Filters
- njcourts.gov… link in the email to join the meeting. (If you do not have a virtual courtroom meeting invitation and the … preview of your camera. If you do not see an image you will have to troubleshoot your equipment. The Moderator will need …
- A-3351-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … who served in "active service in time of war," and who have been declared disabled as a result of their service, … United States Veterans Administration or its successor to have a service-connected disability . . . declared by the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2791-23 GREENE STREET FUNDING TRUST II, … unreasonable. Moreover, the court noted that discovery may have been permitted or address the issue of reasonableness … illness," the governing law expressly provides that courts have no discretion to extend the twenty-day time frame …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2113-23 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … foreclosure action concerning whether Intervenors should have been permitted to intervene and whether Intervenors …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MICHAEL SUAREZ (93-07-0580, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0966-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Ocean County, Indictment No. 93-07-0580. Peter T. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. HAKIM R. NELSON (15-11-1363, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2206-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … raised for the first time in PCR petitions that could have been raised on direct appeal. McQuaid, 147 N.J. at 483; … 126 N.J. 565, 583–84 (1992). Defendant's arguments could have reasonably been raised in a prior proceeding. The …
- K.A.K. VS. J.M. (FV-15-1366-21, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3370-22 K.A.K.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, … the "need [for an FRO and plaintiff's] fear certainly would have abated." He argues "there is no genuine need for the 2 … between the parties today—the court noted the parties have no children in common but that the pending Chancery …
- PATRICK CALABRIA II VS. JASON RITCHWOOD (LT-006962-20, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0819-22 PATRICK CALABRIA II, … detector. Defendant advised court staff that he did not have a phone and could not participate remotely. As a … judgment for damages against defendant. To the extent we have not addressed any of defendant's remaining arguments, …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3596-21 TIANLE LI, Appellant, v. NEW … limited. In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011). As we have long recognized, "[p]risons are dangerous places, and … own judgment for the agency's, even though the court might have reached a different result.'" Stallworth, 208 N.J. at …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2176-22 TOWD POINT MORTGAGE TRUST … judgment or order and which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under … it is no longer equitable that the judgment or order should have prospective application; or (f) any other reason …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CRUZ MARTINEZ (13-08-1528, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2012-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … PCR petition] cannot be processed at this time since you have a case open with the Appellate Division." On June 17, … of your petition, the services of the Appellate Section have come to an end. On January 27, 2021, defendant sent a …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1765-21 SHALIK COLEMAN, Appellant, v. … 5 A-1765-21 Second, he posits a deduction could have been made only if the money was awarded as a result of … has no bearing on whether the deductions were proper. We have considered all other points raised by appellant and …
- ARELIS RODRIGUEZ VS. SHONTA SINGLETON, ET AL. (L-1997-20, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3661-21 ARELIS RODRIGUEZ, … collectively to be a legal holiday and that they "did not have the effect of adding days to any statute of … not be applied in this case. 8 A-3661-21 To the extent we have not addressed plaintiff's remaining arguments, they are …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3398-21 ROSA M. WILLIAMS-HOPKINS, on … party has 'the right to litigate any claim in court or have a jury trial on that claim'"; and (3) "[t]he Agreement … may not decide an arbitrability question that the parties have delegated to an arbitrator," Henry Schein, Inc. v. …
- njcourts.gov… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2407-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Initially, defendant's contention that the judge should not have considered some pre-trial proceedings, particularly as … "it is extremely unlikely that this [c]ourt would have found it applied." We agree. "The failure to raise …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3326-22 JUAN ROJAS, Appellant, v. NEW … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3689-22 JEFFREY S. FELD, ESQ., … 7 A-3689-22 As the trial court found, plaintiff does not have a legally cognizable stake in the City's decision to … repealing that statute. 8 A-3689-22 To the extent we have not expressly addressed any issues raised by plaintiff, …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0150-22 GISELLE AGUILAR, … consumers at this time. . . . 3 A-0150-22 Accordingly we have administratively closed our file. According to R-1(d) … for both parties: AAA or NAF. 7 A-0150-22 Plaintiff could have initially chosen NAF or any other arbitration …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1305-17T4 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … relief must demonstrate 'that the evidence would probably have changed the result, that it was unobtainable by the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2287-23 THE MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE OF … requirements . . . are not optional. Indeed, some courts have chosen to sanction counsel for disobeying [Rule … satisfied that the legal standards for granting the motion have been met"), aff'd, 339 N.J. Super. 462 (App. Div. …