying his motion to modify his alimony and child support obligations.1 We affirm. I. The parties were married … satisfied that the findings were mistaken or that the determination could 11 A-3195-20 not reasonably have been …
njcourts.gov
… 2 A-2254-19T2 until he paid $1000 of the $57,526 owed in support arrears, which payment was ultimately made to … that follow, we affirm. Parents charged with violating child support orders face arrest and potential incarceration … (App. Div. 2010) ("Mootness is a threshold justiciability determination rooted in the notion that judicial power is to …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2 A-2254-19T2 until he paid $1000 of the $57,526 owed in support arrears, which payment was ultimately made to … that follow, we affirm. Parents charged with violating child support orders face arrest and potential incarceration … (App. Div. 2010) ("Mootness is a threshold justiciability determination rooted in the notion that judicial power is to …
njcourts.gov
… parenting time arrangements and for a stay of his child-support obligation. We affirm. I. The parties were married in 2007. They have two children: a daughter, who was born in 2009, and a son, who …