-
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ESSEX … Decided: April 24, 2019 Bruce Gudin and Charles Issacs, for plaintiff (Ehrlich, Petriello, Gudin & Plaza, attorneys) … alternate outcomes that might have resulted under different facts. The tenants, in this case, are already paying the …
-
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ESSEX … Decided: April 24, 2019 Bruce Gudin and Charles Issacs, for plaintiff (Ehrlich, Petriello, Gudin & Plaza, … alternate outcomes that might have resulted under different facts. The tenants, in this case, are already paying the …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE … of the County Board is affirmed. I. Procedural History and Factual Findings The court makes the following findings of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 13, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Guadagno. On appeal from the New … of Labor and Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Claim Petition No. 2013-1691. Christopher M. … In a workers' compensation case, we must defer to the factual findings and legal conclusions of the judge of …
-
njcourts.gov
… WOMEN'S HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, PA, DR. G'S FRANCHISING COMPANIES, LLC,1 Defendants-Respondents. … Argued December 12, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher, Sumners and Moynihan. On appeal from … the other medications prescribed to Melissa. Yet, these factors go to the strength or believability of his …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 2, 2021 — Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior … a teenage son who lives with plaintiff. Plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce in 2014. On August 21, 2017, one month … and presented a case information statement (CIS) budget totaling "more than both parties earn after taxes." The …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 15, 2021 – Decided April 9, 2021 Before Judges Mayer and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … litigation). We affirm. We provide a brief overview of the facts. This appeal involves three distinct litigations in … was held by a family corporation, to a limited liability company wholly owned by Bharat. The circumstances leading to …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 19, 2020 – Decided August 2, 2021 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … property was to be sold 3 A-0158-19 in "[s]uch a state of facts as an accurate survey and inspection would disclose" … ($290,000) and the sheriff's 1 It claimed these costs were comprised of $38,528.20 in out-of-pocket expenses and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 4, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Gilson. On appeal from Superior … No. A-5762-03 (App. Div. Dec. 17, 2004). Following the completion of his prison sentence, defendant was civilly … found that all of defendant's remaining arguments lacked a factual basis, or were based on unsupported contentions, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 4, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from Superior … of P.M. and A.D.M. A.M. and P.M. alleged that A.D.M. had committed acts of terroristic threats, harassment, and … 'was not premised upon consideration of all relevant factors, was based upon 9 A-2612-17T1 consideration of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 24, 2019 – Decided February 13, 2019 Before Judges Koblitz, Ostrer, and Mayer. On appeal from the … of Labor and Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Claim Petition No. 2014-10452. Kathleen A. … 44 N.J. 589, 599 (1965)). We may not substitute our own fact- findings for those made by the compensation judge. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 18, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti, Rothstadt and Gilson. On appeal from … PER CURIAM On November 13, 2015, plaintiff C.M.C. filed a complaint in the Family Part, Union County, for the adoption … she and R.M.C. had "enjoyed a committed relationship together." After G.M. was born, W.A.D. and R.M.C. became the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 4, 2019 – Decided January 3, 2020 Before Judges Sabatino and Geiger. On appeal from the Superior … agreed to pay plaintiff term alimony of $160 per week commencing one week after the sale of the marital residence … of Am., 65 N.J. 474, 484 (1974)). We will not disturb the factual findings and legal conclusions unless 7 A-3303-17T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 3, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Gilson and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … on a table was introduced into evidence at trial without comment by the prosecution. As part of their investigation, … violated; (2) the finding of aggravating and mitigating factors were not 'based upon competent and credible evidence …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 1, 2018 - Decided Before Judges Gilson and Mayer. On appeal from Superior Court … also appeals from his conviction, arguing the prosecutor's comments during closing argument deprived him of a fair trial. We affirm. The following facts were presented during the evidentiary hearing on …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 9, 2018 – Decided June 28, 2018 Before Judges Koblitz and Suter. On appeal from the Board of … events that he alleged were the cause of his PTSD. In a comprehensive written decision on March 24, 2017, the ALJ … the Patterson test, the court then applies the Richardson factors to the member's application. [Id. at 31-32.] …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 13, 2018 – Decided June Before Judges Fasciale, Sumners and Moynihan. On appeal from … Protection and Permanency's (the Division) guardianship complaint; and that the court failed to set forth factual … misguided, as even he acknowledges that he "was not a target defendant," and the proceeding played no part in Judge …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 12, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner and Hoffman. On appeal from Superior … 463, 479 (2013) (quoting Assembly Health & Human Services Committee, Statement to Assembly Bill No. 50 at 20 (Mar. 4, … Id. at 484. 3 A-3567-15T2 I These are the most pertinent facts. On December 5, 2011, plaintiff went to defendant for …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0202-16T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF B.R., SVP-753-16. … Submitted August 30, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Rothstadt and Vernoia. On appeal from the … She testified that B.R.'s age, fifty-one, is the primary factor mitigating against his reoffending. She concluded, 6 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 11, 2024 – Decided September 23, 2024 Before Judges Mayer and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … of Sara. Plaintiff does not expressly challenge the court's factual and credibility findings. Based on our review of the … trial court's thirty-nine-page statement of reasons that accompanied the September 7, 2022 order. We therefore only …