Filters
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0669-16T2 MARTIN MARANO, … the judge explained that "[n]o new facts that could not have been presented at the plenary hearing have been raised [by defendants, and] [n]o legal issues were …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOSEPH MAGGIO (83-03-0450, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3126-15T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … arguments. POINT I DEFENDANT'S PCR PETITION SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PROCEDURALLY BARRED. POINT II THIS MATTER MUST BE … THIS CASE REGARDING AN ALIBI WITNESS AND FOR FAILING TO HAVE THAT WITNESS TESTIFY. We reject these arguments and …
- njcourts.gov… in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) EQR-LPC Urban Renewal North Pier, LLC … Instead, the Court affirms the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the per … agreement. Using the amended rate, plaintiffs did not have excess net profits and thus did not owe any …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4693-15T1 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., … receive a copy of plaintiff's motion and did not therefore have an opportunity to oppose it. In opposing appellant's … institute an additional and unnecessary Sheriff's sale. We have considered this argument and reject it as without …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0060-15T3 ROBERT J. TRIFFIN, … for reconsideration. Because we conclude plaintiff should have been granted summary judgment, we need not address the … assignment from FLFS. Accordingly, summary judgment should have been granted to plaintiff. Reversed and remanded for …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5061-15T1 M.Y.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County, Docket No. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2201-15T3 ELAR REALTY CO., … that specific project for which the damages were alleged to have [o]curred." In another clause, the contract stated that … was a conflict of interest between defendants that should have prevented their attorney from representing them. …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0762-15T3 AMOLA SHAH, … precedent. "Although an unpublished opinion does not have precedential authority, it may nevertheless constitute … 2009 order compelling arbitration. More than fourteen years have passed since the parties signed the PSA agreement, and …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3163-15T2 RICHARD D. ZOCHOWSKI, as 50% … of this family dispute that dates back to 2003 as we have previously provided those details in our three earlier … the plaintiff's distribution of the proceeds would have been proper and consistent with parties' agreement, as …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3204-15T4 GIGI K COLLECTIONS, INC. and … Gigi's complaint was properly dismissed. Although we have some reservations concerning the trial judge's finding … should not be entitled to damages that reasonably could have been avoided. Covino v. Peck, 233 N.J. Super. 612, 617 …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2790-15T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Mayer. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Somerset County, Municipal Appeal No. 26-15-C. … to assert that if the [NJSP] Manual was produced it would have provided [] [d]efendant with a defense." In reviewing …
- M.F. VS. R.W. (FV-11-1425-16, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4943-15T3 M.F., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … brother had been providing care for grandmother, who may have dementia. Grandmother testified she asked Mary to … argument with a home health aide. He testified he did not have physical contact with Mary except he did "grab" her to …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2603-15T2 FIRST AVENUE REALTY, LLC, … due deference is accorded [to] that expertise." Ibid. We have recognized certain exceptions to the exhaustion … exhaustion of the approval process, as that process would have proven "futile." While it may be "uncertain" that …
- CARLOS MOORE VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD(NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4822-15T1 CARLOS MOORE, Appellant, v. … altercation with L.A. As for the condition requiring Moore have no contact with L.A., the record clearly establishes Moore continued to have contact with L.A., as Moore admitted being with her on …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1956-15T2 ROBERT J. TRIFFIN, … and reasonable; that is, the non- resident defendant must have (1) sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state … the Giordanos in Monmouth County, the motion court should have found it had jurisdiction over the Board. This argument …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. PEDRO J. GOMEZ (14-12-0674, SALEM COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3414-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … hearing, Detective Petrutz, who the trial court found to have extensive training and experience in the investigation … by activity that would lead a reasonable police officer to have an articulable suspicion that criminal activity had …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2709-14T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … by [an] opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the "feel" of the case, which a reviewing court cannot … purpose to observe any contraband that may or may not have been inside[,]" and hence the discovery was not …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MICHAEL JONES (98-10-4330, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2576-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment No. 98-10-4330. Joseph E. … that the Legislature is fully cognizant that defendants have been sentenced to CSL when convicted of sexual offenses …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1366-15T2 BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, … the judgment or order and which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under … it is no longer equitable that the judgment or order should have prospective application; or (f) any other reason …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5594-14T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … BARRED BY EITHER RULE 3:22-4 OR RULE 3:22-5. We have considered these arguments in light of the record and … we conclude the current claims raise the same issues, which have been adjudicated, may not again be raised in a petition …