-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … those measurements and those found by the Tax Court judge have no bearing on our decision. A-0743-16T1 3 N.J.S.A. … Div. 2011), because "judges presiding in the Tax Court have special expertise," Glenpointe Assocs. v. Twp. of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2042-19 EQUITY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, … owned all the stock of L.L.C.P.V.P. Corp. But ownership may have changed between 2007 and entry of the amended leases. 4 … we need not address whether such a finding, if made, would have been entitled to res judicata effect. 6 We are not …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2604-19 HIDDEN OAK WOODS, LLC, … that the continual and long-standing zoning violations have had on the surrounding and neighboring properties, … predecessor . . . . To put it simply, [plaintiff] could not have misrepresented the facts when [defendant] itself relied …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4418-16T1 D.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … FROs. The parties were married in September 2012, and they have two children. Plaintiff was a stay-at-home wife and … available to the [DCPP]. The [DCPP] currently does not have any concerns regarding abuse/neglect in regards to …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3665-14T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … deference to the findings of our trial judges because they have the 'opportunity to hear and see the witnesses and to have the "feel" of the case, which a reviewing court cannot …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1368-16T4 THE ESTATE OF FRANCIS P. … prejudice. We would reach the same result. Although it may have been preferable for the motion judge to exercise her … and on the same day as we issued a stay. We have no way of discerning the hour we signed the stay order …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3826-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … for interference with custody. However, 4 A-3826-14T1 we have applied the statute in other contexts, focusing on the … supra, 315 N.J. Super. at 88. Although our published cases have focused on a triviality analysis under N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… BRUCE J. KAPLAN, J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY CASE NO. 282 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER … 1. DECEASED PLAINTIFFS a. The cases listed in Exhibit A have been identified as including a deceased Plaintiff for … date a case is dismissed without prejudice, Plaintiff will have 60 days to fi le a motion to reinstate their case and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1966-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … (count five), and second-degree certain persons not to have weapons, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(b)(1) (count fourteen), … home. He testified Jones was "polite, cordial," and "didn't have a problem with it." Walker stated he did not threaten …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3709-22 WILLIAM E. TAYLOR, IV, and … that the owner has given consent. Here, plaintiffs did not have the Association's consent to replace the two existing … walkways and install a third walkway. Also, the HPC did not have the authorization to enter a settlement without the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0999-23 A-1002-23 CARMEN LAWRENCE AIELLO … the discovery end date, particularly when he knew or should have known that 11 A-0999-23 the due date to serve the … the complaint on May 6, 2022. Although Stone moved to have the complaint dismissed based on plaintiffs' non- …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3763-21 MICHAEL J. ENOS and CAROL J. … active members through the HOA's dissolution," claim to have purchased the subject property "in the interest of … prescribed use." The judge reasoned that "the pool could have been shut down and filled in, with the [p]roperty to be …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1632-21 IN RE CLINTON TOWNSHIP … submitted by K&S. However, he asserted that K&S did not "have all the pieces of the puzzle" because it focused on … crux of the K&S objection appears to be a claim that there have been substantial changes in the underlying facts …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2076-23 K.J.S.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent/ … in the garbage." Plaintiff told the officer she "[did not] have anything to eat" and "[did not] have any money" and asked the officer to arrest defendant. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0501-24 JON MUSCO, Plaintiff, v. SMGR … Mahir Allan (Brian L. Whiteman, on the brief). Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM 3 A-0501-24 This … the lis pendens. Therefore, Meister was determined to not have any liability because it had no actual notice and was …
njcourts.gov
… In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized.) State v. Tariq S. Gathers (A-80-16) … level of being intrusive to one’s body.” The Appellate Division granted defendant’s motion for leave to appeal and … 2C:39-5(b); and fourth-degree certain persons not to have weapons, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(a). Five …
njcourts.gov
… in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized). State v. William R. Joe (A-62-15) … and sentence on the New York charges. The Appellate Division held that defendant was entitled to jail credit … credits the same day. Observing that New Jersey did not have control over the time defendant spent in New York …
njcourts.gov
… in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) In re Petition for Referendum to … 4:69-6(b)(11), and dismissed the complaint. The Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal in an unpublished opinion. The … invalid. Ultimately, the court concluded that it did not have to reach that issue because plaintiffs’ complaint …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0355-21 A-0357-21 A-0358-21 120 NEWARK … level can understand the general concept that if you have three separate debts, and only one is paid down, the … 127 N.J. Super. at 572-73. The Special Civil Part "does not have jurisdiction to enter a judgment for possession" if the …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2283-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … offenses charged in the complaint-summonses were alleged to have been committed between various dates in 2021 and 2022 … is a violation of his due process rights for the State to have delayed making the revocation motion such that …