
Filters
- BER-L-10468-14 Case vs Ethicon Inc. Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… vs. ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, a Division of Ethicon, Inc. , GYNECARE; JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET ALS . Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION - BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. BER-L-010468-14 MASTER … Order on Covid-19 issues entered on March 27, 2020, "The provisions of Rule l:32-2A(c) and all other Court Rules …
- Notice - Defaults Scheduled for Review by the Disciplinary Review Board on March 20, 2025 Notice to the Barnjcourts.gov… REVIEW BOARD THURSDAY, MARCH 20, 2025 The following matters have been certified to the Disciplinary Review Board as …
- Naylor vs Ethicon – Consent Order of Dismissal w/o Prejudice Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… vs. ETHICON, INC., ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY, a Division of Ethicon, Inc., GYNECARE, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET … '025 ··""'~~r1 ~• SUPERIOR COURT O; ~~~r-8~§:t. LAW DIVISION - BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. BER-L-004943-16 MASTER …
- Case Management Order 5 Orders and Decisionsnjcourts.gov… *ry66ss,.8s,{l IN RE: BENICAR (Olmesartan Medoxomil) LAW DIVISION: ATLANTIC COUNTY CASE NO: 299 CIVIL ACTION CASE …
- ROSALINE BIH BUH VS. GABRIEL BUH KANG (FM-07-1596-21, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0969-23 ROSALINE BIH BUH, … explained that if the home were sold, she and her son would have nowhere to live and no means to find housing. At oral … 464, 471 (App. Div. 2019) (holding the trial court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to consider a motion for …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1977-22 U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL … 214, 222 (App. Div. 2011) (finding "Deutsche Bank did not have standing when it filed the original complaint 9 A-1977-22 because it did not have an assignment nor did it demonstrate that it possessed …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3357-22 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … A-3092-21 (App. Div. Mar. 20, 2023) (slip op. at 1). Judges have continued F.S.'s commitment since that time following … Antisocial Personality Disorder, cause[s] this court to have serious concerns. Additionally, much of [F.S.'s] …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1551-22 DORETTA CERCIELLO, on behalf of … [P]laintiff waived her right to pursue any claims she might have against defendants in a class action. Plaintiff was … upon the waiver in the arbitration clause. To the extent we have not addressed any of plaintiff's remaining arguments, …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2399-21 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF … under N.J.S.A. 2C:58-3, and that Goworek "should not have had his FPIC denied and his existing FPIC revoked based … payment should be refunded because no fee is required to have a Law Division hearing as to the appeal of the denial …
- U.G. VS. T.S. (FV-14-0956-21, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1803-21 U.G., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … error in a single missed charge not deducted. As we have noted, the judge found all paraprofessional fees were … for secretarial work, completed on July 26 for $51, should have been deducted. Defendant's request for a deduction for …
- GREGORY ROYAL VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2680-21 GREGORY ROYAL, Appellant, v. NEW … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … in 1997 and the recent parole revocation hearing should not have taken place; he served his full sentence for the 1997 …
- CARSON PACKER VS. ROSELINE ESTELLE KONE (SC-000282-21, HUDON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3501-21 CARSON PACKER, … security deposit. The court held plaintiff did not have a legal obligation to paint and spackle, and the … deposit. The notion of "reasonable wear and tear" cannot have meaning without reference to the "nature, quality, and …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3946-21 KARINA GARCES and KEVIN ROSALES, … 36, which states, in pertinent part: [T]he tenant shall have the option to purchase the leased premises. a. The … Ins. Co., 62 N.J. 229, 234 (1973). To the extent we have not addressed any of plaintiffs' remaining arguments, …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3727-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … disturb the trial court's findings merely because 'it might have reached a different conclusion were it the trial … resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic that we 10 A-3727-21 have all had to endure." Again, we find this determination …
- D.A.V. VS. M.N. (FV-20-1938-23, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0088-23 D.A.V., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Union County, Docket No. FV-20-1938-23. … or (3) unsupported by affidavit. To the extent we have not specifically addressed defendant's remaining …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4001-21 CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., … Plaintiff also contended defendant had sought improperly to have plaintiff refund "charges when the unsatisfactory … the trial court 's electronic filing system, defendant may have submitted Exhibit B, which appears to be a screenshot …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOSE E. RODRIGUEZ (18-01-0013, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0845-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Indictment No. 18-01-0013. S. … the Miranda warning from [him]," but that defendant would have heard the Miranda warning prior to going into his …
- J.M. VS. K.A.K. (FV-15-0146-24, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0862-23 J.M.,1 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … at that juncture, we are satisfied reasonable minds could have differed regarding the predicate acts after hearing … store. I can't go to the restaurant next to where I live to have lunch. Every time I turn around, I'm being followed, …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2136-17T4 IN THE MATTER OF THE … entities, where a New Jersey motor vehicle dealer did not have a valid license as of March 6, 2006. A Type "C" … "That deference 'stems from the recognition that agencies have the specialized expertise necessary to enact …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5355-16T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … et al., Static-99 Coding Rules Revised- 2003 5 (2003). [We have] explained that actuarial information, including the … emotionally, cognitively and volitionally, causing him to have serious difficulty controlling his sexually violent …