Filters
- Order for Registration/Enforcement of Out-of-State Custody/Parenting Time/Visitation Order Form Document Filenjcourts.gov… Applicant’s Phone: Superior Court of New Jersey Chancery Division – Family Part Plaintiff County vs. Docket Number … out-of-state order submitted is a true copy and that there have been no intervening orders, and for good cause being …
- njcourts.gov… --------------- SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO.: AM-000215-23T5 MOTION NO.: M-002203-23 … ORDER - REGULAR MOTION DV FILED, Clerk of the Appellate Division, January 19, 2024, AM-000215-23, M-002203-23 …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0470-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. SVP-528-09. Joseph E. … Attorney General, on the brief). PER CURIAM The parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0470-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. SVP-528-09. Joseph E. … Attorney General, on the brief). PER CURIAM The parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. …
- Notice – Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection – Attorneys Reinstated from the 2023 Ineligible List Notice to the Barnjcourts.govATTORNEYS REINSTATED FROM THE NEW JERSEY LAWYERS' FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION INELIGIBLE LIST The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection declares that the following New Jersey attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of the annual …
- Notice - Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection – Attorneys Reinstated from the 2023 Ineligible List Notice to the Barnjcourts.govNOTICE ATTORNEYS REINSTATED FROM THE NEW JERSEY LAWYERS' FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION INELIGIBLE LIST The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection declares that the following New Jersey attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of the annual …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1239-22 THOMAS MAINO AND PBA LOCAL NO.: … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Ocean County, Docket No. L-0678-22. Sciarra & … that the matter has been amicably resolved, the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of the appeal, and the …
- Pagano vs Ethicon – Order Dismissing Complaint w/Prejudice Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… PAGANO AND STEVE PAGANO, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION - BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. BER-L-14515-14 MCL …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2791-23 GREENE STREET FUNDING TRUST II, … unreasonable. Moreover, the court noted that discovery may have been permitted or address the issue of reasonableness … illness," the governing law expressly provides that courts have no discretion to extend the twenty-day time frame …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2113-23 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … foreclosure action concerning whether Intervenors should have been permitted to intervene and whether Intervenors …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MICHAEL SUAREZ (93-07-0580, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0966-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Ocean County, Indictment No. 93-07-0580. Peter T. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. HAKIM R. NELSON (15-11-1363, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2206-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … raised for the first time in PCR petitions that could have been raised on direct appeal. McQuaid, 147 N.J. at 483; … 126 N.J. 565, 583–84 (1992). Defendant's arguments could have reasonably been raised in a prior proceeding. The …
- K.A.K. VS. J.M. (FV-15-1366-21, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3370-22 K.A.K.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, … the "need [for an FRO and plaintiff's] fear certainly would have abated." He argues "there is no genuine need for the 2 … between the parties today—the court noted the parties have no children in common but that the pending Chancery …
- PATRICK CALABRIA II VS. JASON RITCHWOOD (LT-006962-20, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0819-22 PATRICK CALABRIA II, … detector. Defendant advised court staff that he did not have a phone and could not participate remotely. As a … judgment for damages against defendant. To the extent we have not addressed any of defendant's remaining arguments, …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3596-21 TIANLE LI, Appellant, v. NEW … limited. In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011). As we have long recognized, "[p]risons are dangerous places, and … own judgment for the agency's, even though the court might have reached a different result.'" Stallworth, 208 N.J. at …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2176-22 TOWD POINT MORTGAGE TRUST … judgment or order and which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under … it is no longer equitable that the judgment or order should have prospective application; or (f) any other reason …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CRUZ MARTINEZ (13-08-1528, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2012-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … PCR petition] cannot be processed at this time since you have a case open with the Appellate Division." On June 17, … of your petition, the services of the Appellate Section have come to an end. On January 27, 2021, defendant sent a …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1765-21 SHALIK COLEMAN, Appellant, v. … 5 A-1765-21 Second, he posits a deduction could have been made only if the money was awarded as a result of … has no bearing on whether the deductions were proper. We have considered all other points raised by appellant and …
- ARELIS RODRIGUEZ VS. SHONTA SINGLETON, ET AL. (L-1997-20, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3661-21 ARELIS RODRIGUEZ, … collectively to be a legal holiday and that they "did not have the effect of adding days to any statute of … not be applied in this case. 8 A-3661-21 To the extent we have not addressed plaintiff's remaining arguments, they are …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3398-21 ROSA M. WILLIAMS-HOPKINS, on … party has 'the right to litigate any claim in court or have a jury trial on that claim'"; and (3) "[t]he Agreement … may not decide an arbitrability question that the parties have delegated to an arbitrator," Henry Schein, Inc. v. …