-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2252-15T2 V.J., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not rise to the level of harassment because he did not have the purpose to alarm or annoy plaintiff; (3) there was … provocations were relevant and the trial court should have considered those provocations. Our scope of review is …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0857-14T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Gilson. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Indictment No. 13- 10-2497. Joseph E. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1288-17T3 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF … occasionally babysat Beth, told the caseworker he did not have any 4 A-1288-17T3 concerns about domestic violence in … The Division's report concluded, [t]hough [Beth] did not have any marks or bruises on her, her half-sister [Kim] was …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2136-17T4 IN THE MATTER OF THE … entities, where a New Jersey motor vehicle dealer did not have a valid license as of March 6, 2006. A Type "C" … "That deference 'stems from the recognition that agencies have the specialized expertise necessary to enact …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5355-16T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL … et al., Static-99 Coding Rules Revised- 2003 5 (2003). [We have] explained that actuarial information, including the … emotionally, cognitively and volitionally, causing him to have serious difficulty controlling his sexually violent …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0353-17T2 GUILIO MESADIEU, Appellant, v. … the following arguments: POINT [ONE] [] MESADIEU SHOULD HAVE BEEN FOUND NOT GUILTY OF [*.306], [*.260], and [.256] … prohibited acts. "[I]n prison disciplinary matters we have not traditionally required elaborate written …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2532-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … "was extremely un-cooperative verbally" and told him: "you have no right to stop me and I have nothing in the car." At this point, Fox detained both …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5351-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … the conclusions of the Law Division judge "could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in … As such, it is only required if "after all other warnings have been provided, a person detained for driving while …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0592-17T1 KEITH HELD, … the home state's law. N.J.S.A. 39:5D- 4(a)(2) and (c). We have held that New York's "driving while ability impaired" … similar to a New Jersey DWI offense. Our decision to have the factual record developed more fully in this …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3736-17T4 JOE RAINER, … and 4:40 to the Special Civil Part). 5 A-3736-17T4 What I have is the testimony of . . . plaintiff who testified that … the expiration of the lease agreement, plaintiff should have required defendant to sign a guaranty agreement. In the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5619-17T3 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., … litigation was taking place," and further found John should have raised the service issue in the applications for an … . . . proceeding against the [debtor] that was or could have been commenced" before the filing of the petition. 11 …
-
njcourts.gov
… in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) State v. Isaac A. Young (A-61-16) … Instead, the Court affirms the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge … a person or entity authorized by N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.10a(b) to have such records, or that defendant encouraged such a …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1207-20 DIANA MEY, Plaintiff, v. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … and therefore the foreign judgment was void and should have been vacated. We vacate and remand for further …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0997-19 JOHN COLLINS and ANIMAL … violations of Collins' rights and the public's rights have been continuing and serious." We disagree. 2 Even if … 30, 2021. We agree with the trial court that plaintiffs have simply not been subject to the sort of continuing …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1314-21 WILLIAM KIANKA, JR., … Rathblott was issued, New Jersey law has evolved, and we have held that a special relationship must be shown to a … identify any facts that defendant knew or reasonably should have known that they were undertaking a duty to protect him …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2969-20 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF … and allowed "[b]oth Albert [Jr.] and Ronald . . . to have their counsel fees paid from the estates for any and … fees. The beneficiaries and other interested parties should have an opportunity to object to any award of fees or the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0220-21 IN THE MATTER OF JUSTIN … Criminal History Check as well as the NCIC III check. You have the right to file an appeal within 30 days of receiving … investigative experience and to any expertise he appears to have developed in administering the statute." Weston, 60 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2177-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … as well as the facts set forth in this Affidavit, I have probable cause to believe and do believe that being … data pertaining to the shooting. To the extent we have not addressed them, any remaining arguments raised by …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2872-20 KENNETH BARR, Appellant, v. NEW … he was not the aggressor, Barr claims the charge should not have been sustained and was not supported by substantial … or unreasonable. Any arguments made by Barr that we have not addressed directly lack sufficient merit to warrant …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1803-21 U.G., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … error in a single missed charge not deducted. As we have noted, the judge found all paraprofessional fees were … for secretarial work, completed on July 26 for $51, should have been deducted. Defendant's request for a deduction for …