njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5387-14T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland, supra, 466 U.S. at 687, … on a learning disability asserted by defendant, it would have contradicted the proffered self-defense theory. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4291-14T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … on the attempted murder charge. The State filed a motion to have defendant sentenced as a persistent offender pursuant … slip op. at 13. In April 2015, defendant moved to have the extended term sentence imposed on his attempted …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3937-15T2 ALEXANDER SIMON, … Subsequent to the Judgment of Divorce, the parties have engaged in motion practice to resolve disputes relative … noted that many of the issues raised by the parties would have been resolved had plaintiff engaged in "good faith …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4451-15T1 DANIEL CARABALLO, Appellant, … THE FET IMPOSED IS EXCESSIVE AND SHOULD BE REDUCED. We have considered these contentions in light of the record and … determine whether the factual finding could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence in the …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4516-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, … for the girls. Id. at 24. We concluded the judge should have granted the Division's motion for reconsideration based …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4295-14T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … attorney misled him as to his parole eligibility and should have requested a restitution hearing because he has no … restitution and parole ineligibility because defendant will have the right to air similar claims on direct appeal. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0759-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … The argument raised in Point I, that NERA should not have been applied to the three aggravated assault counts, … in the body of his argument defendant argues that he should have been given concurrent rather than consecutive sentences …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3354-15T3 HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER, … Van Eerde's certification, arguing Van Eerde did not have authority to act on behalf of plaintiff. Defendant also … and defendant refused to pay. Defendant's arguments have not persuaded us otherwise, and lack sufficient merit …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3247-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … "highly likely" either 4 A-3247-17T1 the State would not have proffered it at trial or defendant would have used its inconclusiveness to his benefit had it been …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0793-15T1 HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL … are intended third-party beneficiaries of the trust and have standing 4 A-0793-15T1 to enforce its terms. In … is consistent with the decisions of multiple courts that have addressed the issue. See Correia v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4236-14T1 RAFIQ SALEEM, Appellant, v. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … factual findings if they "could 5 A-4236-14T1 reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence in the …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4729-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … does not negate the possibility that counsel might still have pursued – in accordance with the family's desire – a … include a consideration of the evidence the State could have marshaled against defendant. Because of the lack of a …
default
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3058-20 D.W. and J.W., … D.W. and J.W., appellants pro se. Respondents have not filed a brief. PER CURIAM NOT FOR PUBLICATION … the applicant; (4) The effect that such visitation will have on the relationship between the child and the child's …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3986-19T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to State v. Boone, 262 N.J. Super. 220 (Law Div. 1992). We have carefully considered the record in light of the … relief independently under Rule 3:21- 10(b)(2). They do not have to exhaust the remedies available under the Executive …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3009-18T2 CORNELL BROWN, Appellant, v. … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. … an inmate should be released on parole. The Board does not have to consider all these factors, only those that are …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4598-18T1 RANDY JOHNSON, Appellant, v. … or unreasonable" or that it could not "reasonably have been reached on the credible evidence in the record." … which may be submitted by any persons or agencies which have knowledge of the inmate." N.J.A.C. 10A:71- 3.11(a). …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2400-18T1 PETER LAGOMARSINO, … We conclude that none of defendant's proffered arguments have sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written … insisted on a trial instead of settling, believing she may have gotten a better result. That is not a sufficient basis …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3865-19 SAHDIEKHAN JOHNSON, Appellant, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … POINT II 4 A-3865-19 THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED. The scope of our review of a final …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4482-18T2 VICTORIA HOLMES, … and February 2019. Rather, plaintiff alleged TGI did not have standing to file the summary dispossess proceeding. The … she had no cognizable claim against TGI. To the extent we have not addressed plaintiff's other arguments, we conclude …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2299-18T3 FERNANDO ESCOBAR, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Docket No. SC-001607-18. Jure … of double the amount of said moneys." Ibid. However, we have interpreted N.J.S.A. 46:8- 21.1 to allow the landlord …