-
njcourts.gov
… cogently expressed by each of the judges in their written decisions. Factual Background and Procedural History We rely …
-
njcourts.gov
… the parties have bargained here in the PSA. "When reviewing decisions granting or denying applications to modify child …
-
njcourts.gov
… for the reasons expressed in the Board's and ALJ's thorough decisions. We also conclude that Beagin's arguments to the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1670-21 BOONTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION and ROBERT DAVIS, Petitioners-Respondents, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWN OF BOONTON, COUNTY OF MORRIS, Respondent-Appellant. __________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3234-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANK P. CRUSEN, Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ Submitted September 13, 2022 – Decided September 30, 2022 …
-
njcourts.gov
… capricious, and unreasonable. Our review of administrative decisions by the NJSPB is limited and "grounded in strong …
-
njcourts.gov
… 552, 562 (App. Div. 2004). Generally, courts afford the decisions of municipal boards substantial deference, only …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3344-16T2 CHEVRA LOMDEI TORAH and ELIYAOU LEVINE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBA ARYEH and MOSHE ARYEH, Defendants-Respondents, and ELIZABETH INDERRIEDEN and YEHOSHUA FRANKEL, Defendants. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1418-18T4 WALTER D. SEVERNS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted March 24, 2020 – …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0755-18T3 WANDA SLATER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. _____________________________ Argued March 10, 2020 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4526-14T3 L.J.L., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L.G., Defendant-Respondent. ________________________________ Submitted February 6, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Currier. On appeal from …
-
njcourts.gov
… comprising part of a process by which [Clifton's] decisions and policies [were] formulated." The judge … report "certainly [was] part of the process by which the decisions and the policies of the City [were] formulated." … deliberations comprising part of a process by which [its] decisions and policies are formulated." In re Liquidation of …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2729-15T2 JOHN GIERCYK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ESTELL MANOR PLANNING/ ZONING BOARD; HENDRICKS HOUSE, INC.; and THE FOUR B'S, Defendants-Respondents. ____________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
… of Fair Lawn Bd. of Adjustment, 152 N.J. 309, 327 (1998). Decisions of zoning boards constitute quasi-judicial actions … overriding principle governing judicial review of variance decisions by boards of adjustment is that, assuming an … no reason to disturb the Board's or the trial court's decisions, which are supported by sufficient, credible …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2018), all parties agree that the court's summary judgment decisions were based on judicial estoppel. On that record, …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2. The parties shall jointly make any and all significant decisions concerning, but not limited to the child's health, … serve[s] as a human ATM to finance [Mother and Daughter's] decisions made without his contribution, involvement, or …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2795-17T2 RIAD KABAKIBI and LAMA KABAKIBI, Husband and Wife, and RIAD KABAKIBI, M.D., P.A., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RAMESH SARVA, C.P.A., RAMESH SARVA, C.P.A., P.C., and MICHAEL W. FRANK, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5654-16T2 HUDSON MANOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF AGING SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent. ________________________ Submitted January 28, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Sumners. …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Miranda hearing is one of the most difficult strategic decisions that trial counsel must confront. See State v. … and intangible factors. [Id. at 320-21.] Our review of such decisions is highly deferential. Id. at 321. In order to …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1670-21 BOONTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION and ROBERT DAVIS, Petitioners-Respondents, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWN OF BOONTON, COUNTY OF MORRIS, Respondent-Appellant. __________________________ …