default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3966-19 DAVID CONNOLLY, Appellant, v. … were of such a nature that any reasonable person would have understood the orders; 3) the orders were loud enough that the entire group could have heard the orders; 4) Connolly had ample time to comply …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3978-19 COURTNEY BUNCH, Appellant, v. … court is '"whether the findings made could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in … requested representation by counsel and waived his right to have his hearing conducted within the fourteen- day …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3638-18T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … from defendant's counsel for his failure to appear. We have considered defendant's written arguments as set forth … vague and his motion to dismiss the indictment should have been granted as a result. We disagree because there was …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2888-18T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … judge's] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … may, without a warrant, temporarily detain a person if they have a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the person …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4275-18T4 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL … that defendants defaulted in July 2012. Defendant may have ceased making monthly payments before that time. The … 439 N.J. Super. 273, 276 (App. Div. 2015). We, however, have held that HAMP does not pre-empt valid state law claims …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0802-18T1 J.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … for [C.D.'s] visitation" by stating "she did not have a vehicle" when defendant "witnessed her drive up in … to speak. They're investigating, doing interviews, and what have you. The judge further noted that if there was …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2682-18T2 LIONELL G. MILLER, Appellant, … in not giving him a polygraph examination, which would have 7 A-2682-18T2 exposed inconsistencies in Saucedo's … 79, 83 (App. Div. 1997) (concluding the appellant did not "have the right to a polygraph test," citing N.J.A.C …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0747-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. He was …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3064-18T3 BOOTH MOVERS LTD, … 561. On appeal, Booth argues that two of the exceptions we have identified militate in favor of imposing corporate … ever receive or retain any monthly rent from Booth. As we have indicated, DFH did not even exist when Booth entered …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4623-19 P.C.R., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 2C:25-17 to -35. We affirm. The parties are divorced and have two minor children. Following a May 29, 2020 incident, … paying her [child support] . . . [and] that [he] was not to have [the] children for nonpayment." He asserted he went to …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1831-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … days in order to allow the State or the defense to have contact with [the victim] to determine whether or not … In considering motions to withdraw a plea, trial judges have broad discretion. Under Slater, judges are encouraged …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5407-18 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … judge's] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the "feel" of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … that the now self-represented plaintiffs appear to have disregarded in their arguments in this appeal. 5 …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1212-20 T.M.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the parties live in separate parts of the county and have no reason or expectation to remain in contact. … that of defendant's—are well supported by the record. As we have already noted, the red marks and swelling on …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2002-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … indictment with second-degree certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7b(1). Defendant moved to … by [an] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the 'feel' of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1759-24 WESTLAKE SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a … of law, we are "left to conjecture as to what the judge may have had in mind" and we cannot address the merits of the … or acceptance; or (B) the amount of proceeds that would have been realized had the noncomplying secured party …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3376-23 FRANCES HICE, … the handicap ramps was required by the ADA standard to "not have elevation differentials more than [one-quarter inch] … summary judgment to the County. To the extent we may not have addressed any remaining arguments raised by plaintiff, …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0146-24 R.M.K., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Ocean County, Docket No. FV-15-2481-24. … of facts concerning defendant's acts of harassment. As we have summarized, those findings are supported by substantial …
njcourts.gov › notices to the bar
… to Directive #14-24 incorporates the following clarifying revisions as directed by Assignment Judge Robert A. Lougy in … that one ( or more) of the sites in the plan does not have the capacity to accommodate all of the development … confirmation that all of the units on which the controls have been extended are code-compliant or have been …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1880-23 COVENTRY PLACE OWNER LLC, … A-1880-23 Although Coventry considered Goodmann's lease to have expired on May 31, 2022, it sent defendant a notice of … disallowed pest and trash fees because Goodmann did not have notice of those fees, and disallowed late fees on the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2058-23 FANG LIU, Plaintiff-Appellant, … prejudice rather than without prejudice, and (4) she should have been permitted to prosecute the complaint on a … courts not to interfere unless an injustice appears to have been done." 6 A-2058-23 Abtrax Pharm. v. Elkins-Sinn, …