-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 15, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and O'Connor. On appeal from Superior … bought their property in 2004, grass covered the area comprising the easement. In April 2008, defendant hired a … following a bench trial is well-settled. The trial court's factual findings are to be upheld if supported by sufficient …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2217-15T5 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF A.M. SVP-716-15. ___________________________ … Submitted January 11, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Haas, Rothstadt and Gooden Brown. On appeal from … offenses committed as a juvenile to be a strong aggravating factor because when an individual offends as 6 A-2217-15T5 …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … summary judgment order that dismissed their class action complaint and jury demand. The order required mandatory … agreements. Rule 1:7-4(a) requires the court to "find the facts and state its conclusions of law . . . on every motion …
-
njcourts.gov
… INC., Third-Party Defendant, and CITY OF JERSEY CITY, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … (Badr) appeals from orders dismissing its third-party complaint for indemnification and contribution against … interpretation and application of the TCA to undisputed facts is a legal determination that we review de novo. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 19, 2018 - Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Mayer. On appeal from Superior Court … arrest, defendant was not permitted to contact the rental company to clarify the registration information. Barbagli … unwilling to do so, an officer may conduct a brief and targeted search of the area where the registration might …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 29, 2018 – Decided January 11, 2019 Before Judges Messano and Rose. On appeal from Superior Court … Board denied plaintiffs' application. Plaintiffs filed a complaint in lieu of prerogative writs. The Law Division … front of the property contained "a substantial amount of vegetation and a vineyard[,]" and locating the conservatory in …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 28, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes, Accurso and Vernoia. On appeal from … challenging the court's denial of her motion to compel defendant to contribute to a life insurance policy … basis[,]' considered 'irrelevant or inappropriate factors[,]'" ibid. (alterations in original) (quoting Flagg …
-
njcourts.gov
… A-2299-14T1 TANGIBLE SECURED FUNDING, INC., (Substituted for Plaintiff General Electric Credit Corporation), … Secured Funding, Inc.'s (Tangible) pursuit of the satisfaction of a judgment previously entered in its … 1 In order to avoid confusion created by the parties' common surname, we refer to them by their first names. 2 We …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 4, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Vernoia. On appeal from the Board of … final agency decision disqualifying her from unemployment compensation benefits because she voluntarily resigned her … and turnover of staff in her department, and her dissatisfaction with the amount and payment of her wages. Claimant …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 9, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Geiger. On appeal from Superior Court … Defendant appeals his judgment of conviction for state income tax evasion. He presents four points for our … And it was a significant amount due as a result of the fact that I had to do the margin call routine in 2007. Q Mr. …
-
njcourts.gov
… EDWARD MILLER, NJ TRANSIT CORP., JOSEPH VEGA, and AMERICAN COMMERCE INSURANCE CO., Defendants. … ____________________________________________ NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … "is limited to examining the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged on the face of the complaint." Printing …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 3, 2022 – Decided October 18, 2022 Before Judges Currier, Enright and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal … opined "[t]he likelihood of . . . Williams successfully completing a projected term of parole is fair to poor due to … It also is worth noting the Board's assessment was not altogether different from that of the evaluator who conducted a …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … with various goods and services within walking distance of commuter transit. To be appointed as the redeveloper of the … the non-moving party, are sufficient to permit a rational factfinder to resolve the alleged disputed issue in favor of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 16, 2025 – Decided October 17, 2025 Before Judges Gilson, Firko, and Perez Friscia. On appeal from … decision of the Jersey City Planning Board (the Board) to recommend a publicly- funded renovation project overseen by … report sent to the Board on May 10, 2022. The simple fact is that the Rodrigues report was not submitted to the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 6, 2025 – Decided October 21, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino and Bergman. On appeal from the … the parties substantially agree on many of the underlying facts, they disagree on whether plaintiff was eligible to … that the term "service" within the Policy and statute encompasses all years of work he performed for the County. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 7, 2024 – Decided June 7, 2024 Before Judges Rose and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … judge – and its appeal to 3 A-2291-22 this court – with a complete record of the documentary evidence, including the … "the risk created by the 12 A-2291-22 agreement was in fact the cause of [the] defendant's nonappearance and of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 16, 2025 – Decided February 24, 2025 Before Judges Natali and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from the … to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(b). Gloucester sought to build a commercial solar project in Franklin Township's B Business … uses. We reverse and remand. I. The following relevant facts are from the Zoning Board hearing and the prerogative …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 23, 2024 – Decided January 16, 2025 Before Judges Currier, Marczyk, and Paganelli. On appeal from … 3 A-3131-22 developed pulmonary embolus causing additional complications after the surgery. With her complaint, … the expert report, and the [AOM]." Id. at 564-65. The facts presented here do not support deeming the AOM …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued June 5, 2024 – Decided June 24, 2024 Before Judges Firko and Susswein. On appeal from the Division of Workers' Compensation, Department of Labor and Workforce Development, … the judge highlighted that she "cannot overlook the fact that in Dr. Volshteyn's office notes, he refers to …
-
njcourts.gov
… NEW JERSEY PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION, Respondent. _____________________________ Argued June 4, 2024 – Decided July 3, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Puglisi. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … Englewood Bd. of Educ., 64 N.J. at 6-7. However, the mere fact that the subject of negotiations concerns hours, …