-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0923-15T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … argues that his motion to dismiss the indictment should have been granted because N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26(b) does not … N.J.S.A. 39:4-50(a). We further note that repeat offenders have no constitutional right to written or oral notice of …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4986-14T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … Currier. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. SVP- 704-14. Joseph E. … Taken together, the court found these conditions make T.R. "have serious difficulty controlling his sexually violent …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3225-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … findings were "so wide of the mark that a mistake must have been made." N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. M.M., … as the moving party bears the burden of proving that events have occurred subsequent to the entry of a judgment to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5317-16T3 JOHN MOORE, ALPHONSO JOHNSON, … for another day. We find no error in that approach. We have before noted that "[w]hen determining whether a class … Atlantic County's remaining arguments, to the extent we have not addressed them, lack sufficient merit to warrant …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5298-14T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … to demonstrate probable cause when the police successfully have performed a controlled drug buy." Ibid. "[T]he test is … informant's claims. The guns and a quantity of drugs may have been moved to a different location. Second, even if …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0545-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Mercer County, Indictment No. 11-07-0721. Joseph E. … A-0545-15T1 defendant: "Do you understand that because you have pled guilty to these charges the court must impose a 5 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4016-15T4 PEG LEG WEBB, LLC, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … approval of petitioner's application. A-4016-15T4 12 We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0196-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Defendant appeals from his sentence, arguing that he should have been sentenced under amendments to N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 … refers to when defendant pled guilty or is convicted. We have already rejected this argument. See Scudieri, 469 N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4659-15T4 JACINTO KOGER-HIGHTOWER, … that you must come to understand why you reacted and behaved in the crime-specific manner that you did. Because of … findings, we do not disturb them if they "could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence in the …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1245-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Indictment No. 17-01-0038. Esther … did not carry a presumption of imprisonment, which would have implicated the consequences of the repeal of N.J.S.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4993-15T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … pending an apparently anticipated appeal, and to have the defendant return for status conferences every sixty … to be brought back to court periodically pending appeal; we have no record that any such proceedings were held. And the …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2252-15T2 V.J., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not rise to the level of harassment because he did not have the purpose to alarm or annoy plaintiff; (3) there was … provocations were relevant and the trial court should have considered those provocations. Our scope of review is …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0857-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Gilson. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment No. 13- 10-2497. Joseph E. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1288-17T3 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF … occasionally babysat Beth, told the caseworker he did not have any 4 A-1288-17T3 concerns about domestic violence in … The Division's report concluded, [t]hough [Beth] did not have any marks or bruises on her, her half-sister [Kim] was …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2136-17T4 IN THE MATTER OF THE … entities, where a New Jersey motor vehicle dealer did not have a valid license as of March 6, 2006. A Type "C" … "That deference 'stems from the recognition that agencies have the specialized expertise necessary to enact …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5355-16T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … et al., Static-99 Coding Rules Revised- 2003 5 (2003). [We have] explained that actuarial information, including the … emotionally, cognitively and volitionally, causing him to have serious difficulty controlling his sexually violent …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0353-17T2 GUILIO MESADIEU, Appellant, v. … the following arguments: POINT [ONE] [] MESADIEU SHOULD HAVE BEEN FOUND NOT GUILTY OF [*.306], [*.260], and [.256] … prohibited acts. "[I]n prison disciplinary matters we have not traditionally required elaborate written …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2532-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … "was extremely un-cooperative verbally" and told him: "you have no right to stop me and I have nothing in the car." At this point, Fox detained both …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5351-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the conclusions of the Law Division judge "could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in … As such, it is only required if "after all other warnings have been provided, a person detained for driving while …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0592-17T1 KEITH HELD, … the home state's law. N.J.S.A. 39:5D- 4(a)(2) and (c). We have held that New York's "driving while ability impaired" … similar to a New Jersey DWI offense. Our decision to have the factual record developed more fully in this …