-
njcourts.gov
NOTICE ATTORNEYS REINSTATED FROM THE NEW JERSEY LAWYERS' FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION 2024 INELIGIBLE LIST The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection declares that the following New Jersey attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of the …
-
njcourts.gov
… New Jersey/Defendant … Superior Court of New Jersey … Law Division – Criminal Part … State of New Jersey … - Select …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0306-24 MADELAINE WALLACE, … so close to trial undermined best practices and would have required an 4 A-0306-24 additional trial adjournment to … summary judgment. She claims the trial court should have reconsidered its order granting the motions as it was …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0982-24 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … He contends that his comments, while offensive, could have alternative explanations and that the evidence failed … conduct under N.J.S.A. 2C:33-2(a)(1). To the extent we have not addressed any of defendant's remaining arguments, …
njcourts.gov
… fairness dictates that the court allows the taxpayer to have a full exposition of their case. Second, there is the … discovery, ownership status is unclear. This may or may not have bearing on the exemption. See Jutland Construction …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0653-24 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Morris County, Indictment No. 24-07-0743. Gold, … not find mitigating factor nine applied because it did "not have sufficient information" to support a finding as to that …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1236-23 JASPER FRAZIER, Appellant, v. … center/law library to make a phone call but he did not have the proper paperwork to make the call. She reported … erred in reaching a conclusion that could not reasonably have been made on a showing of the relevant factors. [Id. at …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2791-23 GREENE STREET FUNDING TRUST II, … unreasonable. Moreover, the court noted that discovery may have been permitted or address the issue of reasonableness … illness," the governing law expressly provides that courts have no discretion to extend the twenty-day time frame …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2113-23 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be … foreclosure action concerning whether Intervenors should have been permitted to intervene and whether Intervenors …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0966-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Ocean County, Indictment No. 93-07-0580. Peter T. … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2206-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … raised for the first time in PCR petitions that could have been raised on direct appeal. McQuaid, 147 N.J. at 483; … 126 N.J. 565, 583–84 (1992). Defendant's arguments could have reasonably been raised in a prior proceeding. The …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3370-22 K.A.K.,1 Plaintiff-Respondent, … the "need [for an FRO and plaintiff's] fear certainly would have abated." He argues "there is no genuine need for the 2 … between the parties today—the court noted the parties have no children in common but that the pending Chancery …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0819-22 PATRICK CALABRIA II, … detector. Defendant advised court staff that he did not have a phone and could not participate remotely. As a … judgment for damages against defendant. To the extent we have not addressed any of defendant's remaining arguments, …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3596-21 TIANLE LI, Appellant, v. NEW … limited. In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011). As we have long recognized, "[p]risons are dangerous places, and … own judgment for the agency's, even though the court might have reached a different result.'" Stallworth, 208 N.J. at …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2176-22 TOWD POINT MORTGAGE TRUST … judgment or order and which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under … it is no longer equitable that the judgment or order should have prospective application; or (f) any other reason …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2012-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … PCR petition] cannot be processed at this time since you have a case open with the Appellate Division." On June 17, … of your petition, the services of the Appellate Section have come to an end. On January 27, 2021, defendant sent a …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1765-21 SHALIK COLEMAN, Appellant, v. … 5 A-1765-21 Second, he posits a deduction could have been made only if the money was awarded as a result of … has no bearing on whether the deductions were proper. We have considered all other points raised by appellant and …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3661-21 ARELIS RODRIGUEZ, … collectively to be a legal holiday and that they "did not have the effect of adding days to any statute of … not be applied in this case. 8 A-3661-21 To the extent we have not addressed plaintiff's remaining arguments, they are …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3398-21 ROSA M. WILLIAMS-HOPKINS, on … party has 'the right to litigate any claim in court or have a jury trial on that claim'"; and (3) "[t]he Agreement … may not decide an arbitrability question that the parties have delegated to an arbitrator," Henry Schein, Inc. v. …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2407-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Initially, defendant's contention that the judge should not have considered some pre-trial proceedings, particularly as … "it is extremely unlikely that this [c]ourt would have found it applied." We agree. "The failure to raise …